Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
American Mineralogist house ad
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

American Mineralogist; May-June; v. 94; no. 5-6; p. 761-770; DOI: 10.2138/am.2009.3022
© 2009 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data Info
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Hinsberg, V. J.
Right arrow Articles by Schumacher, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

The geothermobarometric potential of tourmaline, based on experimental and natural data

Vincent J. van Hinsberg* and John C. Schumacher

CETSEI, Department of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Wills Memorial Building, Queen’s Road, Bristol BS8 1RJ, U.K.

The geothermobarometric potential of tourmaline has been assessed by investigating element exchange among tourmaline and coexisting minerals in metamorphosed pelites and graywackes, and in experimental exchange between tourmaline and biotite. In the natural samples, a temperature dependence of tourmaline Mg-Fe exchange with biotite, staurolite, garnet, chlorite, and muscovite, and Ca-Na exchange with plagioclase is observed. Equilibrium calculations for the complete mineral assemblage show that tourmaline is in compositional equilibrium with all coexisting phases, which would allow for an internally consistent set of thermometers among all these phases to be defined. However, a prohibitively large spread is present in the KD vs. T relations. This is not caused by analytical effects, compositional zoning, or disequilibrium among the minerals. The experimental results show that it is the result of inter-site partitioning of elements over the Y and Z octahedral sites of tourmaline. Variations in the element distribution over these sites, their relative participation in the exchange and differences in the temperature dependence of exchange with each site, strongly affects the KD vs. T relation observed, with the slope actually changing sign depending on the elements residing at each site. Non-ideal interactions among the elements at each site will also affect this, and furthermore link every exchange to the bulk tourmaline composition, and hence the element mobility in the rock. The promising potential of tourmaline geothermobarometry can therefore not be fulfilled until effects of inter-site partitioning and non-ideal interactions are known.

Key Words: Tourmaline • mineral exchange • experiments • geothermobarometry • inter-site element distribution







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Mineralogical Society of America