Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
American Mineralogist Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

American Mineralogist; May-June; v. 94; no. 5-6; p. 801-815; DOI: 10.2138/am.2009.2981
© 2009 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Krenn, E.
Right arrow Articles by Konecny, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Two types of metamorphic monazite with contrasting La/Nd, Th, and Y signatures in an ultrahigh-pressure metapelite from the Pohorje Mountains, Slovenia: Indications for pressure-dependent REE exchange between apatite and monazite?

Erwin Krenn1,*, Marian Janák2, Fritz Finger1, Igor Broska2 and Patrik Konecny3

1 Department of Materials Engineering and Physics, University of Salzburg, Hellbrunnerstrasse 34, 5020 Salzburg, Austria
2 Geological Institute, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, 840 05 Bratislava, Slovak Republic
3 Dionyz Stúr Institute of Geology, Mlynská dolina 1, 817 04 Bratislava, Slovak Republic

Correspondence: * E-mail: erwin.krenn{at}sbg.ac.at

Two monazite generations (M1; M2) were distinguished in a kyanite-garnet gneiss from the UHP terrain of the Pohorje Mountains, Slovenia. P-T estimates reveal a peak event at 760 °C/2.6 GPa and isothermal decompression down to 700 °C/0.6 GPa.

M1 type provides a Th-U-Pb mean date of 100 ± 6 Ma, ThO2 contents between 3–7 wt%, Y2O3 values <0.3 wt%, and La/Nd ratios (1.2–1.4) that are clearly higher than for the whole-rock La/Nd (1.1). The absence of Y zoning in M1 and the lack of monazite inclusions in garnet indicate that M1 formed after the main stage of garnet growth (>1.2 MPa), probably close to the P-T peak.

M2 type is slightly younger than M1 (74 ± 16 Ma), and has a lower La/Nd (0.3–0.9), lower ThO2 (0.1–5 wt%), and higher Y2O3 (up to 3.2 wt%). Most M2 monazites occur as tiny needles within apatite (subtype M2-a) or along apatite margins (M2-b). Parasitic growth of M2-a and -b from apatite is supported by its low ThO2 (<1 wt%) and La/Nd (<0.5). Isolated matrix grains (M2-c) and overgrowths around M1 (M2-d) have slightly higher La/Nd (0.5–0.9) and higher ThO2 (5 wt%) and were supplied from an apatite and M1 source. Elevated yttrium suggests that M2 formed during decompression, when garnet was consumed and Y was released.

These observations imply that at UHP conditions MREE-rich apatite coexisted with low-MREE M1 monazite and reacted during decompression to Ca-F-apatite plus MREE-rich M2 monazite. This provides strong arguments that REE-partitioning between apatite and monazite is pressure-dependent.

Key Words: Monazite • apatite • REE distribution • ultra-high pressure • Pohorje Mountains







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Mineralogical Society of America