Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
American Mineralogist Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

American Mineralogist; July 2007; v. 92; no. 7; p. 1031-1037; DOI: 10.2138/am.2007.2445
© 2007 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Uchida, H.
Right arrow Articles by Yang, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Investigation of synthetic Mg1.3V1.7O4 spinel with MgO inclusions: Case study of a spinel with an apparently occupied interstitial site

Hinako Uchida1,*, Kevin Righter2, Barbara Lavina3,4, Matthew M. Nowell5, Stuart I. Wright5, Robert T. Downs1 and Hexiong Yang1

1 Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721-0077, U.S.A.
2 Mailcode KT, NASA Johnson Space Center, 2101 NASA Parkway, Houston, Texas 77058, U.S.A.
3 High Pressure Science and Engineering Center, University of Nevada Las Vegas, Las Vegas, Nevada 89154-4002, U.S.A.
4 GSECARS, University of Chicago, 5734 S. Ellis Avenue, Chicago, Illinois 60637, U.S.A.
5 EDAX-TSL, Draper, Utah 84020, U.S.A.

Correspondence: * E-mail: uchidah{at}email.arizona.edu

A magnesium vanadate spinel crystal, ideally MgV2O4, synthesized at 1 bar, 1200 °C and equilibrated under FMQ + 1.3 log fO2 condition, was investigated using single-crystal X-ray diffraction, electron microprobe, and electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD). The initial X-ray structure refinements gave tetrahedral and octahedral site occupancies of T(Mg0.966{square}0.034) and M(V3+0.711V4+0.109Mg0.180), respectively, along with the presence of 0.053 apfu Mg at an interstitial octahedral site (16c). Back-scattered electron (BSE) images and electron microprobe analyses revealed the existence of an Mg-rich phase in the spinel matrix, which was too small (≥ 3 µm) for an accurate chemical determination. The EBSD analysis combined with X-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy (XEDS) suggested that the Mg-rich inclusions are periclase oriented coherently with the spinel matrix. The final structure refinements were optimized by subtracting the X-ray intensity contributions (~9%) of periclase reflections, which eliminated the interstitial Mg, yielding a structural formula for spinel TMgM(V3+1.368V4+0.316Mg0.316)O4. This study provides insight into possible origins of refined interstitial cations reported in the literature for spinel, and points to the difficulty of using only X-ray diffraction data to distinguish a spinel with interstitial cations from one with coherently oriented MgO inclusions.

Key Words: Spinel • crystal chemistry • XRD • inclusion • periclase • electron backscatter diffraction







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Mineralogical Society of America