Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
American Mineralogist Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

American Mineralogist; April 2008; v. 93; no. 4; p. 520-527; DOI: 10.2138/am.2008.2662
© 2008 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Livi, K. J.T.
Right arrow Articles by Veblen, D. R.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

White mica domain formation: A model for paragonite, margarite, and muscovite formation during prograde metamorphism

Kenneth J.T. Livi1,*, George E. Christidis2, Péter Árkai3 and David R. Veblen1

1 The Morton K. Blaustein Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, U.S.A.
2 Technical University of Crete, Department of Mineral Resources Engineering, 73100, Chania, Greece
3 Institute for Geochemical Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budaoersi ut 45, 1112 Budapest, Hungary

Correspondence: * E-mail: klivi{at}jhu.edu

Scanning transmission electron microscopy images of the 00l white mica planes in crystals from central Switzerland and Crete, Greece reveal that domains of paragonite, margarite, and muscovite are ordered within the basal plane. Energy dispersive X-ray analyses show that both cations in the interlayer and in the 2:1 layer have ordered on the scale of tens to hundreds of nanometers. Domain boundaries can be both sharp and crystallographically controlled or diffuse and irregular. A model outlining the domain formation process is presented that is consistent with X-ray powder diffraction and transmission electron microscopy data. The domain model incorporates aspects of a mixed-layered and a disordered compositionally intermediate phase models. The main feature of the model is the formation of mica species that segregate within the basal plane and contradict the notion of homogeneous layers within mixed-layer phases. Implications for the formation of all diagenetic and very low-grade metamorphic 2:1 sheet silicates are discussed.

Key Words: Muscovite • paragonite • margarite • TEM • STEM • low-grade metamorphism • white mica formation







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Mineralogical Society of America