Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
American Mineralogist house ad
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

American Mineralogist; August-September; v. 94; no. 8-9; p. 1175-1186; DOI: 10.2138/am.2009.3158
© 2009 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data Info
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Xiong, X.
Right arrow Articles by Yuan, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Experimental constraints on rutile saturation during partial melting of metabasalt at the amphibolite to eclogite transition, with applications to TTG genesis

Xiaolin Xiong1,2,*, Hans Keppler2, Andreas Audétat2, Gudmundur Gudfinnsson2, Weidong Sun1, Maoshuang Song1, Wansheng Xiao1 and Li Yuan1,2

1 Laboratory of Metallogenic Dynamics, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, CAS, 510640, Guangzhou, China
2 Bayerisches Geoinstitut, Universität Bayreuth, D-95440 Bayreuth, Germany

Correspondence: * E-mail: xiongxl{at}gig.ac.cn

TiO2 solubility in rutile-saturated felsic melts and coexisting minerals was determined at 1.5–3.5 GPa, 750–1250 °C, and 5–30 wt% H2O. TiO2 solubility in the melt primarily increases with temperature and melt basicity; it increases slightly with water content in the melt, and it decreases with pressure. A general TiO2 solubility model was obtained and is expressed as: ln(TiO2)melt = ln(TiO2)rutile + 1.701 – (9041/T) – 0.173P + 0.348FM + 0.016H2O, where TiO2 and H2O are in wt%, T is in Kelvin, P in GPa, and FM is the melt composition parameter given by FM = (1/Si)·[Na + K + 2(Ca + Fe + Mn + Mg)]/Al, in which the chemical symbols represent cation fractions. TiO2 solubility in amphibole, garnet, and clinopyroxene also increases with temperature and empirical equations describing this temperature dependence were derived. These data were used to assess the protolith TiO2 content required for rutile saturation during partial melting of hydrous metabasalt at the amphibolite to eclogite transition. The results show that only 0.8–1.0 wt% TiO2 is required for rutile saturation during low-degree (<20%) melting. Rutile is stable up to ~1150 °C with 1.6 wt% TiO2 in the protolith and 30–40% melting for dehydration melting and up to ~1050 °C and 50–60% melting for fluid-present melting. The data also show that 0.7–0.8 wt% TiO2 in the protolith is needed for rutile saturation during subsolidus dehydration. Therefore, nearly all basaltic protoliths in deep-crustal settings and subduction zones will be saturated with rutile during subsolidus dehydration and low-degree melting at hydrous conditions.

Archean tonalites-trondhjemites-granites (TTG) are widely accepted to be the products of low-degree melting of metabasalts at the amphibolite to eclogite transition, with rutile being present in the residue. Comparison of natural TTG compositions with our experimental rutile solubility data indicates that the dominant TTG magmas were produced at temperatures of 750–950 °C, which requires that the partial melting occurred at hydrous conditions. Models involving melting at the base of oceanic plateaus are inadequate to explain TTG genesis because the plateau root zones are likely dominated by anhydrous cumulates. A slab-melting model satisfies the requirement of a hydrous metabasalt, which during subduction would melt to produce voluminous TTG melts under high Archean geothermal gradients. The geothermal gradients responsible are estimated to be between 10 and 19 °C/km based on a pressure range of 1.5–2.5 GPa for the amphibolite to eclogite transition.

Key Words: Rutile • amphibolite to eclogite transition • partial melting • TTG • Archean subduction







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2010 by Mineralogical Society of America