Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
American Mineralogist
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

American Mineralogist; November-December 2009; v. 94; no. 11-12; p. 1505-1519; DOI: 10.2138/am.2009.3246
© 2009 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Abstract
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dong, H.
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, G.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Microbe-clay mineral interactions

Hailiang Dong1,2,3,*, Deb P. Jaisi4, Jinwook Kim5 and Gengxin Zhang6

1 Key Laboratory of Biogeology and Environmental Geology of Ministry of Education, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, 430074, China
2 Geomicrobiology Laboratory, State Key Laboratory of Geological Processes and Mineral Resources, China University of Geosciences, Beijing, 100083, China
3 Department of Geology, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio 45056, U.S.A.
4 Department of Geology and Geophysics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, U.S.A.
5 Department of Earth System Sciences, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea
6 Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, U.S.A.

Correspondence: * E-mail: dongh{at}muohio.edu


    ABSTRACT
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Microorganisms used in...
 Clay minerals used in...
 Rate and extent of...
 Relative reducibility of Fe(iii)...
 Mechanisms of microbial...
 Mineral transformations as a...
 Field demonstration of microbial...
 Application of reduced clay...
 Future perspectives
 Acknowledgments
 References cited
 
Clays and clay minerals are common components in soils, sediments, and sedimentary rocks, and they play an important role in many environmental processes. Iron is ubiquitous in clays and clay minerals and its oxidation state, in part, controls the physical and chemical properties of these fine-grained minerals. The structural ferric iron in clay minerals can be reduced either chemically or biologically. Biological reductants include mesophilic and thermophilic microorganisms from diverse environments such as soils, sediments, sedimentary rocks, and hydrothermal hot springs. Multiple clay minerals have been used for microbial reduction studies, including dioctahedral smectiteillite series, palygorskite, chlorite, and their various mixtures in natural soils and sediments. All of these clay minerals are reducible by microorganisms under various conditions with smectite (nontronite) being the most reducible and illite the least. The rate and extent of bioreduction depends on many experimental factors, such as the type of microorganisms and clay minerals, solution chemistry, and temperature. Despite significant efforts, current understanding of the mechanisms of microbial reduction of ferric iron in clay minerals is still limited. Whereas some studies have presented evidence for a solid-state reduction mechanism, others argue that the clay mineral structure partially dissolves when the extent of reduction is high. This inconsistency may be related to several experimental conditions, and their specific effects are discussed in this paper. Whereas past experiments have been largely conducted in well-controlled laboratory systems, recent efforts have attempted to transfer knowledge to the field to improve our understanding of more complex soil systems for better agricultural practices. Biologically reduced clay minerals are also important agents in remediating inorganic and organic contaminants in soil and groundwater systems. This paper reviews the most recent developments and suggests some directions for future research.

Key Words: Bacteria • illite • mechanism • microbial Fe(III) reduction • nontronite • smectite


    INTRODUCTION
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Microorganisms used in...
 Clay minerals used in...
 Rate and extent of...
 Relative reducibility of Fe(iii)...
 Mechanisms of microbial...
 Mineral transformations as a...
 Field demonstration of microbial...
 Application of reduced clay...
 Future perspectives
 Acknowledgments
 References cited
 
Clays and clay minerals are ubiquitous in soils, sediments, and sedimentary rocks. They play an important role in environmental processes such as nutrient cycling, plant growth, contaminant migration, organic matter maturation, and petroleum production (Dong 2005; Moore and Reynolds 1997; Stucki 2006). Iron is the fourth most abundant element in the Earth’s crust and is ubiquitous in clays and clay minerals (Horne 1978; Moore and Reynolds 1997; Stucki 2006; Stumm and Sulzberger 1992). The changes in the oxidation state of the structural iron in clay minerals, in part, control their physical and chemical properties in natural environments, such as clay particle flocculation, dispersion, swelling, hydraulic conductivity, surface area, cation and anion exchange capacity, and reactivity toward organic and inorganic contaminants (Jaisi 2007; Kim et al. 2005; Stucki 2006; Stucki and Kostka 2006; Stucki et al. 2002). For example, as a result of Fe(III) reduction to Fe(II), specific surface area of clay minerals decreases, cation exchange capacity (CEC) increases, and swelling in water decreases (Stucki 2006; Stucki and Kostka 2006).

The structural ferric iron in clay minerals can be reduced either chemically or biologically. Many different chemical reductants have been used in the past, but the most commonly used agent is dithionite (Stucki 2006). Biological reductants are bacteria, including dissimilatory iron-reducing prokaryotes (DIRP) and sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB). A wide variety of DIRP have been used to reduce ferric iron in clay minerals, including mesophilic, thermophilic, and hyperthermophilic prokaryotes. Likewise, multiple clay minerals have been used for microbial-reduction studies, including smectite, nontronite (an iron-rich smectite variety), illite, mixed-layer illite/smectite, chlorite, vermiculite, palygorskite, and their various mixtures. All of these clay minerals are reducible by microorganisms under various conditions with smectite (nontronite) being the most reducible and illite the least.

The kinetics of Fe(III) reduction in clay minerals is measured by wet chemistry, and their subsequent physico-chemical changes are typically characterized by X-ray diffraction, scanning and transmission electron microscopy, Mössbauer spectroscopy, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), UV-vis spectroscopy, and synchrotron-based techniques. Reduced smectites (nontronites) are reactive towards various organic and inorganic contaminants. Degradable organic contaminants include pesticides, solvents, explosives, and nitroaromatic and polychlorinated compounds. Inorganic contaminants include heavy metals such as Cr(VI), U(VI), and Tc(VII).

Despite significant efforts, current understanding of mechanisms of microbial reduction of ferric iron in clay minerals is still limited. Whereas some studies have presented evidence for a solid-state reduction mechanism (Kashefi et al. 2008; Lee et al. 2006; Stucki and Kostka 2006), others argue that the clay mineral structure partially dissolves as a result of clay mineral-microbe interactions (Dong et al. 2003a; Furukawa and O’Reilly 2007; Jaisi et al. 2007b, 2008a; Kim et al. 2004; Li et al. 2004; O’Reilly et al. 2005, 2006; Zhang et al. 2007a, 2007b). Below we review the current status of research on microbe-clay mineral interactions and certain applications of reduced clay minerals in environmental remediation of contaminated groundwater and soils.


    MICROORGANISMS USED IN BIOREDUCTION STUDIES
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Microorganisms used in...
 Clay minerals used in...
 Rate and extent of...
 Relative reducibility of Fe(iii)...
 Mechanisms of microbial...
 Mineral transformations as a...
 Field demonstration of microbial...
 Application of reduced clay...
 Future perspectives
 Acknowledgments
 References cited
 
