Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
American Mineralogist Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

American Mineralogist; October; v. 93; no. 10; p. 1670-1677; DOI: 10.2138/am.2008.2924
© 2008 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Saruwatari, K.
Right arrow Articles by Kogure, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Comparison of crystallographic orientations between living (Emiliania huxleyi and Gephyrocapsa oceanica) and fossil (Watznaueria barnesiae) coccoliths using electron microscopes

Kazuko Saruwatari1,*, Noriaki Ozaki2,3, Hiromichi Nagasawa3 and Toshihiro Kogure1

1 Department of Earth and Planetary Science, Graduate School of Science, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan
2 Department of Functional Bioscience, Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8577, Japan
3 Department of Applied Biological Chemistry, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Yayoi 1-1-1, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8657, Japan

Correspondence: * E-mail: kazuko{at}eps.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp

Crystallographic orientations of coccoliths produced by the extant species Emiliania huxleyi and Gephyrocapsa oceanica, and of a fossil cocccolith, Watzunaueria barnesiae, all of which are mainly composed of calcite crystals with horizontally oriented c axes (termed R-units), were investigated using two electron diffraction techniques. According to electron backscattered diffraction (EBSD) analyses, the c-axis inclinations of all R-units were oriented about 10–30° from the sample substrate, which is approximately parallel to the organic base plate of the coccolith. However, the directions are toward the coccolith exterior in living coccoliths but toward the interior in fossil coccoliths. The crystallographic orientations of calcite crystals characterized by sub-vertically oriented c axes (termed V-units) were determined only for W. barnesiae and were similar to those of V-units in another living cococlith, Pleurochrysis carterae. Highly regulated crystallographic orientation and consistent chirality were evidenced for all the coccoliths with only a few degrees of variations by Kikuchi patterns analyses from TEM. To determine the indices of the crystallographic plane and edge direction that constitute distal and proximal shield elements, SEM stereo-photogrammetry in combination with EBSD analyses was applied. In the living coccoliths both shields contain the c-axis and the surface is estimated to be {2Formula Formula0} with [481] the longer peripheral edge. On the other hand, the two shield surfaces of W. barnesiae are evaluated {10Formula4} and the distal shield surface is surrounded by clear [481] edges. This indicates that the crystallography and morphology of R-units were not fixed for the past 230 million years. Based on these results, the calcite nucleation mechanisms are discussed with respect to the atomic arrangements on the organic template through all the coccoliths.

Key Words: Biomineralization • coccolith • EBSD • SEM • stereo-photogrammetry • Kikuchi pattern • TEM • calcite







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Mineralogical Society of America