Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
American Mineralogist house ad
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

American Mineralogist; August-September; v. 93; no. 8-9; p. 1326-1337; DOI: 10.2138/am.2008.2761
© 2008 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Davidson, L. E.
Right arrow Articles by Benning, L. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

The kinetics and mechanisms of schwertmannite transformation to goethite and hematite under alkaline conditions

Lois E. Davidson, Samuel Shaw* and Liane G. Benning

School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, U.K.

Correspondence: * E-mail: s.shaw{at}see.leeds.ac.uk

The transformation of schwertmannite to goethite and/or hematite in high pH solutions was studied between 60 and 240 °C using synchrotron-based, in-situ energy-dispersive X-ray diffraction (EDXRD). Powder diffraction and electron microscopy indicate that the crystallization of hematite and goethite occurred via intermediate ferrihydrite. At temperatures ≤80 °C goethite was the only crystallization product, while at temperatures >80 °C goethite and hematite crystallized almost simultaneously. At temperatures ≥150 °C a secondary crystallization stage was observed in which goethite transformed to hematite. The activation energies of nucleation for goethite and hematite are 27 ± 1 and 25 ± 1 kJ/mol, respectively, while the activation energies of crystallization are 33 ± 1 and 28 ± 1 kJ/mol. Most of the sulfate was released from the schwertmannite during the early stages of crystallization with <5% of the sulfate remaining associated with the solid phase after crystallization was complete. Sulfate from the initial schwertmannite retarded the dissolution of ferrihydrite, which inhibited the nucleation and the early stages of goethite formation, but did not significantly affect the later stages of goethite crystallization. At high temperatures the presence of sulfate favored the crystallization of hematite over goethite. The activation energy of crystallization for the secondary transformation of goethite to hematite is 103 ± 3 kJ/mol.

Key Words: Schwertmannite • ferrihydrite • goethite • hematite • sulfate • time-resolved • energy-dispersive X-ray diffraction




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeologyHome page
M. E. Elwood Madden, A. S. Madden, and J. D. Rimstidt
How long was Meridiani Planum wet? Applying a jarosite stopwatch to determine the duration of aqueous diagenesis
Geology, July 1, 2009; 37(7): 635 - 638.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeologyHome page
R. Raiswell, L.G. Benning, L. Davidson, M. Tranter, and S. Tulaczyk
Schwertmannite in wet, acid, and oxic microenvironments beneath polar and polythermal glaciers
Geology, May 1, 2009; 37(5): 431 - 434.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Mineralogical Society of America