A wide variety of microorganisms from diverse environments have been used to reduce structural Fe(III) in clay minerals (Table 1Go). Among these are mesophilic Shewanella oneidensis from anoxic sediments of Lake Oneida, New York (Cervini-Silva et al. 2003; Dong et al. 2003a; Furukawa and O’Reilly 2007; Kostka et al. 1996, 1999a, 1999b, 2002; Lee et al. 2006; O’Reilly et al. 2005, 2006; Xu et al. 2001); Shewanella putrefaciens CN32 from a subsurface core sample (250 m beneath the surface) obtained from the Morrison Formation (Dong et al. 2003b; Jaisi 2007; Jaisi et al. 2005, 2007a, 2007b, 2007c, 2008a; Seabaugh et al. 2006; Zhang et al. 2007b); Geobacter metallireducens from freshwater sediments of the Potomac River, Maryland (Kostka et al. 1999b; Lovley et al. 1998); Pseudomonas spp. from wheat rhizosphere soils (Ernstsen et al. 1998; Gates et al. 1993, 1998; Kostka et al. 1999b), Bacillus spp. and certain enrichment cultures from source clay mineral SWa-1 and rice paddy soils in China (Gates et al. 1998; Kostka et al. 1999b, 2002; Stucki et al. 1987; Wu et al. 1988). Shelobolina et al. (2003) described a new strain of Desulfitobacterium frappieri from subsurface smectite bedding of the Twiggs Clay Formation of Late Eocene Age, Georgia, that is capable of reducing structural Fe(III) in ferruginous smectite (SWa-1). Li et al. (2004) was the first to study microbial reduction of Fe(III) in nontronite by a sulfate-reducing bacterium (Desulfovibrio spp. strain G-11 isolated from an enrichment of rumen fluid). A thermophilic bacterium from the Chinese Continental Scientific Drilling Project has been shown to have the ability to reduce ferric iron in clay minerals (Zhang et al. 2007a; Zhang 2006). More recently, several thermophilic and hyperthermophilic microorganisms from hydrothermal springs of Yellowstone National Park and the Pacific and Indian Oceans including Geothermobacter ehrlichii, Geogemma pacifica, Ferroglobus pacificus, Georgemma barossii, Georgemma indica, Ferroglobus indicus, and undescribed archaeal strains have been shown to reduce structural Fe(III) in smectite SWa-1 (Kashefi et al. 2008). In summary, these studies have demonstrated that microorganisms capable of reducing structural Fe(III) in clay minerals are usually facultatively or obligately anaerobic and they widely occur in soils, sediments, sedimentary rocks, and hydrothermal environments.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1. Summary of studies on microbial reduction of structural Fe(III) in clay minerals
 
Pure cultures of Shewanella oneidensis and enrichment cultures of Fe(III)-reducing bacteria from rice paddy soils and subsurface sediments have been shown to be capable of conserving energy for growth with structural Fe(III) in smectite clay as the sole electron acceptor (Kostka et al. 2002). The growth rate and yield of Shewanella oneidensis on Fe(III) of smectite clay are comparable to those on poorly crystalline Fe(III) oxides (Kostka et al. 2002). Subsequent work (Jaisi et al. 2005; Li et al. 2004) showed that natural nontronite samples were capable of supporting cell growth in pH buffers even without added nutrients, possibly due to the presence of nutrients in natural nontronite clays. Given the high abundance of clay minerals in soils and sediments, clay mineral dependent microbial metabolism may be an important process in these natural environments.


    CLAY MINERALS USED IN BIOREDUCTION STUDIES
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Microorganisms used in...
 Clay minerals used in...
 Rate and extent of...
 Relative reducibility of Fe(iii)...
 Mechanisms of microbial...
 Mineral transformations as a...
 Field demonstration of microbial...
 Application of reduced clay...
 Future perspectives
 Acknowledgments
 References cited
 
Montmorillonite and iron-rich smectites are by far the most commonly used clay minerals in studies of microbial reduction of ferric iron in clay minerals (Table 1Go). Recent studies have expanded to illite and chlorite (Table 1Go), mixed-layer illite-smectite and rectorite (Dong et al. 2009a), palykorskite (Dong et al. 2009a), vermiculite (Komlos et al. 2007), natural soils and sediments (Favre et al. 2002, 2006; Komlos et al. 2007; Stucki et al. 2007), and loess materials (Bishop et al. submitted).

Among all of the minerals studied, expandable smectite (nontronite or montmorillonite) is the most reducible by bacteria with the fastest rate and the highest extent of biological reduction (1–90% reduction), whereas illite is the least reducible (1–25%) (Table 1Go). The amount and the crystal-chemical environment of structural Fe(III) as well as the layer charge of clay mineral structures are some important factors that control the extent of reduction (Jaisi et al. 2007b). Layer charge is related to layer expandability, which may affect the electron transfer process. In general, the more expandable nontronite structure (i.e., low layer charge) should allow easier access of electron donor and shuttling compounds to the Fe(III) centers in the structure, which may result in a higher extent and faster rate of Fe(III) reduction. Indeed, our previous study (Seabaugh et al. 2006) concluded that the different extent of bioreduction between Fithian and Muloorina illites was related to layer charge. The correlation between relative reducibility and layer expandability is further strengthened by our latest data that shows that the rate and extent of mixed-layer illite/smectite and rectorite (ordered R1 I-S) are between those for smectite and illite (Dong et al. 2009b).

Chlorite is another clay mineral that contains a significant amount of iron in the structure. It has a general formula of (Mg, Fe)3(Si, Al)4O10(OH)2(Mg, Fe)3(OH)6 and the structural iron can be ferric or ferrous. Apparently due to the non-expandable nature of the layers, the octahedral Fe(III) within the TOT layer of ripidolite (chlorite) CCA-2 (Brandt et al. 2003) is bio-reducible by Shewanella putreficiens CN32 to a limited extent (<10%) (Jaisi et al. 2007b). This reduction was significantly enhanced in the presence of an electron shuttling compound, AQDS, similar to the case of microbial reduction of illite (Dong et al. 2003b). These lines of evidence suggest that the octahedral Fe(III) in non-expandable structures of clay minerals (such as illite and chlorite) is bioreducible, but to a limited extent, and that this bioreduction is enhanced by the presence of electron shuttling compounds.


    RATE AND EXTENT OF MICROBIAL REDUCTION OF FE(III) IN CLAY MINERALS
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Microorganisms used in...
 Clay minerals used in...
 Rate and extent of...
 Relative reducibility of Fe(iii)...
 Mechanisms of microbial...
 Mineral transformations as a...
 Field demonstration of microbial...
 Application of reduced clay...
 Future perspectives
 Acknowledgments
 References cited
 
A literature survey (Table 1Go) reveals that the extent and rate of microbial reduction of Fe(III) in clay minerals vary depending on experimental conditions such as the type of microorganisms and clay minerals, microbe/clay mineral concentration ratio, ferric iron content and layer charge, clay particle size (surface area), interlayer composition of clay minerals, presence or absence of electron shuttle, solution chemistry (pH, aqueous chemical composition), and temperature. A close examination of published data reveals the following general observations: (1) different microorganisms and clay minerals have major impacts on the extent and rate of bioreduction (Table 1Go); (2) the extent of bioreduction increases with increasing total Fe content of the clay minerals (Ernstsen et al. 1998; Gates et al. 1998), but decreases with increasing levels of initial Fe(II) present prior to bioreduction (Ernstsen et al. 1998); (3) decreasing clay particle size and increasing surface area increases the extent and rate of bioreduction (Ernstsen et al. 1998; Jaisi et al. 2007a); (4) lower layer charge of clay minerals favors bioreduction (Dong et al. 2009b; Seabaugh et al. 2006); (5) increasing microbial/clay mineral ratio increases the rate and extent of bioreduction (Jaisi et al. 2007c; Kostka et al. 1999a); (6) electron shuttling components enhance the extent and rate of bioreduction (Table 1Go); (7) solution chemistry (such as pH, presence or absence of Al and K) influences the bioreduction kinetics (Zhang et al. 2007a); (8) presence of organic matter in the interlayer appears to decrease the extent and rate of bioreduction (Zhang et al. 2007b); and (9) temperature affects bioreduction in different ways (Kashefi et al. 2008; Zhang et al. 2007a).

Because of these limiting experimental conditions, the extent of bioreduction is often far from completion (i.e., 100%) (Dong et al. 2003a, 2003b; Gates et al. 1993, 1998; Jaisi et al. 2005; Kim et al. 2004; Kostka et al. 1996, 1999a, 1999b; Li et al. 2004; O’Reilly et al. 2006; Shelobolina et al. 2003; Stucki 2006). For a given system, the incomplete reduction of structural Fe(III) in iron-rich smectite/nontronite has been ascribed to multiple effects: (1) inhibition by cell- and clay mineral-sorbed Fe(II) that is released from the structure as a result of bioreduction; (2) inhibition due to accumulation of solid phase reduction products on reactive clay mineral surfaces; and (3) energetics of the system (Jaisi et al. 2007b). The inhibition effects have also been observed for iron oxides in batch experiments (Roden and Urrutia 1999, 2002; Roden and Wetzel 2002) and can be removed or minimized by: (1) dynamic flow and (2) addition of fresh cells or clay minerals (Jaisi et al. 2007b; Urrutia et al. 1998). Removal of ferrous iron, a product of microbial reduction of Fe(III) in iron oxides, can promote microbial reduction of crystalline iron oxide to completion (100% extent of reduction) (Roden and Urrutia 1999). However, in the case of microbial reduction of Fe(III) in nontronite, dynamic flow in reactors (O’Reilly et al. 2006) did not significantly increase the extent of bioreduction (7%) as compared with static batch systems (4%). Clearly more research is needed in this area to confirm these results.

