Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
American Mineralogist Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

American Mineralogist; February 2008; v. 93; no. 2-3; p. 270-282; DOI: 10.2138/am.2008.2592
© 2008 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Abstract
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by West, D. P.
Right arrow Articles by Barnard, N. Q.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Metamorphosed Ordovician Fe- and Mn-rich rocks in south-central Maine: From peri-Gondwanan deposition through Acadian metamorphism

David P. West, Jr.1,*, Martin G. Yates2, Christopher Gerbi2 and Nellie Q. Barnard1

1 Department of Geology, Middlebury College, Middlebury, Vermont 05753, U.S.A.
2 Department of Earth Sciences, University of Maine, Orono, Maine 04469, U.S.A.

Correspondence: * E-mail: dwest{at}middlebury.edu


    ABSTRACT
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Geologic setting
 Field relationships and...
 Analytical methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgments
 References cited
 
The Wilson Cove Member of the Cushing Formation is a thin (up to 120 m thick) metamorphosed Fe- and Mn-rich unit exposed discontinuously over a distance of >75 km in southern Maine. Cathodoluminescence imaging of zircon grains from the unit reveal texturally isolated detrital cores surrounded by distinct metamorphic overgrowths. U-Pb SHRIMP core ages range from 463 to 2058 Ma with a strong peak in the Neoproterozoic-Early Cambrian. This distribution of ages is consistent with a peri-Gondwanan source region and a Middle to Late Ordovician depositional age. Zircon rims have an age of 373 ± 4 Ma, consistent with growth during late Acadian metamorphism. Whole-rock geochemistry reveals considerable major- and trace-element variability with generally elevated abundances of Fe2O3(t) (15–43 wt%), MnO (0.1–12.1 wt%), Ba (4–2503 ppm), and As (7–1161 ppm). Geochemical discrimination diagrams suggest the protoliths were mixtures of hydrothermal exhalatives and terrigenous clastic sediment, with these materials most likely having been deposited in a marine back-arc basin proximal to a peri-Gondwanan continental source region. Late Devonian low-pressure, amphibolite-facies metamorphism of these bulk compositions produced assemblages dominated by grunerite + garnet + biotite + quartz. These and other mineral assemblages found in the Wilson Cove unit in south-central Maine are consistent with peak metamorphic conditions of 550 to 600 °C and 3–4 kbar previously determined from nearby metapelites. Mineral assemblages, mineral modes, and mineral compositions in these Fe- and Mn-rich rocks are strongly influenced by whole-rock bulk compositional variability. In particular, the compositions of co-existing garnet and grunerite vary systematically as a function of whole-rock MnO concentration.

Key Words: Metamorphic petrology • analysis • chemical (rock) • analysis • chemical (mineral) • geochronology • ironstone • Maine


    INTRODUCTION
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Geologic setting
 Field relationships and...
 Analytical methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgments
 References cited
 
In south-central Maine, a thin (<120 m) but distinctive metamorphosed Fe- and Mn-rich (grunerite + garnet) unit, the Wilson Cove Member of the Cushing Formation, is exposed discontinuously along strike for a distance of over 75 km (Fig. 1Go). Mineral assemblages in surrounding meta-pelites indicate these rocks were metamorphosed under low-pressure (below the Al2SiO5 triple point), amphibolite-facies conditions. Although considerable work has been published on phase relations in metamorphosed Fe-formations (see Klein 2005 for a recent summary), much less attention has been given to the more aluminous and manganiferous bulk compositions that are characteristic of the Wilson Cove unit. Additionally, recent work on grunerite+garnet-bearing amphibolites has led to a better understanding of amphibolite-facies phase relationships in the system CaO-FeO-MgO-Al2O3-SiO2-H2O (Zeh et al. 2005); however, this model system is not applicable to the Mn-rich bulk compositions of the Wilson Cove unit. Thus, detailed studies of these metamorphosed Fe- and Mn-rich bulk compositions provide an opportunity to apply the techniques of petrologic mineralogy (Guidotti and Sassi 2002) to the investigation of phase relationships in these unusual bulk compositions.


Figure 1
View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 1. Generalized geologic map of south-central Maine showing the distribution of the Wilson Cove Member of the Cushing Formation in the region (modified from Osberg et al. 1985). The width of this unit has been exaggerated on this map for illustrative purposes. The upper box indicates the location of the present study area mapped in detail by West and Peterman (2004) and the lower box shows the Casco Bay region where the unit was originally defined by Hussey (1971).

 
In addition to the petrologic questions surrounding the Wilson Cove rocks, little is known about the protoliths of these unusual bulk compositions. Although direct age constraints are lacking, the rocks have been interpreted to be Ordovician (Hussey and Berry 2002), but of unclear origin. Additionally, there is uncertainty surrounding the provenance (Laurentian vs. peri-Gondwanan) and original tectonic setting of deposition for rocks in this lithotectonic belt. Thus, detailed studies of this unit will not only shed light on the depositional history and subsequent metamorphism of the protoliths, but will also provide important constraints on the tectonic setting of the region in Ordovician time.

In this contribution, we provide insight on the complete geologic history of the metamorphosed Fe- and Mn-rich rocks of the Wilson Cove unit through a multidisciplinary study involving: (1) detailed field and petrographic analysis; (2) mineral chemistry; (3) whole-rock major- and trace-element geochemistry; and (4) U-Pb geochronology. Our approach, long espoused by Charles V. Guidotti, is that there is great value in integrating detailed field and petrographic observations, mineralogy, and mineral chemistry as a function of bulk-rock composition, textural relationships between the minerals, and an understanding of the regional geologic relationships. This integrated approach takes "petrologic mineralogy" (Guidotti and Sassi 2002) a step further by not only providing insight into metamorphic petrogenesis of rocks, but also providing information on the depositional and tectonic setting of the protoliths.


    GEOLOGIC SETTING
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Geologic setting
 Field relationships and...
 Analytical methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgments
 References cited
 
The study area is located in south-central Maine along the southeastern margin of the northern Appalachian orogenic belt (Fig. 1Go). The bedrock geology in this region is complex, having been multiply deformed, metamorphosed, and intruded by several generations of plutons during Silurian-Devonian (Acadian) orogenic activity (Tucker et al. 2001; Hussey and Berry 2002; West et al. 2003; Gerbi and West 2007). The stratified rocks in this region can be divided into several lithotectonic belts based on their ages and internal stratigraphy (Berry and Osberg 1989). Iron-rich rocks of the Wilson Cove Member of the Cushing Formation are located within the Liberty-Orrington belt—an approximately 170 km long northeast-trending belt of metamorphosed Ordovician volcanic and sedimentary rocks. Rocks within this belt have been subjected to multiple phases of ductile deformation and metamorphosed under amphibolite-facies conditions (Guidotti 1989).

