Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
American Mineralogist Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

American Mineralogist; November-December; v. 93; no. 11-12; p. 1851-1857; DOI: 10.2138/am.2008.2935
© 2008 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nagashima, M.
Right arrow Articles by Akasaka, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Crystal chemistry of macfallite: Relationships to sursassite and pumpellyite

Mariko Nagashima1,2,*, Nouri-Said Rahmoun1, Evgeny V. Alekseev1, Charles A. Geiger1, Thomas Armbruster2 and Masahide Akasaka3

1 Institut für Geowissenschaften, Abteilung Mineralogie, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, D-24098, Kiel, Germany
2 Mineralogical Crystallography, Institute of Geological Sciences, University of Bern, Freiestrasse 3, CH-3012, Bern, Switzerland
3 Department of Geoscience, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Shimane University, Matsue 690-8504, Japan

Correspondence: * E-mail: mariko.nagashima{at}krist.unibe.ch

The crystal chemistry of macfallite from Keweenaw County, Michigan was studied using electron microprobe, thermogravimetry (TG), differential thermal analysis (DTA), powder Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, and single-crystal X-ray diffraction methods. The chemical formula derived from the electron-microprobe measurements is


Formula

An analysis using the intensities of the MnLβ and MnL{alpha} X-ray lines shows that most Mn is trivalent. The weight loss from TG measurement is 7.7 wt% at 1000 °C, most of which is interpreted to be due to the loss of structural OH groups. The crystal structure of macfallite [a = 8.959(3), b = 6.072(2), c = 10.218(4) Å, β = 110.75(3)°, space group P21/m], which is isostructural with sursassite, was refined using 1717 unique reflections to R = 4.1%. The site populations at the three independent octahedral sites, Mn1, Mn2, and Mn3, are Mn0.82Al0.06Mg0.09Cu0.03, Mn0.75Al0.25, and Mn0.95Al0.05, respectively. In agreement with a bond-valence analysis, three crystal-chemically different OH groups are located at the O6, O10, and O11 positions. The site O7 is mostly occupied by oxygen, but minor amounts of hydroxyl may be located there as well. The powder FTIR spectrum in the region of the OH-stretching vibrations is characterized by three strong bands at 3413, 3376, and 3239 cm–1 and an additional broad absorption band around 2900 cm–1. The latter results from a relatively strong hydrogen bond, O6-H···O11, with a length of ~2.63 Å. Although there are three main hydroxyl groups occurring in macfallite, the exact number depends on the concentration of trivalent and divalent cations at the Mn1 site. If divalent cations occur at Mn1, a fourth OH group is necessary to maintain charge balance.

Key Words: Macfallite • pumpellyite • sursassite • Mn silicates • hydrous silicates • FTIR spectroscopy • crystal structure




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
American MineralogistHome page
M. Nagashima, M. Akasaka, T. Minakawa, E. Libowitzky, and T. Armbruster
Sursassite: Hydrogen bonding, cation order, and pumpellyite intergrowth
American Mineralogist, October 1, 2009; 94(10): 1440 - 1449.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Mineralogical Society of America