The removal or minimization of the inhibition effects by addition of fresh cells is effective for both iron oxides (Urrutia et al. 1998) and iron-rich smectites/nontronite (Fig. 1Go) (Jaisi et al. 2007b). Whereas the addition of fresh cells introduces uncoated cell surfaces, it also changes the energetics of the system. Thus, the combined effects of increased energy in the system and clean surfaces from freshly added cells may have been responsible for the increased extent of bioreduction for both nontronite (Jaisi et al. 2007b) (Fig. 1Go) and iron oxides (Urrutia et al. 1998). It is conceivable that the extent of bioreduction may eventually reach 100%, if enough fresh cells are added in multiple batches.


Figure 1
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 1. Resumption of Fe(III) bioreduction activity as a result of addition of fresh cells to a 7 month old culture with NAu-2, where Fe(III) bioreduction had ceased. The re-inoculation experiment was performed at a clay concentration of 10 mg/mL [~42 mM Fe(III)] and the cell concentration of 2 x 106 (both with and without AQDS). The cell concentration given in the legend represents the initial concentration at the beginning of inoculation and that used in each subsequent re-inoculation. Therefore, in the experiment with initial concentration of 2 x 106 cells/mL, by the end of four re-inoculations, the total cell concentration in each tube is 1 x 107 cells/mL. The arrows indicate the time of addition of fresh cells. Lactate is the sole electron donor at a concentration of 20 mM. The data are from Jaisi et al. (2007b).

 
For modeling the rate of microbial reduction of Fe(III) in nontronite, a kinetic biogeochemical model has been developed that incorporates the first-order rate expression with respect to effective Fe(III) concentration, Fe(II) sorption to cell and clay mineral surfaces, and an empirical equation for maximum sorption capacity (Jaisi et al. 2007c). The kinetics of microbial reduction of Fe(III) in nontronite NAu-2 was successfully modeled with this approach at variable concentrations of clay mineral and bacterial cells by considering surface saturation, Fe(II) production, and its sorption to clay mineral and cell surfaces. With these rate relationships, the relative importance of various parameters that control microbial reduction of Fe(III) in clay minerals in natural environments may be systematically evaluated. The model can be tested by designing experiments where reactive surface concentration of Fe(III) and cell concentration are systematically varied. Reactive surface concentration of Fe(III) can be varied by pre-sorbing different amounts of Fe(II) onto the clay mineral surface and/or by changing the clay mineral particle size/surface area. Ultimately, it is the ratio of cell concentration to reactive surface concentration of Fe(III), i.e., the probability of encounter between Fe(III) centers and microbes, that determines the rate and extent of bioreduction.


    RELATIVE REDUCIBILITY OF FE(iii) OXIDES AND CLAY MINERALS
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Microorganisms used in...
 Clay minerals used in...
 Rate and extent of...
 Relative reducibility of Fe(iii)...
 Mechanisms of microbial...
 Mineral transformations as a...
 Field demonstration of microbial...
 Application of reduced clay...
 Future perspectives
 Acknowledgments
 References cited
 
In natural environments, clay minerals and iron oxides are often co-present and they exert different effects on physical and chemical properties of soils and sediments (Anastacio et al. 2008; Komlos et al. 2007, 2008; Mohanty et al. 2008; Stucki et al. 2007). Therefore, it is important to determine the relative reducibility of Fe(III)-bearing oxides and clay minerals by iron-reducing microorganisms. A previous study (Kostka et al. 1999b) examined microbial reduction of Fe(III) in amorphous Fe oxides, goethite, smectite, and magnetite, and found that the surface area normalized rate of smectite reduction approached those of amorphous and crystalline Fe oxides. This experiment was carried out in separate tubes, where each contained a pure mineral (either iron oxide or clay mineral). When the iron oxides and silicates are co-present, as often is the case in natural sediments and soils, it is important to consider the areal contact between the microbial cells and the mineral. For example, simultaneous bioreduction of Fe(III) in goethite and illite has been observed previously (Dong et al. 2003b) and it was ascribed to the greater surface areal contact between illite and Shewanella putrefaciens CN32 cells. In one study (Seabaugh et al. 2006), illite was even more reducible than goethite in absence of electron shuttles, apparently because of the same reason, the greater areal contact between illite and bacterial cells. However, in the presence of an electron shuttle AQDS, goethite was reduced to a greater extent because bacterial cells would have better access to more reducible goethite. The higher reducibility of illite than goethite was subsequently confirmed by another study (Komlos et al. 2007). The authors carried out a bioreduction study in a long-term flow-through column experiment using sediments from the uncontaminated background area of the Department of Energy’s Field Research Center (FRC) in Oak Ridge, Tennessee. Although the sediments contained both Fe(III)-oxides and Fe(III)-silicates, the majority of the Fe(III) that was bioreduced was structural silicate-Fe(III). It is likely that the same reason, i.e., the areal contact between microbial cells and the mineral, may have played an important role. More recent studies have revealed that, in natural sediments, both oxide (goethite) and phyllosilicate Fe(III) (e.g., smectite, illite) are quantitatively important electron acceptors for microbial reduction (Anastacio et al. 2008; Favre et al. 2002; Komlos et al. 2007, 2008; Mohanty et al. 2008; Stucki et al. 2007).


    MECHANISMS OF MICROBIAL REDUCTION OF CLAY MINERALS
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Microorganisms used in...
 Clay minerals used in...
 Rate and extent of...
 Relative reducibility of Fe(iii)...
 Mechanisms of microbial...
 Mineral transformations as a...
 Field demonstration of microbial...
 Application of reduced clay...
 Future perspectives
 Acknowledgments
 References cited
 
There are two proposed mechanisms for microbial reduction of Fe(III) in smectites: solid-state and dissolution-precipitation. Lee et al. (2006), based on infrared spectroscopy, observed that bacterial reduction of structural Fe(III) in ferruginous smectite SWa-1 and Upton montorillonite changes the clay structure, but these changes are small and fully reversible upon reoxidation of reduced smectites. Stucki (2009) performed Mössbauer analysis of reduced and reoxidized smectites and reached a similar conclusion. A more recent study (Kashefi et al. 2008) showed that microbial Fe(III) reduction by an archaeal strain 140 was accompanied by an increase in interlayer and octahedral charges and some incorporation of K and Mg into the smectite structure. These studies imply that bacterial Fe(III) reduction takes place largely in the solid state without any significant dissolution of the clay structure. This solid-state reduction is consistent with reversibility of cation exchange capacity of smectite suspensions in both laboratory (Gates et al. 1996) and field settings (Favre et al. 2002).

In contrast, other studies have presented evidence for microbial dissolution of nontronite (Dong et al. 2003a; Furukawa and O’Reilly 2007; Jaisi et al. 2007b; Kim et al. 2004; Li et al. 2004; O’Reilly et al. 2005, 2006; Zhang et al. 2007a, 2007b). A most recent study (Vorhies and Gaines 2009) presented mineral phase relationship and stable isotope data from Cambrian mudstones suggesting that a microbially driven clay mineral dissolution reaction releases a significant fraction of Si and Fe. These studies have largely used scanning and transmission electron microscopy (SEM and TEM), along with X-ray diffraction (XRD), to directly observe dissolution textures of smectites and the formation of biogenic products (Si, siderite, vivianite, and illite) (Fig. 2Go). Irreversible changes of cation exchange capacity and specific surface area upon reduction and re-oxidation of pure smectites (Kostka et al. 1999b; Shen and Stucki 1994) also imply a certain degree of dissolution. In addition, reductive dissolution of clay minerals as a result of microbial activities has been implied in laboratory and field studies of natural soils (Favre et al. 2002; Kirk et al. 2003). Many reasons for the apparent inconsistency in the mechanisms of microbial reduction of Fe(III) in smectites (dissolution vs. solid-state) are discussed below.