Hussey (1971) first described the distinctive Fe-rich rocks of the Wilson Cove Member of the Cushing Formation in the Casco Bay region of southwestern Maine (Fig. 1Go). These rocks are interpreted to represent the uppermost member of the Ordovician Cushing Formation—a unit dominated by metamorphosed volcanic rocks (Hussey and Berry 2002). The Cushing Formation lies stratigraphically beneath the largely metasedimentary Cape Elizabeth Formation. In the Casco Bay region, the Wilson Cove Member shows considerable lithologic variability and ranges in thickness from 0 to 120 m (Hussey 1971, 1985).

In mapping an area approximately 75 km northeast of the Casco Bay region (Fig. 1Go), Pankiwskyj (1976) correlated lithologically similar metamorphosed Fe-rich rocks along the Cushing-Cape Elizabeth Formation contact with the Wilson Cove Member of the Cushing Formation, although these rocks were not continuous with those mapped by Hussey (1971). More detailed mapping in this region by West and Peterman (2004) (Fig. 2Go) has confirmed this correlation and shown the unit to be similarly thin and lithologically variable. In summary, mapping to date has shown that the Wilson Cove Member of the Cushing Formation is a distinctive but lithologically variable unit that is discontinuously exposed along the Cushing-Cape Elizabeth Formation contact for a distance of over 75 km (Fig. 1Go).


Figure 2
View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 2. General geological relationships in the vicinity of the study area (modified from West and Peterman 2004). Multiple samples were collected for geochemical analysis at each of the localities indicated. The sample used for U-Pb geochronology was collected from the northernmost geochemistry sampling locality. The Wilson Cove unit "pinches out" immediately northeast and southwest of this map area.

 

    FIELD RELATIONSHIPS AND PETROGRAPHY
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Geologic setting
 Field relationships and...
 Analytical methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgments
 References cited
 
This study focuses on exposures of the Wilson Cove Member in south-central Maine recently mapped in detail by West and Peterman (2004). Here the unit strikes northeast, dips nearly vertically, and lies between quartzofeldspathic gneisses and amphibolites of the Cushing Formation and feldspathic schists and granofels of the Cape Elizabeth Formation (Fig. 2Go). The stratified rocks in this area have been regionally metamorphosed under amphibolite-facies conditions, and there is no field or petrographic evidence to suggest any pressure or temperature gradients within the immediate study area (Fig. 2Go).

The most common rock type in the Wilson Cove unit is a dark-gray to black, fine- to coarse-grained, moderately to intensely rusty weathering, grunerite + garnet + quartz + biotite ± hornblende gneiss and granofels. Subordinate lithologies include rusty weathering biotite ± garnet schist and biotite-garnet-bearing quartzite. Where not obscured by deep rusty weathering, mineralogical layering (0.5 to 20 cm) is common and characterized by modal variations in garnet, grunerite, quartz, and biotite.

Euhedral to subhedral pale yellow-brown grunerite, up to 1.5 mm in length, is the most common mineral in the unit, but its modal abundance ranges from <5% in quartz-rich samples (Fig. 3aGo) to >60% in garnet rich gneisses (Fig. 3bGo). Poikilitic garnet is ubiquitous, but varies considerably in size (up to 2.5 mm in diameter), crystal form (euhedral to anhedral), and modal abundance (2 to 25%). Inclusions within garnet include quartz, grunerite, apatite, ilmenite, graphite, biotite, and in one sample, stilpnomelane and chlorite. Textures suggestive of multiple stages of growth and radiating patterns of inclusions ("wheel spokes") can be found in some garnets. Biotite up to 0.5 mm in length is modally abundant in quartz-rich samples (up to 15%) and is sparse to absent in samples rich in grunerite and garnet. Dark-green subhedral hornblende, up to 2.0 mm in length, is typically found intergrown with grunerite in samples containing moderate amounts of quartz and biotite. Pale-green hedenbergite, up to 3.0 mm in width, was found in association with hornblende in two samples. Subhedral to anhedral fayalite (Fig. 3cGo), up to 0.3 mm across, constitutes ~5 modal percent of one grunerite-garnet rich sample. Polygonal quartz ± albite aggregates are abundant (up to 30 modal percent) in some samples and absent in the more Fe- and Mn-rich bulk compositions.


Figure 3
View larger version (78K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 3. Photomicrographs showing mineral assemblages and textures from the Wilson Cove unit in south-central Maine. (a) Plane-polarized light view of a relatively SiO2-rich (53 wt%) sample (NB-2b) showing the assemblage grunerite + garnet + quartz + biotite. (b) Cross-polarized light view of a high-Fe2O3(t) (38 wt%) and low-MnO (0.9 wt%) sample (665) showing the assemblage grunerite + garnet + stilpnomelane (only as inclusions in garnet). (c) Cross-polarized light view of a high Fe2O3(t) (38 wt%) and high MnO (12 wt%) sample (NB-2i) showing the assemblage fayalite + grunerite + garnet.

 
Apatite is found in nearly every sample as inclusions <0.1 mm across, but in several samples, layers (micro-beds) up to 1.0 mm thick of quartz ± garnet contain over 60 modal percent apatite. Other accessory minerals are zircon, monazite, tourmaline, and stilpnomelane. Barite in very thin (<0.05 mm) microveinlets, chlorite, and jarosite are secondary. Opaque minerals are ubiquitous and vary in size (up to 2.5 mm across) and modal abundance (up to 3%). Ilmenite and fine-grained graphite are the most common, but magnetite, pyrrhotite, pyrite, chalcopyrite, arsenopyrite, sphalerite, loellingite, and colbaltite are also present; the S and As phases were identified using energy dispersive spectrometry.


