Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
American Mineralogist Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

American Mineralogist; February-March; v. 93; no. 2-3; p. 360-372; DOI: 10.2138/am.2008.2588
© 2008 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Geiger, C. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Silicate garnet: A micro to macroscopic (re)view

Charles A. Geiger*

Institut für Geowissenschaften, Abteilung Mineralogie, Universität Kiel, Olshausenstr. 40, D-24098 Kiel, Germany

Correspondence: * E-mail: chg{at}min.uni-kiel.de

Silicate garnets, general formula E3G2Si3O12, form an important class of rock-forming minerals and, in nature, most are solid solutions. Their crystal-chemical and solid-solution properties are sometimes interpreted in terms of the widely used Pyralspite-Ugrandite classification scheme, and this can lead to erroneous conclusions. In this study, published data are reviewed and analyzed to achieve a synthesis of relevant experimental and computational results and to construct a working "crystal-chemical model" for describing aluminosilicate garnet, E3Al2Si3O12, over different length scales. The pyrope-grossular (Py-Gr) solid solution is given special attention, because it has received a great deal of study. It also shows interesting crystal-chemical and thermodynamic mixing behavior. Computational and experimental investigations made on Py-Gr garnets indicate that the shorter Ca/Mg-O2 bond lengths appear to remain roughly constant in length across the binary and can be described as showing "Pauling limit-type" behavior. The longer Ca/Mg-O4 bonds behave differently, because they lengthen with increasing Gr component in the solid solution. Bond behavior in almandine-spessartine (Al-Sp) garnets appears to be partly different, because both Fe/Mn-O2 and Fe/Mn-O4 bonds show "Pauling limit-type" behavior. E-O bond-length variations are continuous. The bonding type in all aluminosilicate garnet end-members is similar. An analysis shows that various computational simulations on Py-Gr solid solutions are consistent with each other with respect to E-O bond behavior and also with experimental IR, Raman, NMR spectroscopic, and X-ray diffraction results, but not completely with XAS studies made at the Ca edge. Ca/Mg-O4 bond behavior can be used to explain, partly, the nature of various micro/nanoscopic crystal-chemical and strain properties and macroscopic excess thermodynamic mixing behavior of Py-Gr garnets. Micro/nanostrain for the Py-Gr binary is asymmetric in nature, as are the various thermodynamic mixing functions {Delta}Hex, {Delta}Sex, and {Delta}Vex. The widely cited Pyralspite-Ugrandite classification scheme has limited use in terms of explaining many physical and chemical properties of garnet and it should not be used to predict or describe, for example, solid-solution behavior.

Key Words: Garnet • bonding • crystal chemistry • thermodynamics • spectroscopy • X-ray diffraction • computations • strain and solid solutions







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Mineralogical Society of America