Figure 2
View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 2. Vivianite formation as a result of microbial reduction of Fe(III) in nontronite.

 
First, the mechanism of Fe(III) reduction may be mineral specific. The authors of the dissolution mechanism (Dong et al. 2003a; Furukawa and O’Reilly 2007; Jaisi et al. 2005, 2007b; Kim et al. 2004; Li et al. 2004; O’Reilly et al. 2005, 2006; Zhang et al. 2007a, 2007b) have used nontronite samples (NAu-1 and NAu-2), whereas the solid-state mechanism was proposed based on studies of smectite samples (Garfield nontronite and ferruginous SWa-1 smectite) (Kashefi et al. 2008; Lee et al. 2006; Stucki and Kostka 2006). Clearly, there are important differences in total Fe content, layer charge, and other physical/chemical properties between these two sets of samples, as reported by Gates et al. (2002). Nontronite NAu-2 contains a significant amount of tetrahedral Fe(III) (Gates et al. 2002), and microbial reduction of this Fe(III) has been shown to result in reductive dissolution (Jaisi et al. 2005). The effect of total Fe content and layer charge on the reduction mechanism can be further revealed by comparing smectite (high Fe content and low layer charge) and illite (low Fe content and high layer charge). Although there is some evidence that illite dissolution may have occurred as a result of bioreduction (Dong et al. 2003b), other studies have shown that the illite structure largely remains intact (Kukkadapu et al. 2006; Seabaugh et al. 2006).

Second, the mechanism of reduction may be dictated by the extent of Fe(III) reduction. If the extent of dissolution is small, electron microscopy may show dissolution products that may be undetectable by other methods (such as infrared). Even if there is dissolution of nontronite and formation of biogenic Si (a major dissolution product), it may be difficult to detect it by infrared spectroscopy because the Si-O vibration bands in biogenic Si and quartz may be similar to those in residual nontronite. Our most recent evidence suggests that when the extent of reduction in nontronite (NAu-2) reaches ~30%, the nontronite structure apparently becomes less stable or even becomes partly X-ray amorphous as evidenced by nearly complete extraction of Fe(II) from reduced nontronite by 0.5 N HCl, <100% retention of Fe(II) in the structure, and significant broadening of the 001 peak in the XRD pattern of reduced NAu-2 (Fig. 3Go) (Jaisi et al. 2008a). If the biological reduction continues beyond this extent, partial dissolution of the smectite/nontronite structure is to be expected. The breakdown of the structure would release Fe(II), which becomes available for partitioning into surface complexation sites, interlayer sites, and aqueous solution (Jaisi et al. 2008a). The extent of dissolution depends on the extent of reduction and reaches ~35% when the extent of reduction is at ~70% (Jaisi et al. 2008a). Clearly, this extent of dissolution is significant and may account for formation of biogenic precipitates (silica, illite, vivianite, and siderite) (Dong et al. 2003a).


Figure 3
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 3. XRD pattern showing the 00l peak for differentially reduced NAu-2: biologically mediated Fe(III) reduction by Shewanella putrefaciens CN32 (a) and chemical Fe(III) reduction by dithionite (b). The legend indicates the extent of Fe(III) reduction. The values given in the XRD spectra are d-spacings in Å. This figure is taken from Jaisi et al. (2008a).

 
Third, the mechanism may also be related to the type of medium, the presence or absence of organic matter, and the solution pH used for bioreduction experiments. Available data in the literature suggest that a growth medium (such as M1 for Shewanella species) promotes reductive dissolution (Dong et al. 2003a). The presence of organic matter favors smectite dissolution because it can either acidify pH or chelate Fe(III) (Kostka et al. 1999a). Increasing pH can enhance smectite dissolution rates (Bauer and Velde 1999; Claret et al. 2002). Thus, under alkaline conditions, structural Fe(III) may be released into aqueous solution followed by microbial reduction to Fe(II) or vice versa (i.e., reduction followed by dissolution) (Zhang et al. 2007a).

Fourth, the concentration and type of microorganisms may play an important role in determining the mechanism of bioreduction of Fe(III) in clay minerals. The majority of published work in support of the dissolution mechanism of Fe(III) reduction was performed using high cell concentrations of Shewanella spp. Under such conditions, many metabolic by-products may influence solution chemistry and possibly result in clay mineral dissolution.

The effects of different microorganisms on Fe(III) reduction mechanisms can be illustrated by comparing Geobacter vs. Shewanella species. The species of Geobacter cannot produce any electron-shuttling compounds (Nevin and Lovley 2002) and thus require a direct contact between the bacterium and the clay mineral in order for bioreduction to take place (Fig. 4Go). In such a case, the electron transfer pathway may be parallel to the (001) layers. Whereas electron transfer to the Fe(III) centers near the clay edge may be readily accomplished, it may be difficult to transfer electrons to the Fe(III) centers in the middle of the clay packet. Thus, the extent of bioreduction may be limited and the clay mineral may largely remain in solid state as a result of bioreduction. Indeed, the extent of reduction of structural Fe(III) in clay minerals by Geobacter sp. is generally lower that that achieved by other microbes (Table 1Go) (Shelobolina et al. 2003). This parallel-layer electron transfer would result in a fixed number of Fe2+-O-Fe3+ intervalence electron transitions regardless of the extent of bioreduction, thus displaying a constant intensity of this transition band in optical absorption spectra (Lear and Stucki 1987). The limited capacity of parallel-layer electron transfer can be alleviated by electron-shuttling compounds. Indeed, when humic substances or its analog, AQDS, are added along with the bacteria, the extent of bioreduction of smectite SWa-1 by Geobacter metallireducens is significantly enhanced (Lovley et al. 1998). One mechanism by which humics or AQDS stimulate reduction of structural Fe(III) in smectite is that microbially reduced humics might be able to access Fe(III) within the smectite structure that microorganisms cannot access.


Figure 4
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 4. A schematic diagram showing two possible pathways of electron transfer from bacteria to the Fe(III) centers in the clay mineral structure. For Geobacter metallireducens, which cannot produce any electron-shuttling compounds, direct contact is required and electron transfer is parallel to the (001) layer. For Shewanella putrefaciens, which does produce electron-shuttle compounds, direct contact is not required and electron transfer may be parallel and perpendicular to the (001) layer.

 
In contrast to Geobacter species, Shewanella species can produce electron-shuttling compounds themselves (Nevin and Lovley 2002), thus facilitating electron transport both parallel and perpendicular to the (001) layers (Fig. 4Go). In this case, the rate and extent of bioreduction should be much higher than the parallel-layer electron transfer only, with a probability of partially dissolving the clay mineral structure. Indeed, Shewanella species can reduce smectite to a much higher extent than Geobacter species (Kostka et al. 1999b; Shelobolina et al. 2003) (Table 1Go). The addition of electron shuttling compound, AQDS, significantly enhances the extent of reduction (Dong et al. 2003a; Jaisi et al. 2005), suggesting that bioreduction may still be limited by the availability of such shuttling compounds. If the electron transfer chain is both parallel and perpendicular to the basal plane of the smectite structure, these dual (or multiple) electron transfer pathways should result in an increasing number of Fe2+-O-Fe3+ intervalence electron transfer transitions with an increasing extent of bioreduction (Komadel et al. 2006). Therefore, optical spectrophotometry may be an attractive way to determine the electron transfer mechanisms by different bacteria (Komadel et al. 2006). This hypothesis remains to be tested by future studies.

