Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
American Mineralogist Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

American Mineralogist; April 2008; v. 93; no. 4; p. 573-583; DOI: 10.2138/am.2008.2594
© 2008 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Abstract
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data Info
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dörsam, G.
Right arrow Articles by Franz, G.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Crystal structures of synthetic melanotekite (Pb2Fe2Si2O9), kentrolite (Pb2Mn2Si2O9), and the aluminum analogue (Pb2Al2Si2O9)

G. Dörsam1,*, A. Liebscher1, B. Wunder2 and G. Franz1

1 Fachgebiet Mineralogie und Petrologie, Technischen Universität Berlin Ackerstr. 76, D-13355 Berlin, Germany
2 GeoForschungsZentrum Potsdam, Department 4, Telegrafenberg, D-14473 Potsdam, Germany


Figure 1
View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 1. Crystal structure of Pb2Al2Si2O9 in space group Pbcn, (a) projection from a on the b–c plane, and (b) from c on the a–b plane.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (64K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 2. BSE-image shows euhedral kentrolite crystals with small braunite inclusions in a matrix with Pb2SiO4 composition.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 3. Fourier-mappings (Fobs) of the Pb sites in kentrolite-(Al), melanotekite, and kentrolite illustrating differences in electron density (16 contour levels with 20 e/Å3).

 

Figure 4
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 4. Changes in lattice parameters as a function of ionic radii (Shannon 1976) of trivalent cations (Fe, Mn in high spin) on the M-positions in sixfold coordination in kentrolite isotypes. Open squares represent data for melanotekite and kentrolite (this study); filled squares represent the kentrolite isotypes of Al, In, and Ga (Al = this study; In = Werner and Müller-Buschbaum 1997; Ga = Gabelica-Robert and Tarte 1979) open triangles represent Cr and Sc-isotypes (Gabelica-Robert and Tarte 1979).

 

Figure 5
View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 5. Fourier maps (Fobs) with projection from c on the a–b plane, Pb-positions are shown for kentrolite-(Al) in Pbcn (a), melanotekite in Pbcn (b) and kentrolite in P21221 (c).

 

Figure 6
View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 6. Crystal structure of (a) kentrolite-(Al), (b) melanotekite, and (c) kentrolite, projected from c on the a–b plane. Lead positions with high site occupation factor (SOF) are shown as black and gray filled circles. Split lead positions with low SOF are shown as small white or gray filled circles.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 7. Differences in octahedral chain in (a) kentrolite-(Al) compared to (b) kentrolite-(In). Octahedra chain in kentrolite-(Al) is stretched. Black dots represent Al1 and Al2 atoms in kentrolite-(Al), respectively, In1 and In2 atoms in Kentrolite-(In). Differences in M-octahedra of (c) melanotekite and (d) kentrolite is shown with bond-length. The shortest bonds of each octahedon are in gray.

 

Figure 8
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 8. Comparison of mean M-O distances of M3+ (M = Al, Ga, In, Tl) octahedra in Pb2M2Si2O9 and M2O3 as a function of ionic radii (Shannon 1976).

 

Figure 9
View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 9. Projection of the melanotekite structure from a on the b–c plane. (PbFe)O-cluster with O5 as central atom builds a 3D-network. The Si2O7-group is placed in cavities of the cluster-network. Additional Fe-O and Pb-O bonds are shown as solid black and white lines, respectively.

 

Figure 10
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 10. [PbFeO]-cluster displacement by split Pb site.

 





JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Mineralogical Society of America