    ANALYTICAL METHODS
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Geologic setting
 Field relationships and...
 Analytical methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgments
 References cited
 
A total of 26 Wilson Cove samples were collected for detailed petrographic analysis and every attempt was made to collect samples representative of the full range of rock types within the unit. The sample collected for the U-Pb age determination is a grunerite-garnet-hornblende-biotite-quartz granofels (sample 82M). Zircon was separated from this rock using standard crushing, density, and magnetic methods. Grains were hand-picked from the zircon separate, mounted in epoxy, and imaged using reflected light, transmitted light, and cathodoluminescence (CL: Fig. 4aGo) prior to analysis. U-Pb isotopic analyses were carried out at the U.S.G.S.-Stanford sensitive high-resolution ion microprobe (SHRIMP) under standard operating conditions during sessions in November 2004 and January 2006. We used zircon standard R33 (419.3 ± 0.4 Ma; Black et al. 2004). Data were reduced with Squid (Ludwig 2001) and Isoplot/Ex (Ludwig 2003). All analytical data are reported in Table 1Go and the ages shown in Figures 4b and 4cGo are reported as 206Pb/238U ages. Although the few ages >1 Ga would normally be calculated from the 207Pb/206Pb ratio, many of these older grains are very low in U, and consequently have a high 207Pb uncertainty.


Figure 4
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 4. (a) Cathodoluminescence images of representative zircon grains from sample 82-M. Full grains are shown, with the background removed for clarity. We interpret the lighter cores as being detrital, and the U-rich dark rims as metamorphic overgrowths. Note the concentric zoning in the cores of several of these grains. (b) Tera-Wasserburg plot of all analyses. Spots with gray shading and the cluster of ca. 370 Ma rim ages were not included in the relative probability age calculation. Error ellipses at 2{sigma}. (c) Relative probability plot for detrital zircon cores.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1. SHRIMP U-Pb isotopic data on zircon
 
A total of 14 samples, representing a wide range of bulk compositions identified through field and petrographic analysis, were selected for whole-rock geochemical analysis. A full suite of major- and trace-element analyses (Table 2Go) was completed at Acme Analytical Laboratories Ltd. in Vancouver, British Columbia. Major elements were measured using ICP-emission spectrometry and trace elements were measured using ICP-mass spectrometry. Both methods were completed on fused rock powders and thus the negative loss on ignition (L.O.I.) values observed in some samples was due to the oxidation of Fe during the fusion process. FeO contents were determined separately by titration on non-fused samples; Fe2O3 was calculated by difference from the total Fe2O3 determined on the fused samples. These contents, listed separately in Table 2Go, are not included in the totals because of the difference in weight between fused and non-fused samples.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2. Whole-rock major and trace element analyses from the Wilson Cove unit
 
The chemical compositions of minerals from seven Wilson Cove samples were determined using a Cameca SX-100 electron microprobe at the University of Maine. Prior to quantitative analysis, major and accessory minerals in each thin section were qualitatively characterized with energy dispersive spectrometry and back-scattered electron imaging. All minerals were analyzed using a 15 kV, 10 nA, 5 µm beam. Tourmaline was analyzed separately for B using a 5 kV, 40 nA, 10 µm beam integrating the entire BK{alpha} peak (method given in Grew et. al. 2008). A minimum of five grains of each mineral were analyzed from a given sample and, with the exception of ilmenite, all major minerals exhibited nearly constant compositions within a sample. Each reported analysis represents the average of five spots on a single grain. Silicate and oxide standards were used, and calibrations were tested by analyzing mineral standards as unknowns. Data were processed using the X-Phi correction of Merlet (1994).


    RESULTS
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Geologic setting
 Field relationships and...
 Analytical methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgments
 References cited
 
U-Pb geochronology
Zircon samples uniformly exhibit texturally isolated cores surrounded by high-U (>1400 ppm), low-Th (<10 ppm) rims (Fig. 4aGo). Cores are rounded to subangular and most show concentric zoning. In addition, cores are much lower in U and have higher Th/U ratios (Table 1Go). Rims are homogenous in CL imaging. There is strong textural discordance between the cores and rims.

Core ages range from ca. 463 to 2058 Ma, with a strong peak in the late Neoproterozoic-Early Cambrian (Figs. 4b and 4cGo). Post-SHRIMP imaging revealed that the two youngest core ages (spots 82 m-9b and 82 m-14b, gray ellipses in Fig. 4bGo) are mixed core-rim analyses and are therefore excluded from further discussion. Zircon rims produced a uniform 206Pb/238U age of 373 ± 4 Ma (2{sigma}) with extremely low Th/U ratios (Gerbi and West 2007). All rim analyses are concordant and tightly clustered, implying a single pervasive amphibolite-grade metamorphic event at that time (Gerbi and West 2007).

Whole-rock geochemistry
Standard "Harker-type" bivariate plots of major-element concentrations in the Wilson Cove rocks reveal the whole-rock geochemical variability in the samples analyzed (Fig. 5Go). SiO2 varies considerably from approximately 35 to 60 wt% and, as to be expected, SiO2 concentrations mirror modal amounts of quartz in individual samples. Concentrations of Al2O3 (5.2 to 12.6 wt%), MgO (1.4–4.2 wt%), CaO (0.7–15.1 wt%), Na2O (0.01–1.09 wt%), and K2O (0.04–2.73 wt%) are below average crustal abundances (all quoted average crustal abundances are from Taylor and McLennan 1985) in most of the individual samples analyzed. In contrast, Fe2O3(t), MnO, and P2O5 concentrations are notably elevated. Fe2O3(t) range between 15.3 to 43.5 wt% with the mean (29.6 wt%) being more than three times above the average crustal abundance (9.1 wt%). FeO determinations (Table 2Go) indicate that Fe in the Wilson Cove samples is predominantly ferrous. The presence of ilmenite without hematite exsolution, graphite, sparse magnetite, and low apparent Fe2O3 in garnet are consistent with this finding. MnO concentrations show considerable variability between 0.12 to 12.07 wt% with the mean (2.87 wt%) being more than an order of magnitude greater than average MnO crustal abundances (0.18 wt%). Concentrations of P2O5 vary as a function of modal apatite and range from 0.13 to 3.41 wt% (mean = 0.98 wt%). In summary, the major-element chemistry confirms the extreme variability of the Wilson Cove rocks evident in the field and in the mineral assemblages.


Figure 5
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 5. "Harker-type" variation diagrams for major elements in the Wilson Cove samples.

