Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
American Mineralogist RIMG advertisement
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

American Mineralogist; May-June; v. 94; no. 5-6; p. 837-840; DOI: 10.2138/am.2009.3224
© 2009 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Abstract
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Open Access & other Information
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gunter, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Sanchez, M. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Amphibole forensics: Using the composition of amphiboles to determine their source, the Libby, Montana, example{dagger}

Mickey E. Gunter1,* and Matthew S. Sanchez1,2

1 Geological Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho 83844, U.S.A.
2 RJ Lee Group Inc., 350 Hochberg Road, Monroeville, Pennsylvania 15146, U.S.A.


Figure 1
View larger version (106K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 1. A section of a 7.5 min topographic map of Libby, Montana. The blue lines are the approximate boundary of glacial Lake Kootenai. The numbers are sample collection locations keyed to Figures 2Go–5GoGoGo.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 2. Three sets of SEM images and associated EDS spectra obtained on polished samples of amphiboles from the former vermiculate mine near Libby, Montana: (a) Butte 2, (b) float, and (c) Harvard 1. (Names correspond to those used in Sanchez et al. 2008.) For each, the left image is at lower magnification and contains a box that represents the higher magnification image to the right. The small box on the right image coincides to the locations of the SEM beam, and in turn, the area analyzed in the EDS spectra immediately below the images. Note how the Na and K contents increase from a to b to c.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 3. Two sets of SEM images and associated EDS spectra obtained on amphibole particles collected in road cuts of lake sediments located at 3a and 3b on the map in Figure 1Go. Note the upper EDS spectra is Na and K free, while the lower one contains Na and K, and resembles the EDS spectra shown in Figure 2Go.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 4. Two sets of SEM images and associated EDS spectra obtained on amphibole particles occurring at 4a and 4b on the map in Figure 1Go. These samples have similar EDS spectra to those shown in Figure 3Go, but the particles are wider. The upper EDS spectra is Na and K free, while the lower one contains Na and K and resembles the EDS spectra shown in Figure 2Go.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 5. Two sets of SEM images and associated EDS spectra obtained on amphibole particles collected at location 5a and 5b on the map in Figure 1Go. The upper amphibole is not associated with the vermiculite deposit, while the bottom one is, based on the Na and K contents.

 





JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Mineralogical Society of America