Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
American Mineralogist house ad
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

American Mineralogist; February-March; v. 94; no. 2-3; p. 372-379; DOI: 10.2138/am.2009.3018
© 2009 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Groos, A.F. K.
Right arrow Articles by Guggenheim, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

The stability of methane hydrate intercalates of montmorillonite and nontronite: Implications for carbon storage in ocean-floor environments

A.F. Koster van Groos* and Stephen Guggenheim

Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, 845 West Taylor Street, Chicago, Illinois 60607, U.S.A.

Correspondence: * E-mail: kvg{at}uic.edu

Sodium-rich montmorillonite, Na-exchanged montmorillonite, and Na-exchanged nontronite form intercalate complexes with methane hydrate, identified by a characteristic d(001) value of ~2.2 nm. The upper stability of both Na-rich montmorillonite–methane-hydrate complexes is nearly identical to that of methane hydrate, whereas that of Na-exchanged nontronite–methane-hydrate complex is ~1 °C lower. The low-temperature stability of these complexes is controlled by dehydration reactions of the montmorillonite and nontronite. At temperatures of 2 °C, the d(001) value of the montmorillonite complex decreases step-wise with decreasing temperature from ~2.2 nm at 2 °C to 1.6 nm at ≤ – 5 °C, indicating that H2O is progressively expelled from the interlayer. All methane is probably expelled at ~0 °C. The d(001) value of the nontronite complex did not show a similar step-wise reduction and, consequently, the lower stability of this complex is not well established. We conclude that under conditions of reduced salinity, smectite may sufficiently swell and intercalate with methane hydrate in an intermediate to deep-ocean floor environment. Consequently, these smectite–methane-hydrate complexes in the sub-ocean-floor surface may store substantial quantities of carbon.

Key Words: Methane hydrate • smectite • carbon cycle • carbon storage







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2010 by Mineralogical Society of America