 
Trace-element concentrations from the analyzed samples show similar variability and the rocks show some notable enrichments relative to average crustal abundances. Specifically, nearly all samples are enriched in Ba (up to 2500 ppm) with the mean (1268 ppm) being well above the average crustal abundance (250 ppm). Barium is located within thin secondary barite veins in some samples, but significant amounts of Ba are also present in most biotite analyses (see below). Base metal concentrations, residing primarily in sulfide minerals, vary considerably (Cu = below detection limits to 258 ppm; Pb = 6 to 218 ppm; and Zn = 14 to 335 ppm), with Pb, and to a lesser extent Zn, contents generally exceeding average crustal abundances. Arsenic is greatly elevated in the Wilson Cove samples (7 to 1161 ppm) with the mean As concentration (333 ppm) being well above the average crustal abundance (1 ppm). Arsenic-bearing phases arsenopyrite and loellingite were identified in many of the Wilson Cove samples using the electron microprobe.

Mineral chemistry
Amphibole.
All the analyzed samples contain grunerite, and sample 82-m also contains calcic amphibole (Table 3Go). Grunerite XMg [= atomic Mg/(Mg + Fe)] ranges from 0.01 to 0.36. Manganese contents vary from 0.75 atoms per formula unit (apfu) in sample NB-2i to below the limit of detection in sample NB-4b, and thus none of the analyzed grunerite can be classified as manganogrunerite according to Leake et al. (1997). CaO and Al2O3 vary from 0.2 to 0.9 wt% and 0.3 to 1.0 wt%, respectively.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 3. Representative analyses of amphibole
 
The calcic amphibole in sample 82-m is ferro-edenite (Leake et al. 1997). Its XMg is close to that in the grunerite in sample 82-m but has higher Ti, V, and Cr, and lower Mn.

Garnet.
Garnet compositions vary significantly from sample to sample but are uniform in composition within a given sample (Table 4Go). Almandine is dominant. Low Fe+3 contents are suggested by formula recalculations assuming 16 cations and 24 O atoms. Garnet rim and core compositions are quite similar within a sample and no systematic variations of Ca, Mn, or XMg are present. Garnets from samples 82-b, NB-1a, and apatite veins in NB-2f have core Y2O3-contents varying from 0.05 to 0.5 wt% with undetectable Y2O3 in the rims. Texturally distinct garnet grains from within an apatite micro-bed in sample NB-2f are virtually identical in composition to garnet grains in the rest of the sample.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 4. Representative analyses of garnet
 
Biotite and stilpnomelane.
Representative biotite and stilpnomelane analyses are presented in Table 5Go. Biotite is found in all samples except NB-2i. XMg in biotite varies from 0.08 to 0.25, whereas MnO-content varies from below detection in NB-4b to 0.52 wt% in NB-1a. Biotite contains little F, Cl, and Na, but considerable TiO2 (2.66–5.37 wt%). In addition, biotite is noticeably enriched in BaO, which varies from 1.08 to 5.19 wt%.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 5. Representative analysis of biotite and stilpnomelane
 
Stilpnomelane in association with Fe-chlorite is enclosed in garnet in sample 665. The composition varies little from one inclusion to another. It is strongly enriched in FeO over MgO and MnO, and contains 0.29 and 0.79 wt% CaO and BaO, respectively, accompanying K2O in the alkali site.

Other minerals.
Manganese-rich fayalite, (Fe1.44Mg0.13Mn0.39) SiO4, is present only in NB-2i where it is in textural equilibrium with garnet and grunerite (Fig. 3cGo). All analyzed samples contain ilmenite except NB-2b, whereas only samples NB-2d and NB-2i contain magnetite. The MnO content of ilmenite varies from 0.29 to 14.35 wt%. All ilmenite grains have 0.1 to 0.2 wt% Nb2O5 and many of the samples contain detectable amounts of ZnO. Magnetite is relatively pure in NB-2d but contains up to 0.59 wt% TiO2, 0.55 wt% MnO, and 0.33 wt% Al2O3 in sample NB-2i. Tourmaline, which is found only in sample NB-4b, is schorl (Na0.43Ca0.24)(Fe3.05 Mg0.20Ti0.09)Al5.68B3.1Si5.86O27(OH)4 with MnO, F, and Cl below detection limits.


    DISCUSSION
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Geologic setting
 Field relationships and...
 Analytical methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgments
 References cited
 
Depositional environment
Rocks of the Wilson Cove Member of the Cushing Formation can be classified as metamorphosed ironstones as they satisfy the accepted definition of ironstone (rocks containing >15% Fe, or 21.3 wt% Fe2O3; Young 1989). Ironstones of Phanerozoic age are known to have formed in a variety of depositional settings, e.g., through the erosion and re-deposition of lateritic soils in shallow marine environments (typically forming ooidal ironstones), through hydrogenous processes (i.e., adsorption of elements from seawater onto particle surfaces), and through precipitation from hydrothermal fluids (volcanic exhalatives) (Young and Taylor 1989). Although distinctions between these different settings can often be made through differences in primary mineral assemblages and textures, these primary features have been obliterated in the Wilson Cove rocks due to the combined effects of penetrative ductile deformation and amphibolite-facies metamorphism. Fortunately, clues as to the original depositional settings of ironstones can be deciphered from whole-rock geochemical data.

Although the Ordovician is known to be one of the greatest periods of ooidal ironstone deposition in Earth history (Van Houten and Arthur 1989), the geochemistry of the Wilson Cove rocks is inconsistent with this type of depositional setting. Specifically, ooidal ironstones are typically characterized by significantly lower SiO2 and MnO, and higher P2O5 concentrations (Mücke and Farshad 2005) than are found in the Wilson Cove samples. Additionally, ooidal ironstones typically contain very little detrital clastic material (Bhattacharyya and Crerar 1993), a component we will argue is abundant in many of the Wilson Cove rocks (see below). Thus, several lines of evidence suggest that the metamorphosed Fe- and Mn-rich rocks of the Wilson Cove unit were not originally deposited as ooidal ironstones.

Distinguishing a hydrogenous from a submarine hydrothermal origin is made possible by applying geochemical discrimination diagrams. The geochemical data from the Wilson Cove rocks plot consistently within the field of submarine-hydrothermal deposits (Fig. 6aGo) because elements known to be concentrated through hydrogenous processes, e.g., Ni and Co (Usui and Someya 1997), are relatively low in the Wilson Cove rocks. Patterns of rare earth elements (REE) in Fe-Mn deposits have also been used to distinguish between hydrothermal and hydrogenous sources (e.g., Nath et al. 1997). Chondrite-normalized REE patterns of most Wilson Cove samples are relatively consistent and characterized by relative enrichment in light REEs, a slight enrichment in Ce, and a negative Eu anomaly. Although a negative Ce anomaly is characteristic of many hydrothermal Fe-Mn deposits (Elderfield and Greaves 1981), its absence does not preclude a hydrothermal origin; Ce behavior depends on proximity of the hydrothermal source, local redox conditions, and/or contamination by a hydrogenetic or detrital source (Toth 1980; Hein et al. 1994). Overall, most geochemical signatures from the Wilson Cove rocks are supportive of a submarine hydrothermal origin. Specifically, modern submarine volcanogenic exhalations are often rich in both Fe and Mn (e.g., Bonatti et al. 1972; Barrett 1987; Buatier et al. 2004) and the relatively high amounts of As, Ba, and base metals are consistent with a hydrothermal origin (e.g., Price and Pichler 2005; Canet et al. 2005).


