Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
American Mineralogist RIMG advertisement
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

American Mineralogist; January; v. 94; no. 1; p. 176-180; DOI: 10.2138/am.2009.2984
© 2009 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Davis, F. A.
Right arrow Articles by Hirschmann, M. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

The composition of KLB-1 peridotite

Fred A. Davis1,*, Jean A. Tangeman2, Travis J. Tenner1 and Marc M. Hirschmann1

1 Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Minnesota, 108 Pillsbury Hall, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455 U.S.A.
2 Corporate Research Materials Laboratory, 3M Company, Building 201-4N-01 St. Paul, Minnesota 55144-1000, U.S.A.

Correspondence: * E-mail: davis957{at}umn.edu

Electron microprobe analyses of major- and minor-element oxide components for two glassed samples of natural KLB-1 peridotite are presented. One glass was made with the aid of a phosphate flux, and the second glass was made by laser melting of aerodynamically levitated spheroids resulting in homogeneous silicate glass beads. For unknown reasons, the silicate-phosphate glass yields compositions that are incompatible with the composition of KLB-1 peridotite. However, analysis of the glass bead formed by laser synthesis is believed to give an accurate representation of the com-position of KLB-1 peridotite, except for minor loss of Na2O owing to volatilization. The new data resolve conflicting FeO, CaO, and TiO2 values from two older measurements present in the literature. Mass-balance calculations using the new composition measurement combined with new analyses of the mineral compositions in KLB-1 result in a lower sum of squares of the residuals than those using the older measurements. There are appreciable differences in calculated modes from partial-melting experiments of KLB-1 when calculated using older KLB-1 analyses or our new analysis.

Key Words: Peridotite • KLB-1 • microprobe • mantle • levitating/laser fusion







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2010 by Mineralogical Society of America