Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
American Mineralogist house ad
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

American Mineralogist; July; v. 94; no. 7; p. 899-904; DOI: 10.2138/am.2009.3122
© 2009 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data Info
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ye, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Smyth, J. R.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Effects of hydration on thermal expansion of forsterite, wadsleyite, and ringwoodite at ambient pressure

Yu Ye*, Richard A. Schwering and Joseph R. Smyth

Department of Geological Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309, U.S.A.

Correspondence: * E-mail: yey{at}colorado.edu

Single-crystal X-ray diffraction has been used to measure the thermal expansion coefficients of forsterite, wadsleyite, ringwoodite, and their hydrous forms at ambient pressure, from temperatures as low as 133 K to as high as 919 K. Second-order polynomial fitting to ln(V/V0) vs. T was applied to derive the expansion coefficients in the form of {alpha} = a1 x T + a0. The single crystal of anhydrous wadsleyite persisted up to 859 K. Hydrous forsterite was observed to dehydrate at 919 K, whereas hydrous wadsleyite started to dehydrate at 655 K. The crystal of ringwoodite with 0.20 wt% broke down at 911 K, and the two ringwoodite samples with 0.74 and 2.4 wt% H2O, were observed to break down with an irreversible unit-cell expansion at 808 and 606 K, respectively. From room temperature to high temperatures in this study, the mean thermal volume expansion coefficients are 36.4(5) and 38.1(9) x 10–6 K–1, respectively, for anhydrous and hydrous forsterite; 28.5(5) and 35.8(8) x 10–6 K–1, respectively, for the anhydrous and hydrous wadsleyite; 30.6(9), 35.2(15), and 34.9(7) x 10–6 K–1 for the samples of ringwoodite with 0.2, 0.74, and 2.4 wt% H2O, respectively. Thus, forsterite, wadsleyite, and ringwoodite all have larger thermal expansion coefficients in their hydrous forms than in their anhydrous forms.

Key Words: Thermal expansion • forsterite • wadsleyite • ringwoodite • single crystal







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Mineralogical Society of America