Figure 6
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 6. (a) Fe-Mn-(Co + Ni + Cu + Zn) x 10 ternary diagram used to differentiate between submarine hydrothermal and hydrogeneous deposits (after Bonatti et al. 1972; Mücke 2005). (b) Chondrite-normalized (Nakamura 1974) rare-earth element plot for the Wilson Cove samples.

 
Although rocks of the Wilson Cove unit are enriched in constituents associated with hydrothermal processes (e.g., Fe, Mn, As, Ba, Pb, Zn), other features suggest detrital contributions to the protolith; for example, the morphology and age distribution of the Zircon samples (Fig. 4Go). Positive correlations between elements that are commonly associated with detrital contributions (e.g., Al2O3, TiO2, and Zr; Fig. 7aGo) are supportive of a detrital component. In addition, the light REE enrichments and negative Eu anomalies present in the Wilson Cove samples (Fig. 6bGo) are typical of sedimentary material (Taylor and McLennan 1985). The relative contributions of hydrothermal vs. detrital sediment are further illustrated in Figure 7bGo where the Wilson Cove whole-rock compositions plot on a mixing curve between metalliferous and detrital sediments. Thus, both the lithologic and geochemical variability of the Wilson Cove rocks most likely reflects different proportions of material derived from hydrothermal exhalations and terrestrially derived detritus.


Figure 7
View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 7. (a) Bivariate plots of Wilson Cove whole-rock geochemical data showing the strong correlations between constituents characteristic of sedimentary detritus. (b) Composition of the Wilson Cove meta-ironstones in terms of Fe/Ti vs. Al/(Al + Fe + Mn). For reference, a mixing line between East Pacific Rise metalliferous sediment and terrigenous and pelagic sediment is shown (diagram is modified from Wonder et al. 1988; Peter and Goodfellow 1996; Lottermoser and Ashley 2000).

 
Depositional age and source region provenance
The U-Pb zircon data presented earlier provide important constraints on both the depositional age of the Wilson Cove rocks and information on the provenance of the detritus. The widely varying core ages, compositions, and textures indicate a mixed age source rather than a homogeneous igneous terrane. The youngest detrital age of 463 ± 6 Ma (1{sigma}) constrains the depositional age of the ironstone to latest Middle Ordovician (Llanvirn) or younger. This age is somewhat younger than, but considering analytical uncertainties, is consistent with the age reported for the underlying Peaks Island Member of the Cushing Formation (471 ± 3 Ma, Hussey and Berry 2002). In addition, Middle Ordovician ironstones and hydrothermal sedimentary rocks similar in composition to that of the Wilson Cove are found along strike to the northeast in the Miramichi highlands of northern New Brunswick (Bathurst Mining Camp: Peter and Goodfellow 1996; Peter et al. 2003). Interestingly, these likely correlative rocks are divided into two types in New Brunswick: (1) older (~469 Ma) carbonate-bearing ironstones associated with massive sulfide deposits, and (2) younger (465–469 Ma) Mn-rich ironstones not associated with massive sulfides (Goodfellow et al. 2003). The Wilson Cove geochemistry and U-Pb geochronology, along with the absence of significant sulfides, suggest these rocks correlate with the latter type defined by Goodfellow et al. (2003).

The distribution of detrital zircon core ages, with a dominant Neoproterozoic population and a low density of Grenville ages, suggests that the sediment was derived from peri-Gondwanan material (Fig. 4cGo). Major peaks in the age distribution of zircon grains shed from pre-Appalachian Laurentia fall in the ranges 900–1200, 1600–1800, and 2400–2600 Ma (e.g., Cawood and Nemchin 2001). In contrast, Gondwanan-derived material contains ages in some or all of the following ranges: 600–800, 1200–1600, and 2000–2300 Ma (e.g., van Staal et al. 2004). A peri-Gondwanan (i.e., Gander) source for rocks of Casco Bay Group is consistent with the interpretations of West et al. (2004), which were based on the isotopic compositions of metamorphosed volcanic rocks just to the east of this study area.

Marine hydrothermal exhalative deposits mixed with terrigenous clastic sediment form in rather restricted tectonic settings and this knowledge, combined with the depositional age and sedimentary provenance information provided by the U-Pb zircon data, place important constraints on the tectonics of the Liberty-Orrington belt in Middle Ordovician time. Fe-Mn rich hydrothermal deposition has been documented in a variety of modern tectonic settings including submarine volcanic arc and backarc rift systems (Usui and Someya 1997), triple junctions (Nath et al. 1997), and continental margin extension (Canet et al. 2005). The Wilson Cove unit lies stratigraphically above a sequence of metamorphosed subaqueous felsic to intermediate volcanic rocks (Hussey and Berry 2002; Levy et al. 2003) and below a thick sequence of metamorphosed volcanogenic sedimentary rocks (Cape Elizabeth Formation). This association is consistent with an active oceanic arc or back-arc environment, with the abundance of terrestrial detritus suggesting proximity to an actively eroding continental source.

As discussed above, meta-ironstones of the Wilson Cove Member of the Cushing Formation are correlative with rocks of similar age and composition in northern New Brunswick, which van Staal et al. (2003) have interpreted to have been deposited in an evolving back-arc basin immediately adjacent to peri-Gondwanan (Ganderian) crust. Additionally, West et al. (2004) suggested that the Liberty-Orrington belt in Maine, which is composed largely of metamorphosed volcanic and volcanogenic sedimentary rocks, represents a southern extension of this Middle Ordovician back-arc basin. The Wilson Cove whole-rock geochemistry and U-Pb geochronology presented here are consistent with the existence of a Middle Ordovician back-arc basin adjacent to a peri-Gondwanan crustal source.