In addition to the ability of producing electron-shuttling compounds, certain microbes can produce cell surface polymers that may play important roles in bioreduction. For example, Kashefi et al. (2008) observed that the highest amounts of iron in smectite SWa-1 were solubilized by bacterial and archaeal strains that produced copious extracellular polymeric substances (EPS). Acidic EPS materials have been shown to bind cations such as Fe3+ and other trace metals (Decho 1990; Nichols et al. 2005; Sutherland 2001). Thus, EPS may be functionally similar to certain chelators in dissolving the clay mineral structure (Kostka et al. 1999a).

In summary, one or several of these factors may be important in determining the dissolution vs. solid-state bioreduction mechanism. We acknowledge that these two mechanisms represent two extreme cases and that reality might lie somewhere between these mechanisms. For example, Anastacio et al. (2008) observed that the final structure of the reduced-reoxidized smectite contained more defects than the original clay, suggesting some change to the structure as a result of reduction-reoxidation cycle. Likewise, Kukkadapu et al. (2006) observed that biogenic Fe(II) largely remained in the illite structure, but the illite became more soluble in weak acid than the original mineral, suggesting some change to the illite structure.


    MINERAL TRANSFORMATIONS AS A RESULT OF MICROBIAL REDUCTION OF CLAY MINERALS
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Microorganisms used in...
 Clay minerals used in...
 Rate and extent of...
 Relative reducibility of Fe(iii)...
 Mechanisms of microbial...
 Mineral transformations as a...
 Field demonstration of microbial...
 Application of reduced clay...
 Future perspectives
 Acknowledgments
 References cited
 
Iron-rich clay minerals are often the products of physical, chemical, and biological weathering of primary silicates and their presence often indicates an aqueous environment on Earth and on extraterrestrial planets such as Mars (Bishop et al. 2008; Poulet et al. 2005). Microorganisms have been shown to greatly facilitate weathering of silicate minerals (Banfield et al. 1999; Barker et al. 1997; Welch and Banfield 2002; Welch et al. 1999, 2002) and volcanic ash (Kawano and Tomita 2001, 2002), especially when these minerals contain phosphorous (Bennett et al. 2001; Rogers and Bennett 2004), an essential element to all life forms but often limiting in natural environment. One specific clay mineral, smectite, often forms by the alteration of primary silicates and volcanic ash during microbial weathering (Banfield et al. 1999; Barker and Banfield 1996; Kawano and Tomita 2001, 2002) or via accumulation of certain ions from water and extracellular polymeric substances as a template for layer-silicate synthesis (Konhauser et al. 2002; Tazaki 2006).

Under the circumstances of clay mineral dissolution as a result of microbial reduction of structural Fe(III), several new or altered minerals can possibly form, including biogenic silica (Dong et al. 2003a; Furukawa and O’Reilly 2007; Li et al. 2004; O’Reilly et al. 2005; Zhang et al. 2007a), smectite (Dong et al. 2003a; Zhang et al. 2007a), illite (Kim et al. 2004; Zhang et al. 2007b), vivianite (Dong et al. 2003a), siderite (Kim et al. 2004; O’Reilly et al. 2005; Zhang et al. 2007b), Fe-sulfides [when sulfate-reducing bacteria are used to reduce Fe(III) in nontronite] (Li et al. 2004), calcite (Li et al. 2004), and various forms of amorphous materials (Dong et al. 2003a; O’Reilly et al. 2005). Although these minerals can also form inorganically, biogenic minerals are often smaller and more uniform in particle size (O’Reilly et al. 2005; Zhang et al. 2007a) and have fewer compositional impurities than chemically formed counterparts (Carvallo et al. 2008). These differences in size and chemistry may be responsible for differences in their properties. For example, studies have shown that Fe-oxide and As-sulfides synthesized abiotically and biotically show different electrical and photoconductive properties (Lee et al. 2007) and rates of heterogeneous catalytic efficiency (Jung et al. 2007), but equivalent research has not been conducted for biogenic clay minerals.

In addition to these unique functional properties, biogenic minerals may have high solubility and reactivity, owing to their small size and large surface area. If present in large quantities, these highly soluble and reactive nanoparticles would play important roles in biogeochemical cycling of life-essential elements in natural environments. For example, it is well known that plant uptake of silica plays a major role in the terrestrial silica cycle (Raven 2003), but the total global rate of silica release from weathering of silicate minerals is only a small fraction of the uptake by plants (Berner and Berner 1996; Kump et al. 2000). This disparity between the rates of supply of new silica and its potential uptake by plants should lead silica to behave like other rock-derived nutrient elements such as potassium (K) and phosphorus (P) that are strongly recycled between biomass and the upper soil and litter layers. Although many previous studies have indicated that high concentrations of silica can occur in specific and rather unique environments, such as geothermal springs, hydrothermal vents, and volcanic ash deposits (Konhauser 2006), this reservoir of silica is generally not available to plants and other life forms. Thus, release of silica from microbial reduction of Fe(III) in clay minerals (Fig. 5Go) may potentially play an important role in the geochemical cycle of silica in soils and sediments. Indeed, a recent study (Vorhies and Gaines 2009) demonstrated microbial liberation of silica and iron from solid clay minerals in shallow marine sediments. This release is important in providing marine organisms with important nutrients.


Figure 5
View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 5. Secondary electron images showing nano-sized and aggregated biogenic silica in bioreduced NAu-2 after 23 and 120 days of incubation by a thermophilic bacterium Thermoanaerobacter ethanolicus. The left subfigure shows nano-sized silica after 23 days of incubation; the top right sub-figure shows nano-sized silica associated with biofilm after 23 days of incubation, and the low right subfigure shows aggregated biogenic silica after 120 days of incubation (after Zhang et al. 2007a).

 
In the context of microbially catalyzed clay mineral reaction, the smectite to illite conversion is of a special note in geochemistry. The smectite to illite (S-I) reaction is considered to be one of the most important mineral reactions during sediment diagenesis of mudstones and shales (Peacor 1992), as the degree of the smectite to illite reaction, termed "smectite illitization," is linked to maturation, migration, and trapping of hydrocarbons (Burst 1969; Pevear 1999; Weaver 1960), development of pore pressures (Freed and Peacor 1989), growth faults (Bruce 1984), rock cementation and porosity reduction (Bjorkum and Nadeau 1998; Boles and Franks 1979), and pore water chemistry (Brown et al. 2001). The smectite to illite reaction proceeds through mixed-layer illite-smectite (I-S) intermediates in which the percentage of illite layers increases with increasing temperature (Hower et al. 1976), time (Pytte and Reynolds 1989), K concentration (Huang et al. 1993), water/rock ratio (Whitney 1990), and pH (Drief et al. 2002; Eberl et al. 1993). Recent studies have shown a significant effect of microbes in promoting the smectite to illite reaction (Kim et al. 2004) (Fig. 6Go). The microbially promoted smectiteillite reaction can take place at room temperature and one atmosphere within two weeks (Kim et al. 2004). This reaction typically requires conditions of 300–350 °C, 100 MPa, and 4–5 months in the absence of microbial activity. Our recent studies (Zhang et al. 2007b) have demonstrated a strong catalytic effect on the smectite to illite reaction of organic matter intercalated in the interlayer of the smectite structure. Even at diagenetically relevant temperatures, the smectite to illite reaction can be catalyzed by thermophilic bacteria (Zhang et al. 2007a).


Figure 6
View larger version (73K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 6. TEM image showing the microbially catalyzed smectite to illite reaction. This figure is taken from Kim et al. (2004). Two phases of clay minerals were observed: an approximately 40 nm thick packet of 1.0 nm illite layers occurred in the smectite matrix of 1.3 nm layers. The inset of selected area electron diffraction (SAED) patterns show the structural difference between these two phases in (hk0) reflections, in ring patterns (turbostratic typical of the smectite structure) and in discrete Bragg reflections (typical of the illite structure).

