Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
American Mineralogist Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

American Mineralogist; April; v. 94; no. 4; p. 517-534; DOI: 10.2138/am.2009.2906
© 2009 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data Info
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ciobanu, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by Melnikov, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Chemical-structural modularity in the tetradymite group: A HRTEM study

Cristiana Liana Ciobanu1,2,*, Allan Pring1,2, Nigel John Cook3, Peter Self4, David Jefferson5, Gabriel Ionel Dima6 and Volodymir Melnikov7

1 South Australian Museum, North Terrace, Adelaide, S.A. 5000, Australia
2 Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Adelaide, S.A. 5005, Australia
3 Natural History Museum, University of Oslo, Boks 1172 Blindern, N-0318 Oslo, Norway
4 Adelaide Microscopy, University of Adelaide, Frome Road, Adelaide, S.A. 5005, Australia
5 Department of Chemistry, Cambridge University, Lensfield Road, Cambridge, CB2 1EW, U.K.
6 Robinson College, Cambridge University, Grange Road, Cambridge, CB3 9AN, U.K.
7 Institute of Geochemistry, Mineralogy and Ore Formation, NAS of Ukraine, Ky’iv, Ukraine

Correspondence: * E-mail: Cristiana.Ciobanu{at}adelaide.edu.au

Mixed-layer compounds from the tetradymite group, in the range Bi2Te3-Bi8Te3, were studied by HRTEM. The formula S'(Bi2kX3)·L'[Bi2(k+1)X3] (X = chalcogen; S', L' = number of short and long modules, respectively) was introduced as a working model. Diffraction patterns show that all phases are N-fold (N = layers in the stacking sequence) superstructures of a rhombohedral subcell with c/3 = d1 ~ 0.2 nm. The patterns, with two brightest reflections about the middle of d1*, are described by monotonic decrease of two modulations with increase in Bi: (1) q = {gamma}csub* (q ~ homoatomic interval; {gamma} = 1.8–1.64 for analytical range; csub ~ 3d1), based on displacive modulation between chalcogen and Bi atoms; and (2) qF = {gamma}Fcsub*; qF = (i/N)d1* = idN*, i = S' + L', relating changes in module size and number to displacements in a basic substructure.

The qF model, besides underpinning the stacking sequences, was adapted to incorporate the homology for S', L' modules related by k. The displacements are quantifiable by fractional shifts between reflections in the derived and basic structures. The condition for "the brightest two reflections about the middle of d1* to be separated by idN*" is fulfilled only if the shift at this position is minimal (equal to 1/Nb; Nb = layers in the basic structure). This model and accompanying program compiled to find suitable Nb and simulate intensity pattern(s) can be used to (1) constrain stacking sequences estimated from observation; (2) predict polysomes as larger building blocks; and (3) discriminate single-phases from random polysomes.

The formula nBi2·mBi2X3 describing the configuration for Bi2kX3 modules by n/m = k – 1 is proven by lattice fringes, but is not underpinned by qF and does not constrain assumed homology.

Key Words: HRTEM • tetradymite group • chemical-structural modularity • minimal shift condition • polysomatism







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Mineralogical Society of America