Metamorphism and phase relationships
West et al. (2003), in a detailed study of pelitic rocks approximately 10 km to the east of the present study site, concluded that the area was subjected to regional metamorphism under low-pressure, amphibolite-facies conditions (specifically 550–600 °C and 3–4 kbar based on petrogenetic grid constraints). The mineral assemblages observed in the Wilson Cove unit (e.g., garnet + grunerite) are consistent with these pressure-temperature conditions (Zeh et al. 2005). Although the grunerite + garnet + fayalite assemblage found in the Wilson Cove rocks is only stable in a very narrow stability field in the petrogenetic grid of Zeh et al. (2005), it occurs only in the most manganiferous sample analyzed (NB-2i = 12.1 wt% MnO). Thus, a more precise pressure-temperature estimation based solely on the Wilson Cove mineral assemblages is hindered by components (e.g., MnO, K2O) not considered in available petrogenetic grids for Fe-rich rocks (e.g., the CaO-FeO-MgO-Al2O3-SiO2-H2O petrogenetic grid of Zeh et al. 2005).

U-Pb SHRIMP analysis of metamorphic zircon rims from the Wilson Cove unit (Fig. 4Go) indicate that this metamorphism took place in Middle to Late Devonian time (373 ± 4 Ma), consistent with the later stages of Acadian orogenesis in the region (West et al. 1995; Gerbi and West 2007). Although textural evidence for polymetamorphism is widespread in the region (Novak and Holdaway 1981; West et al. 2003), our detailed studies of the Wilson Cove unit have revealed little indication of more than one metamorphic event. Equilibrium textures, regular distribution of Fe, Mn, and Mg among minerals (see below), and a single age of metamorphic zircon growth all argue for a close approach to equilibrium during a single metamorphic event. The only evidence to the contrary is the finding of stilpnomelane as small inclusions within garnet porphyroblasts in one sample. The upper stability of stilpnomelane in ironstones is less than 500 °C (Miyano and Klein 1989), and thus its presence in these rocks is likely a relic of lower-grade, greenschist-facies conditions. Whether the stilpnomelane grew during an earlier distinct, greenschist-facies metamorphic event that was subsequently overprinted, or whether it represents a lower-temperature phase that grew during the prograde path, is unclear.

Mg/Fe decreases in the order grunerite > biotite > garnet (Fig. 8aGo), whereas Mn/Fe decreases in the order garnet > ilmenite > grunerite > biotite (Fig. 8bGo). Linear Mg/Fe and Mn/Fe compositional relationships between garnet, biotite, grunerite, and to a lesser extent ilmenite (Fig. 8Go), are consistent with a close approach to chemical equilibrium in the samples. However, Y zoning in garnet indicates that the distribution of at least one component did not achieve equilibrium.


Figure 8
View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 8. Distribution coefficients between average ilmenite, grunerite, and biotite composition with respect to average garnet composition. (a) Kd = (Mg/Fe)mineral/(Mg/Fe)garnet for grunerite (solid circle) and biotite (open circle). (b) Kd = (Mn/Fe)mineral/(Mn/Fe)garnet for ilmenite (open diamond), grunerite (solid circle), and biotite (open circle). R2 = linear regression coefficient. Intrasample standard deviation shown as brackets when greater than symbol diameter.

 
The variable mixing of hydrothermal and clastic components during the original deposition of the Wilson Cove unit has resulted in considerable variability in bulk-rock composition. The mineral assemblages, mineral modes, and the compositions of individual minerals in the Wilson Cove unit are strongly controlled by these bulk-rock compositional variations. For example, modal quartz varies systematically as a function of whole-rock SiO2 content. More significantly, variations in whole-rock Fe, Mn, and Mg contents have a profound effect on mineral chemistry. The linear relationships in Figure 8Go illustrate the first-order influence of bulk rock Fe-Mn-Mg composition on the compositions of these individual mineral phases. In addition, the compositions of co-existing garnet and grunerite (Fig. 9Go) vary systematically as a function of whole-rock MnO concentration, a relationship consistent with equilibrium distribution of Fe, Mn, and Mg. As would be expected, Mn is strongly partitioned into garnet, but grunerite also shows noticeable compositional variation as a function of whole-rock Mn-Fe-Mg concentrations.


Figure 9
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 9. Mn-Mg-Fe ternary plot of co-existing garnet (solid circles) and grunerite (open circles) compositions from the analyzed Wilson Cove samples. The MnO values listed on the diagram indicate whole-rock MnO contents in wt% (from Table 2Go). The lowest Mn samples on the diagram have whole-rock MnO contents of 0.85, 0.46, and 0.12 wt%, respectively. The absence of crossing tie lines is consistent with approach to chemical equilibrium.

 


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Geologic setting
 Field relationships and...
 Analytical methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgments
 References cited
 
Funding for this work was provided by the National Science Foundation (EAR-027263) and the Maine Geological Survey through the STATEMAP program. The Cameca SX-100 was purchased through NSF grant MRI-0116235. We acknowledge the help of Emily Peterman with fieldwork, Ray Coish with interpretations of geochemical data, and Joe Wooden with SHRIMP analyses. Formal reviews by Pete Dahl and Ed Grew greatly improved the manuscript. Finally, the authors are indebted to C.V. Guidotti for instilling his love of metamorphic rocks in Maine.


    Footnotes
 
MANUSCRIPT HANDLED BY EDWARD GREW

MANUSCRIPT RECEIVED February 2, 2007; MANUSCRIPT ACCEPTED July 12, 2007


    REFERENCES CITED
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Geologic setting
 Field relationships and...
 Analytical methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Acknowledgments
 References cited
 

Barrett, T.J. (1987) Metalliferous sediments from DSDP Leg 92: The East Pacific Rise transect. Geochemica et Cosmochimica Acta, 51, 2241–2253.[CrossRef]

Berry, H.N. IV and Osberg, P.H. (1989) A stratigraphic synthesis of eastern Maine and western New Brunswick. In R.D. Tucker and R.G. Marvinney, Eds., Studies in Maine geology, 2, p. 1–32. Maine Geological Survey, Augusta.

Bhattacharyya, D.P. and Crerar, D.A. (1993) Genetic model for the Phanerozoic oolitic ironstones and some speculations about its implications for the deposition of banded iron formation. Proceedings National Academy Sciences, India, 63(A), 48–72.

