Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Pasteris, J. D. Articles by Ding, D. Y. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Experimental fluoridation of nanocrystalline apatite

Jill Dill Pasteris^* and David Y. Ding

Center for Materials Innovation and Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, Campus Box 1169, St. Louis, Missouri 63130-4899, U.S.A.

Correspondence: ^* E-mail: pasteris{at}levee.wustl.edu

Biological apatite, i.e., the major component of teeth and bones, is a widely available source of nanocrystalline apatite. More information is needed about its chemical reactivity in the environment. In the present study, wafers of cross-sectioned dentin and enamel from a modern horse tooth were soaked in phosphate-buffered solutions with NaF concentrations ranging from 0.01 to 2 molar for periods of up to 14 days at about 19.5 °C. The samples were removed at intervals and analyzed by Raman microprobe spectroscopy. Additional, real-time, in-situ Raman spectroscopic analyses were made on some samples during their fluoridation reaction, using an immersible probe. All spectra were deconvolved and their spectral components analyzed for band position, width, and area. Spectral modeling indicates that fluoridation occurred by a kinetically controlled dissolution-reprecipitation process—bioapatite grains partially dissolved and released Ca and P to the F-bearing solution, which caused essentially end-member fluorapatite to nucleate and precipitate, gradually replacing some of the original bioapatite. The replacement process, i.e., fluoridation of the sample, progresses due to the difference in solubility between bioapatite and (highly insoluble) fluorapatite. The bioapatite in (more soluble) dentin reacted much faster and to a much greater extent than that in (less soluble) enamel. These results have implications for paleoenvironmental reconstruction based on the geochemistry of fossil teeth, heavy-metal remediation in soils and water through addition of phosphate phases, and the recommended methods for dental fluoridation in humans.

Key Words: Fluoridation • medical mineralogy • Raman spectroscopy • apatite • fossilization

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Putnis Mineral Replacement Reactions Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, January 1, 2009; 70(1): 87 - 124. [Full Text] [PDF]