 
Such a microbially induced smectite to illite reaction has been either implicated indirectly or demonstrated directly. For example, microbial activity may be responsible for the substantial S-I reaction seen in some modern mudstones, such as those from the Nankai Trough, Japan (Masuda et al. 2001). These young sediments have a significant percentage of illite (indicating a large extent of S-I reaction) and sulfate-reducing microbes (Reed et al. 2002). Joeckel and Clement (2005) studied mineralogy and microbial communities in saline-sodic wetlands of the North Platte River Valley in western Nebraska, and found that water-holding basins in the wetlands contain smectite and illite. Illite dominates basin surface soils, but smectite dominates at depth. High soil pH, available K, and frequent wetting-drying in the wetlands suggest that in-situ illitization may have occurred, possibly enhanced by sulfate-reducing bacterial activity. Importantly, the activity of sulfate-reducing bacteria is also highest at the basin surface soil, coinciding with the high content of illite (Joeckel and Clement 2005). Although there is a possibility that there may be a major change in the provenance and mineralogy of sediments deposited in the area during the Quaternary (i.e., smectite-rich sediments during the time when the bottom sediments of the basins were deposited and illite-rich sediments deposited near the top), there is certainly a possibility that in situ smectite illitization may have occurred, likely enhanced by the activity of sulfate-reducing bacteria.

Another study (Huggett and Cuadros 2005) investigated low-temperature illitization of smectite in the late Eocene and early Oligocene of the Isle of Wight (Hampshire basin), U.K. The authors conclude that the smectite to illite transition occurs through Fe reduction in octahedral sites leading to increased layer charge coupled with K fixation. The driving mechanism for the irreversible Fe(III) reduction in the smectite structure is wetting (reducing) and drying (oxidizing) cycles in gley soil, in which reoxidation of reduced Fe is never complete. A more recent study similarly demonstrates a smectite to illite reaction in a field setting that is promoted by wetting-drying cycles (Stanjek and Marchel 2008). In these studies, although the role of bacteria in the smectite to illite reaction was not specifically investigated, it certainly remains a strong possibility.

A recent study (Vorhies and Gaines 2009) investigated mineral textural relationships in carbonate concretions found within illite-bearing shales of the Middle Cambrian Wheeler Formation of the House Range, Utah. Textural, mineralogical, and oxygen isotope evidence all support microbial reduction of structural Fe(III) and dissolution of clay minerals. As a result of microbial dissolution, silica and iron are released into pore water, and under favorable conditions, biogenic minerals such as authigenic quartz, calcite, pyrite, and illite are formed. These results provide a field example where microbial reduction and dissolution of clay minerals can lead to neoformation of illite.

Recognition of biogenic minerals in the rock record is important as they can be used as bio-signatures to infer past biological processes. Unfortunately, this is a difficult process, as many characteristics of biogenic minerals may be the same as or similar to those of chemically formed counterparts. Although laboratory-synthesized Fe-oxide (Jung et al. 2007) and arsenic sulfide (Lee et al. 2007) minerals have shown some important differences between biogenic and abiogenic minerals, apparently because of unique biological processes involved, these differences may be difficult to extrapolate to naturally formed minerals. Clearly this represents an important area of future research.


    FIELD DEMONSTRATION OF MICROBIAL REDUCTION OF FE(III) IN CLAY MINERALS
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Microorganisms used in...
 Clay minerals used in...
 Rate and extent of...
 Relative reducibility of Fe(iii)...
 Mechanisms of microbial...
 Mineral transformations as a...
 Field demonstration of microbial...
 Application of reduced clay...
 Future perspectives
 Acknowledgments
 References cited
 
While microbial reduction of Fe(III) in clay minerals has been studied in laboratory for over 20 years (Stucki et al. 1987), only recently has it been demonstrated in natural environments (Favre et al. 2002). Favre et al. (2002) reported an increase in Fe(II) content in rice-cropped vertisols in Senegal, with a consequent large increase in cation exchange capacity (CEC). The increased CEC was attributed to both dissolution of Fe-oxide coatings and reduction of Fe(III) in the smectite structure. Similar conclusions were reached in laboratory-based studies of impacts of flooding and redox conditions on the properties of bulk soils (Kirk et al. 2003) and clay fractions (Favre et al. 2006). In another study (Shelobolina et al. 2004), Fe(III) in poorly crystalline Fe(III) oxides and phyllosilicates has been shown to represent important electron acceptors for indigenous iron-reducing microorganisms in a petroleum-contaminated aquifer, near Bemidji, Minnesota.

More recent studies of microbial reduction of Fe(III) in clay minerals and iron oxides have been conducted in the context of bioremediation (Anastacio et al. 2008; Komlos et al. 2007, 2008; Mohanty et al. 2008; Stucki et al. 2007). These studies are conclusive in demonstrating that Fe(III) in both iron oxides and silicate clay minerals is reducible by microorganisms under in situ field conditions. For example, in a saprolitic soil from the U.S. Department of Energy Field Research Center near Oak Ridge, Tennessee, electron donors (glucose and ethanol) were injected to biologically stimulate iron-reducing bacterial activity and thus to promote heavy metal immobilization (U, Tc, and Cr) (Stucki et al. 2007). As a result of such in situ biostimulation, major changes in iron mineralogy were observed, including significant decreases in iron oxide content and increases in clay mineral Fe(II) content.

In contrast to recent interests in iron redox chemistry in soils and terrestrial sediments, there have been many earlier studies of iron redox chemistry in marine sediments. Lyle (1983) was one of the first to study down-core concentrations of dissolved nitrate, Mn, and Fe in pore waters within the color transition zones of marine sediments, and based on laboratory-demonstrated reversibility of color changes, the author hypothesized that the color change was caused by in situ reduction of Fe(III) in smectites in the sediments. Based on Mössbauer spectroscopy studies, Konig et al. (1997) quantified the fraction of the bulk sediment iron that experiences reduction through a typical tan-green color transition in marine sediments, and reached a similar conclusion that the tan-green color transition in pelagic sediments is due to in situ transition of Fe(III) to Fe(II) in smectites. Similarly, based on detailed Mössbauer spectroscopy studies, Drodt and colleagues (Drodt et al. 1997, 1998) observed that a significant part of the clay mineral iron is redox sensitive, and the authors proposed that the color change of the sediments at the redox boundary from tan to green in a marine sediment core of the Peru Basin coincides with a change in the relative Fe(II) content in layer silicates from 11 to 37%. In these studies, the authors speculated that Fe(III) reduction to Fe(II) is a chemical process, although it is equally likely that this reduction may be microbially catalyzed (Vorhies and Gaines 2009). Upon contact with atmospheric oxygen and other oxidants such as nitrate in pore water, this latent fraction of reactive Fe(II) can be readily oxidized and may represent the major barrier to the movement of oxidation fronts in pelagic subsurface sediments (Konig et al. 1999).

In summary, many studies have observed microbial reduction of Fe(III) in clay minerals (smectite, illite/vermiculite) in natural soils and sediments, but because clay minerals are intimately associated with iron oxides with complex textural relationships, it is often not straightforward to separately determine their respective effects on physical and chemical properties of soils and sediments. This represents an area of future research, possibly using more visual-based imaging techniques at high spatial resolutions.