Black, L.P., Kamo, S.L., Allen, C.M., Davis, D.W., Aleinikoff, J.N., Valley, J.W., Mundil, R., Campbell, I.H., Korsch, R.J., Williams, I.S., and Foudoulis, C. (2004) Improved 206Pb/238U microprobe geochronology by the monitoring of a trace-element related matrix effect; SHRIMP, ID-TIMS, ELA-ICP-MS and oxygen isotope documentation for a series of zircon standards. Chemical Geology, 205, 115–140.[CrossRef][ISI][GeoRef]

Bonatti, E., Kraemer, T., and Rydell, H. (1972) Classification and genesis of submarine iron-manganese deposits. In D.R. Horn, Ed., Conference on ferromanganese deposits on the ocean floor, p. 149–166. Arden House, New York.

Buatier, M.D., Guillaume, D., Wheat, C.G., Hervé, L., and Adatte, T. (2004) Mineralogical characterization and genesis of hydrothermal Mn oxides from the flank of the Juan de Fuca Ridge. American Mineralogist, 89, 1807–1815.[Abstract/Free Full Text][ISI][GeoRef]

Canet, C., Prol-Ledesma, R.M., Proenza, J.A., Rubio-Ramos, M.A., Forrest, M.J., Torres-Vera, M.A., and Rodriguez-Diaz, A.A. (2005) Mn-Ba-Hg mineralization at shallow submarine hydrothermal vents in Bahia Concepcion, Baja California Sur, Mexico. Chemical Geology, 224, 96–112.[CrossRef][ISI][GeoRef]

Cawood, P.A. and Nemchin, A.A. (2001) Paleogeographic development of the east Laurentian margin: Constraints from U-Pb dating of detrital zircons in the Newfoundland Appalachians. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 113, 234–1246.

Elderfield, H. and Greaves, M.J. (1981) Negative cerium anomalies in the rare earth element patterns of oceanic ferromanganese nodules. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 55, 163–170.[CrossRef][ISI][GeoRef]

Gerbi, C. and West, D.P., Jr. (2007) Use of U-Pb geochronology to identify successive, spatially overlapping tectonic episodes during Silurian-Devonian orogenesis in south-central Maine, USA. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 119, 1218–1231.[Abstract/Free Full Text][CrossRef][ISI][GeoRef]

Goodfellow, W.D., McCutcheon, S.R., and Peter, J.M. (2003) Massive sulfide deposits of the Bathurst Mining Camp, New Brunswick and northern Maine: Introduction and Summary of Findings. Economic Geology Monograph, 11, 1–16.

Grew, E.S., Graetsch, H.A., Pöter, B., Yates, M.G., Buick, I, Bernhardt H.-J., Schreyer, W., Werding, G., Carson, C.J., and Clarke, G.L. (2008) Boralsilite, Al16B6Si2O37, and "boron-mullite": Compositional variations and associated phases in experiment and nature. American Mineralogist, 93, 283–298.[Abstract/Free Full Text][CrossRef][GeoRef]

Guidotti, C.V. (1989) Metamorphism in Maine: an overview. In R.D. Tucker, and R.G. Marvinney, Eds., Studies in Maine Geology, 3, p. 1–17. Maine Geological Survey, Augusta.

Guidotti, C.V. and Sassi, F.P. (2002) Constraints on studies in metamorphic K-Na white micas. In A. Mottana, F.P. Sassi, J.B. Thompson, and S. Guggenheim, Eds., Micas: Crystal Chemistry and Metamorphic Petrology, 46, p. 413–448. Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, Mineralogical Society of America, Chantilly, Virginia.

Hein, J.R., Yeh, H-W., Gunn, S.H., Gibbs, A.E., and Wang, C.-H. (1994) Composition and origin of hydrothermal ironstones from central Pacific seamounts. Geochemica et Cosmochimica Acta, 58, 179–189.[CrossRef]

Hussey, A.M., II (1971) Geologic map and cross sections of the Orrs Island 7.5' quadrangle and adjacent area, Maine. Maine Geological Survey, Geologic Map Series GM-2, Scale 1:24,000 and 18 p. report.

——— (1985) The bedrock geology of the Bath and Portland 2° map sheets, Maine. Maine Geological Survey Open-File Report 85–87, 82 p., and 1:250,000 scale maps.

Hussey, A.M., II and Berry, H.N., IV (2002) Bedrock geology of the Bath 1:100,000 map sheet, coastal Maine. Maine Geological Survey Bulletin 42, 50 p.

Klein, C. (2005) Some Precambrian banded iron-formations (BIFs) from around the world: Their age, geologic setting, mineralogy, metamorphism, geochemistry, and origin. American Mineralogist, 90, 1473–1499.[Abstract/Free Full Text][CrossRef][ISI][GeoRef]

Leake, B.E., Woolley, A.R., Arps, C.E.S., Birch, W.D., Gilbert, M.C., Grice, J.D., Hawthorne, F.C., Kato, A., Mandarino, J.A., Maresch, W.V., Nikel, E.H., Rock, N.M.S., Schumacher, J.C., Smith, D.C., Stephenson, N.C.N., Ungaretti, L., Whittaker, E.J.W., and Youzhi, G. (1997) Nomenclature of amphiboles: Report on the Subcommittee on Amphiboles of the International Mineralogical Association Commission on New Minerals and Mineral Names. American Mineralogist, 82, 1019–1037.[Abstract][ISI][GeoRef]

Levy, B.M., Beane, R.J., and Hussey, A.M., II (2003) The Peaks Island member of the Cushing Formation interpreted as a subaqueous volcanic flow succession in southeastern Maine. Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Programs, 35, 5.

Lottermoser, B.G. and Ashley, P.M. (2000) Geochemistry, petrology and origin of Neoproterozoic ironstones in the eastern part of the Adelaide Geosyncline, South Australia. Precambrian Research, 101, 49–67.[CrossRef][ISI][GeoRef]

Ludwig, K.R. (2001) Squid: Special Publication No. 2. Berkeley Geochronology Center, California.

——— (2003) Isoplot/Ex. Special Publication No. 4. Berkeley Geochronology Center, California.

Merlet, C. (1994) Quantitative electron probe microanalysis: new accurate {phi}({rho}z) description. Mikrochimica Acta, 12, 107–115.

