Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
American Mineralogist Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

American Mineralogist; July; v. 93; no. 7; p. 1119-1132; DOI: 10.2138/am.2008.2681
© 2008 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Coker, V. S.
Right arrow Articles by Lloyd, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Probing the site occupancies of Co-, Ni-, and Mn-substituted biogenic magnetite using XAS and XMCD

Victoria S. Coker1,*, Carolyn I. Pearce1, Richard A.D. Pattrick1, Gerrit van der Laan1,2,3, Neil D. Telling2, John M. Charnock1, Elke Arenholz4 and Jonathan R. Lloyd1

1 School of Earth, Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences and Williamson Research Centre for Molecular Environmental Science, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, U.K.
2 Magnetic Spectroscopy Group, Daresbury Laboratory, Warrington WA4 4AD, U.K.
3 Diamond Light Source, Chilton, Didcot OX11 0DE, U.K.
4 Advanced Light Source, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, U.S.A.

Correspondence: * E-mail: vicky.coker{at}manchester.ac.uk

Ferrimagnetic nanoparticles have many uses in industry including in magnetic recording media and transformers, however these particles are often expensive to synthesize. In this study, the Fe3+-reducing bacteria Geobacter sulfurreducens and Shewanella oneidensis were used to synthesize spinel ferrite nanoparticles of the general chemical formula MxFe3–xO4, where M is either Co, Ni, Mn, Zn, or a combination of Mn and Zn. This was done at ambient temperatures through the dissimilatory reduction of Fe3+-oxyhydroxides containing the appropriate substitutional cations. A combination of L-edge and K-edge X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) and L-edge X-ray magnetic circular dichroism (XMCD) was used to determine the site occupancies, valence, and local structure of the Fe and substitutional cations within the spinels. The Ni and Co ferrites produced using each bacterium were very similar and therefore this study concludes that, despite the difference in reduction mechanism of the bacteria used, the end-product is remarkably unaltered. Nickel ferrites contained only Ni2+, with at least 80% in Oh coordination. Cobalt ferrites contained only Co2+ but with a significant proportion (up to 45%) in Td coordination, showing a slight preference for Td sites. The Mn-ferrites contained Mn2+ only on the Oh sites but a mixture of Mn2+ and Mn3+ on Td sites when the amount of Mn exceeded 3% (compared to the amount of Fe) or some Zn was also present. This study successfully produced a range of nanoparticulate ferrites that could be produced industrially using relatively environmentally benign methodologies.

Key Words: Magnetite • Fe3+-reducing bacteria • substituted spinels • Geobacter sulfurreducensShewanella oneidensis • nanotechnology




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Can MineralHome page
R. A.D. Pattrick, V. S. Coker, C. I. Pearce, N. D. Telling, and G. van der Laan
THE OXIDATION STATE OF COPPER AND COBALT IN CARROLLITE, CuCo2S4
Can Mineral, October 1, 2008; 46(5): 1317 - 1322.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Mineralogical Society of America