    APPLICATION OF REDUCED CLAY MINERALS TO REMEDIATION OF HEAVY METALS AND ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Microorganisms used in...
 Clay minerals used in...
 Rate and extent of...
 Relative reducibility of Fe(iii)...
 Mechanisms of microbial...
 Mineral transformations as a...
 Field demonstration of microbial...
 Application of reduced clay...
 Future perspectives
 Acknowledgments
 References cited
 
Redox reactions between chemically reduced smectite and heavy metal Cr(VI) were recognized more than a decade ago (Gan et al. 1996). Subsequently, reactivity of Fe(II) in other reduced clay minerals including illite and vermiculite was determined (Taylor et al. 2000). Sorption of Cr(VI) to clay surface is a prerequisite for the subsequent reduction (Taylor et al. 2000). The extent of Cr(VI) reduction is greater when the interlayer cation is Na, but lower if it is K. Now Cr(VI) reduction by structural Fe(II) has been recognized for many layer silicates including naturally present chlorite, corrensite, and biotite (Brigatti et al. 2000; Chon et al. 2006). A more recent study (Parthasarathy et al. 2007) reported that an iron-rich saponite, a trioctahedral equivalent of nontronite, was capable of reducing Cr(VI) to Cr(III) with a 75% efficiency. All these studies have effectively shown that structural Fe(II) in phyllosilicates is capable of adsorbing hexavalent chromium and reducing Cr(VI) to Cr(III).

In parallel to the studies on the interaction between phyllosilicates and chromium, investigations of clay minerals with other heavy metals, such as U and Tc, were also undertaken. Cui and Eriksen (1996) studied reduction of pertechnetate in solution by heterogeneous electron transfer from Fe(II)-containing geological materials and concluded that Fe(II)-containing chlorite was reactive toward Tc(VII) reduction, although its reduction efficiency was not as high as magnetite. Similarly, biogenic Fe(II) produced from sediment materials that contained abundant iron oxides has been shown to be highly reactive toward Tc(VII) reduction to insoluble TcO2·nH2O (Fredrickson et al. 2004), whereas that from sediments that contained plentiful layer silicates (illite, vermiculite, smectite) was the least reactive.

Jaisi et al. (2008a) investigated the reactivity of Fe(II) in a reduced pure clay mineral, nontronite NAu-2, toward Tc(VII) reduction (Fig. 7Go). The authors concluded that when the extent of Fe(III) reduction is higher than ~30%, a certain amount of Fe(II) is released from the structure and partitioned into four species: aqueous Fe2+, surface complexation Fe(II), ion exchangeable Fe(II), and structural Fe(II). The released Fe(II) has the highest affinity for the surface complexation site, but this site has limited capacity (141 meq/kg NAu-2). The ion exchangeable site has much higher capacity (697 meq/kg). Experiments performed to understand the reactivity of these various Fe(II) species showed that the structural Fe(II) and surface-complexed Fe(II) exhibited greater reactivity toward Tc(VII) reduction than the ion-exchangeable Fe(II). The authors concluded that the surface-complexed and structural Fe(II) are the desirable species if the rate of Tc(VII) is to be maximized.


Figure 7
View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 7. (a) Tc(VII) reduction as a function of Fe(II) concentration in nontronite (NAu-2) that was initially reduced to different extents by dithionite; (b) normalized Tc(VII) reduction [relative to NAu-2 mass and Fe(II) concentration] with time. The legend gives the percent of reduction and NAu-2 concentration (0.8–1 mg/mL). The data were taken from Jaisi et al. (2008a).

 
Whereas the Jaisi et al. (2008a) study examined the reaction of Fe(II) in pure nontronite with Tc(VII), Peretyazhko et al. (2008) studied heterogeneous reduction of Tc(VII) by structural Fe(II) in illite and vermiculite dominant phyllosilicates in a weathered shale-limestone saprolite (FRC) from the Field Research Center of the U.S. Department of Energy Environmental Remediation Sciences Division (ERSD) program. The FRC sediment was treated with dithionite-citrate-bicarbonate (DCB) to remove all Fe(III) and Mn(III/IV) oxides and to reduce Fe(III) in illite/vermiculite to Fe(II). The DCB-treated FRC sediment was reacted with Tc(VII) and was found to be reactive toward Tc(VII) reduction to Tc(IV). The reactivity was ascribed to the Fe(II) at the edge-complexation sites and in the structure of the smallest particles of illite/vermiculite that were extractable with a 0.5 N HCl treatment. The ion exchangeable Fe(II) was not active as the addition of Fe(II) to DCB, 0.5 N HCl treated FRC sediments showed no additional reactivity toward Tc(VII) reduction.

More recently, Jaisi et al. (2009) investigated the kinetics of Tc(VII) reduction by Fe(II) in pure clay mineral nontronite and observed that the rate of Tc(VII) reduction was highest at neutral pH when Fe(II) concentration was low (<1 mmol/g). The effect of pH, however, was insignificant when Fe(II) concentration was high (>1 mmol/g). The reduction of Tc(VII) by Fe(II) in biologically reduced nontronite was also studied in the presence of common subsurface oxidants including iron and manganese oxides, nitrate, and oxygen, to evaluate the effect of these oxidants on enhancement or inhibition of Tc(VII) reduction or reoxidation of Tc(IV). Goethite and hematite enhanced reduction of Tc(VII), apparently as a result of re-distribution of reactive Fe(II) from nontronite to goethite/hematite surfaces. Addition of manganese oxides inhibited Tc(VII) reduction, and K+-birnessite reoxidized previously reduced Tc(IV). Nitrate neither enhanced reduction of Tc(VII) nor promoted reoxidation of Tc(IV), whereas oxygen was capable of reoxidizing Tc(IV). When the same oxidants were added to aged Tc reduction products (mainly remaining NAu-2 and TcO2·nH2O), the extent of Tc(IV) reoxidation decreased significantly relative to fresh Tc(IV) products. Increasing NAu-2 concentration also resulted in decreased extent of Tc(IV) reoxidation. The results suggest that NAu-2 aggregation effectively retained Tc(IV) in the NAu-2 matrix and decreased its vulnerability to reoxidation.

In addition to their reactivity toward inorganic heavy metal immobilization, smectites that were either biologically or chemically reduced have also been used to degrade organic contaminants including pesticides, chlorinated aliphatics, and nitroaromatics (Hofstetter et al. 2003, 2006; Neumann et al. 2008; Stucki 2006). Stucki (2006) recently reviewed this subject and we will not repeat it here. It is important for readers to recognize that the degradation reactions between redox-active clay minerals and organic compounds only constitute a small subset of a much broader clay mineral-organic matter interactions as recently reviewed by Lagaly et al. (2006).


    FUTURE PERSPECTIVES
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Microorganisms used in...
 Clay minerals used in...
 Rate and extent of...
 Relative reducibility of Fe(iii)...
 Mechanisms of microbial...
 Mineral transformations as a...
 Field demonstration of microbial...
 Application of reduced clay...
 Future perspectives
 Acknowledgments
 References cited
 
Clearly the research area of microbe-clay mineral interactions has increasingly received more attention in the past few years. This is not surprising considering that clay minerals and microorganisms are both low-temperature entities, and they co-exist and interact in a wide variety of natural environments. Past studies have focused on redox reactions of clay minerals involving metal-reducing microorganisms (Stucki 2006) and biogenic formation of clay minerals such as halloysite and smectite (Tazaki 2006). However, clay mineral-microbe interactions should be multifaceted with broad implications for several environmental processes. Examples of such interactions include pH-promoted clay dissolution and precipitation, siderophore and other organic ligand facilitated clay reactions, and clay mineral nucleation and precipitation as facilitated by bacteria surfaces.

Future studies should be focused on quantifications of the extents and rates of clay mineral-microbe interactions, especially in natural systems. For example, what are the overall impacts of such interactions on soil fertility and contamination migration and fate in the field? How does chemistry of water bodies (surface water, groundwater, and seawater) change in response to such interactions? What is the relative importance of iron oxides vs. iron-rich clay minerals in sustaining microbial ecosystems in surface and subsurface systems? How are the clay mineral-microbe interactions linked to the global cycles of carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorous? All of these questions require an integrated approach, combining clay mineralogy and crystal chemistry, molecular microbiology and microbial ecology, aqueous geochemistry, contaminant hydrology, and quantitative modeling. In addressing these questions, advanced techniques are likely to play increasingly important roles. In situ microscopy, spectroscopy, and synchrotron-based X-ray techniques may provide key information necessary to understand clay mineral-microbe interactions.