Miyano, T. and Klein, C. (1989) Phase equilibria in the system K2O-FeO-MgO-Al2O3-SiO2-H2O and the stability limit of stilpnomelane in metamorphosed Precambrian iron-formations. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 102, 478–491.[CrossRef][ISI][GeoRef]

Mücke, A. (2005) The Nigerian manganese-rich iron-formations and their host rocks—from sedimentation to metamorphism. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 41, 407–436.[CrossRef][GeoRef]

Mücke, A. and Farshad, F. (2005) Whole-rock and mineralogical composition of Phanerozoic ooidal ironstones: Comparison and differentiation of types and subtypes. Ore Geology Reviews, 26, 227–262.[CrossRef][ISI][GeoRef]

Nakamura, N. (1974) Determination of REE, Ba, Fe, Mg, Na and K in carbonaceous and ordinary chondrites. Geochemica et Cosmochimica Acta, 38, 757–775.[CrossRef]

Nath, B.N., Plüger, W.L., and Roelandts, I. (1997) Geochemical constraints on the hydrothermal origin of ferromanganese encrustations from the Rodriguez Triple Junction, Indian Ocean. In K. Nicholson, J.R. Hein, B. Bühn, and S. Dasgupta, Eds., Manganese mineralization: Geochemistry and mineralogy of terrestrial and marine deposits. Geological Society Special Publication, 119, 199–211.[Abstract/Free Full Text][CrossRef][GeoRef]

Novak, J.M. and Holdaway, M.J. (1981) Metamorphic petrology, mineral equilibria, and polymetamorphism in the Augusta quadrangle, south-central Maine. American Mineralogist, 56, 51–69.

Osberg, P.H., Hussey, A.M., II, and Boone, G.M. (1985) Bedrock geologic map of Maine. Maine Geological Survey, Scale 1:500,000.

Pankiwskyj, K.A. (1976) Preliminary report on the geology of the Liberty 15' quadrangle and adjoining parts of the Burnham, Brooks, Belfast, and Vassalboro quadrangles in south-central Maine. Maine Geological Survey Open-File Report 76–29, 8 p. and 1:62,500 scale map.

Peter, J.M. and Goodfellow, W.D. (1996) Mineralogy, bulk and rare earth element geochemistry of massive sulphide-associated hydrothermal sediments of the Brunswick Horizon, Bathurst Mining Camp, New Brunswick. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 33, 252–283.[GeoRef]

Peter, J.M., Goodfellow, W.D., and Doherty, W. (2003) Hydrothermal sedimentary rocks of the Heath Steele Belt, Bathurst Mining Camp, New Brunswick: Part 2. Bulk rare earth element geochemistry and implications for origin. Economic Geology Monograph, 11, 391–415.

Price, R.E. and Pichler, T. (2005) Distribution, speciation and bioavailability of arsenic in a shallow-water submarine hydrothermal system, Tutum Bay, Ambitle Island, PNG. Chemical Geology, 224, 122–135.[CrossRef][ISI][GeoRef]

Taylor, S.R. and McLennan, S.M. (1985) The Continental Crust: Its Composition and Evolution, 312 p. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.

Toth, J.R. (1980) Deposition of submarine crusts rich in manganese and iron. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 91, 44–54.[CrossRef][ISI]

Tucker, R.D., Osberg, P.H., and Berry, H.N., IV (2001) The geology of a part of Acadia and the nature of the Acadian orogeny across central and eastern Maine. American Journal of Science, 301, 205–260.[Abstract/Free Full Text][CrossRef][ISI][GeoRef]

Usui, A. and Someya, M. (1997) Distribution and composition of marine hydrogenetic and hydrothermal manganese deposits in the northwest Pacific. In K. Nicholson, J.R. Hein, B. Bühn, and S. Dasgupta, Eds., Manganese Mineralization: Geochemistry and Mineralogy of Terrestrial and Marine Deposits. Geological Society Special Publication, 119, 177–198.[Abstract/Free Full Text][CrossRef][GeoRef]

Van Houten, F.B. and Arthur, M.A. (1989) Temporal patterns among Phanerozoic oolitic ironstones and oceanic anoxia. In P.P. Young and W.E.G. Taylor, Eds., Phanerozoic ironstones. Geological Society Special Publication, 46, 33–49.[Abstract/Free Full Text][CrossRef][GeoRef]

van Staal, C.R., Wilson, R.A., Rogers, N., Fyffe, L.R., Langton, J.P., McCutcheon, S.R., McNicoll, V., and Ravenhurst, C.E. (2003) Geology and tectonic history of the Bathurst Supergroup, Bathurst Mining Camp and its relationships to rocks in southwestern New Brunswick and adjacent Maine: A synthesis. Economic Geology Monograph, 11, 37–60.

van Staal, C.R., McNicoll, V., Valverde-Vaquero, P., Barr, S.M., Fyffe, L.R., and Reusch, D.N. (2004) Ganderia, Avalonia, and the Salinic and Acadian orogenies. Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Programs, 36, 2, 128.

West, D.P., Jr. and Peterman, E.M. (2004) Bedrock geology of the Razorville quadrangle, Maine. Maine Geological Survey Open File Map 04-29, Scale 1:24,000.

West, D.P., Jr., Guidotti, C.V., and Lux, D.R. (1995) Silurian orogenesis in the western Penobscot Bay region, Maine. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 32, 1845–1858.[GeoRef]

West, D.P., Jr., Beal, H.M., and Grover, T.W. (2003) Silurian deformation and metamorphism of Ordovician arc rocks of the Casco Bay Group, south-central Maine. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 40, 887–905.[GeoRef]

West, D.P., Jr., Coish, R.A., and Tomascak, P.B. (2004) Tectonic setting and regional correlation of Ordovician metavolcanic rocks of the Casco Bay Group, Maine: evidence from trace element and isotope geochemistry. Geological Magazine, 141, 125–140.[Abstract/Free Full Text][CrossRef][ISI][GeoRef]

Wonder, J.D., Spry, P.G., and Windom, K.E. (1988) Geochemistry and origin of manganese-rich rocks related to iron-formation and sulfide deposits. Economic Geology, 83, 1070–1081.[Abstract][ISI][GeoRef]

Young, T.P. (1989) Phanerozoic ironstone: an introduction and review. In P.P. Young and W.E.G. Taylor, Eds., Phanerozoic ironstones. Geological Society Special Publication, 46, IX–XXV.

Young T.P. and Taylor, W.E.G. (1989) Phanerozoic ironstones. Geological Society Special Publication, 46, 251 p.

Zeh, A., Holland, T.J.B., and Klemd, R. (2005) Phase relationships in grunerite-garnet-bearing amphibolites in the system CFMASH, with applications to metamorphic rocks from the Central Zone of the Limpopo Belt, South Africa. Journal of Metamorphic Geology, 23, 1–17.[CrossRef][ISI][GeoRef]



This Article
Right arrow Abstract
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by West, D. P. </