Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
American Mineralogist Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

American Mineralogist; November 2006; v. 91; no. 11-12; p. 1937-1940; DOI: 10.2138/am.2006.2391
© 2006 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Abstract
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow An erratum has been published
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Saruwatari, K.
Right arrow Articles by Kogure, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Crystallographic alignments in a coccolith (Pleurochrysis carterae) revealed by electron back-scattered diffraction (EBSD)

Kazuko Saruwatari1,*, Noriaki Ozaki1, Hiromichi Nagasawa2 and Toshihiro Kogure1

1 Department of Earth and Planetary Science, Graduate School of Science, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan
2 Department of Applied Biological Chemistry, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, the University of Tokyo, Yayoi 1-1-1, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8657, Japan


Figure 1
View larger version (102K):

[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. SEM images of coccoliths viewed from (a) the distal and (b) the proximal sides with inclination of 70° from the horizontal. Insets in the top-right of both figures are schematic cross sections adapted from Marsh (1999). The elements colored with light blue and light pink indicate single V- and R-units, respectively. The distal shields (d), outer tube elements (o), organic base plate (b), proximal shields (p), and inner tube elements (i) are indicated in the figures. The arrow in a indicates the point from which the EBSD pattern in Figure 2Go was acquired.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (87K):

[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. (a) EBSD pattern acquired from the arrowed point in Figure 1aGo. (b) Calculated Kikuchi pattern corresponding to the EBSD pattern in a. (c) Stereographic projections of [100], [Formula0], and [001] directions, showing the crystal orientation determined by EBSD analysis. The origin in the stereo net corresponds to the normal of the substrate. (d) Top view of the coccolith in Figure 1aGo. The arrows are projections of [100] (orange) and [001] (red) directions superimposed on the analyzed V-units. The numbers are angles inclined upward from the horizontal surface.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (75K):

[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. SEM images of coccoliths observed perpendicularly from the (a) distal and (b) proximal side. The arrows are the same ones in Figure 2dGo, showing the projections of [100] and [001] directions determined by the EBSD analyses.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (7K):

[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. Atomic arrangements of Ca (filled circles) and C (smaller open circles) on the calcite {0Formula4} and {2Formula0} planes that are close to the bottom planes of the V- and R-units, respectively, and so are possibly in contact with the organic base plate. The {2Formula0} plane is viewed along the [100] direction. The directions of the coccolith rim are also shown as broken lines.

 





JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Mineralogical Society of America