To answer these questions, it is important that we establish interdisciplinary research teams, where clay mineralogists, geochemists, microbiologists, hydrologists, and mathematical modelers, all work together to share their expertise and train the next generations of scientists by offering workshops, short courses, and other training opportunities. We hope that this review paper promotes future collaborations among people with diverse backgrounds and inspires young students to become interested in this subject area.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Microorganisms used in...
 Clay minerals used in...
 Rate and extent of...
 Relative reducibility of Fe(iii)...
 Mechanisms of microbial...
 Mineral transformations as a...
 Field demonstration of microbial...
 Application of reduced clay...
 Future perspectives
 Acknowledgments
 References cited
 
This work was supported by grants from the U.S. Department of Energy (DE-FG02-07ER64369), NSF of China (40672079), the 111 projects of China (nos. B07011 and B08030), 973 Project of China (2006CB701406), and the Research Funds of the State Key Laboratory of Geological Processes and Mineral Resources of China University of Geosciences-Beijing (GPMR2008K08B and GPMR200844). The authors are grateful to Evgenya Shelobolina and an anonymous reviewer for their constructive comments that greatly improved the quality of this manuscript.


    Footnotes
 
MANUSCRIPT HANDLED BY WARREN HUFF

MANUSCRIPT RECEIVED March 18, 2009; MANUSCRIPT ACCEPTED July 17, 2009


    REFERENCES CITED
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Microorganisms used in...
 Clay minerals used in...
 Rate and extent of...
 Relative reducibility of Fe(iii)...
 Mechanisms of microbial...
 Mineral transformations as a...
 Field demonstration of microbial...
 Application of reduced clay...
 Future perspectives
 Acknowledgments
 References cited
 

Anastacio, A.S., Aouad, A., Sellin, P., Fabris, J.D., Bergaya, F., and Stucki, J.W. (2008) Characterization of a redox-modified clay mineral with respect to its suitability as a barrier in radioactive waste confinement. Applied Clay Science, 39, 172–179.[CrossRef][Web of Science][GeoRef]

Banfield, J.F., Barker, W.W., Welch, S.A., and Taunton, A. (1999) Biological impact on mineral dissolution: Application of the lichen model to understanding mineral weathering in the rhizosphere. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U.S.A., 96, 3404–3411.[Abstract/Free Full Text][CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline][GeoRef]

Barker, W.W. and Banfield, J.F. (1996) Biologically vs. inorganically mediated weathering reactions: Relationship between minerals and extracellular microbial polymers in lithobiontic communities. Chemical Geology, 132, 55–69.[CrossRef][Web of Science][GeoRef]

Barker, W.W., Barker, S.A., and Banfield, J.F. (1997) Biogeochemical weathering of silicate minerals. In J.F. Banfield and K.M. Nealson, Eds., Geomicrobiology: Interactions Between Microbes and Minerals, 35, p. 391–428. Reviews in Mineralogy, Mineralogical Society of America, Chantilly, Virginia.

Bauer, A. and Velde, B. (1999) Smectite transformation in high molar KOH solutions. Clay Minerals, 34, 259–273.[Abstract][CrossRef][Web of Science][GeoRef]

Bennett, P.C., Rogers, J.R., and Choi, W.J. (2001) Silicates, silicate weathering, and microbial ecology. Geomicrobiology Journal, 18, 3–19.[CrossRef][Web of Science][GeoRef]

Berner, E.K. and Berner, R.A. (1996) Global Environment: Water, Air, and Geochemical Cycles, 376 p. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.

Bishop, J.L., Dobrea, E.Z.N., McKeown, N.K., Parente, M., Ehlmann, B.L., Michalski, J.R., Milliken, R.E., Poulet, F., Swayze, G.A., Mustard, J.F., Murchie, S.L., and Bibring, J.P. (2008) Phyllosilicate diversity and past aqueous activity revealed at Mawrth Vallis, Mars. Science, 321, 830–833.[Abstract/Free Full Text][CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline][GeoRef]

Bjorkum, P.A. and Nadeau, P.H. (1998) Temperature controlled porosity/permeability reduction, fluid migration, and petroleum exploration in sedimentary basins. APPEA Journal, 38, 453–464.[GeoRef]

Boles, J.R. and Franks, S.G. (1979) Clay diagenesis in Wilcox sandstones of southwest Texas—implications of smectite diagenesis on sandstone cementation. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 49, 55–70.[Abstract/Free Full Text][GeoRef]

Brandt, F., Bosbach, D., Krawczyk-Barsch, E., Arnold, T., and Bernhard, G. (2003) Chlorite dissolution in the acid pH-range: A combined microscopic and macroscopic approach. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 67, 1451–1461.[CrossRef][Web of Science][GeoRef]

Brigatti, M.F., Lugli, C., Cibin, G., Marcelli, A.G.G., Paris, E., Mottana, A., and Wu, Z. (2000) Reduction and sorption of chromium by Fe(II)-bearing phyllosilicates: Chemical treatments and X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) studies. Clays and Clay Minerals, 48, 272–281.[Abstract/Free Full Text][CrossRef][Web of Science][GeoRef]

Brown, K.M., Saffer, D.M., and Bekins, B.A. (2001) Smectite diagenesis, pore-water freshening, and fluid flow at the toe of the Nankai wedge. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 194, 97–109.[CrossRef][Web of Science][GeoRef]

Bruce, C.H. (1984) Smectite dehydration: Its relation to structural development and hydrocarbon accumulation in northern Gulf of Mexico basin. American Association of Petroleum Geologist Bulletin, 68, 673–683.[Abstract][GeoRef]

Burst, J.F. (1969) Diagenesis of Gulf Coast clayey sediments and its possible relation to petroleum migration. American Association of Petroleum Geologist Bulletin, 53, 73–93.[Abstract][GeoRef]

Carvallo, C., Sainctavit, P., Arrio, M.A., Menguy, N., Wang, Y.H., Ona-Nguema, G., and Brice-Profeta, S. (2008) Biogenic vs. abiogenic magnetite nanoparticles: A XMCD study. American Mineralogist, 93, 880–885.[Abstract/Free Full Text][CrossRef][Web of Science][GeoRef]

Cervini-Silva, J., Kostka, J.E., Larson, R.A., Stucki, J.W., and Wu, J. (2003) Dehydrochlorination of 1,1,1-trichloroethane and pentachloroethane by microbially reduced ferruginous smectite. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 22, 1046–1050.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Chon, C.M., Kim, J.G., and Moon, H.S. (2006) Kinetics of chromate reduction by pyrite and biotite under acidic conditions. Applied Geochemistry, 21, 1469–1481.[CrossRef][Web of Science][GeoRef]

Claret, F., Bauer, A., Schafer, T., Griffault, L., and Lason, B. (2002) Experimental investigation of the interaction of clays with high-pH solutions: a case study from the callovo-oxfordian formation, meuse-haute marne underground laboratory (France). Clays and Clay Minerals, 50, 633–646.[Abstract/Free Full Text][CrossRef][Web of Science][GeoRef]

Cui, D.Q. and Eriksen, T.E. (1996) Reduction of pertechnetate in solution by heterogeneous electron transfer from Fe(II)-containing geological material. Environmental Science and Technology, 30, 2263–2269.[GeoRef]

Decho, A.W. (1990) Microbial exopolymer secretions in ocean environments: Their role(s) in food webs and marine processes. In M. Barnes, Ed., Oceanography Marine Biology Annual Review, p. 73–153. Aberdeen University Press, U.K.

Dong, H. (2005) Interstratified illite-smectite: a review of contributions of TEM data to crystal chemical relations and reaction mechanisms. Clay Science, 12 (Supplement 1), 6–12.

Dong, H., Kostka, J.E., and Kim, J.W. (2003a) Microscopic evidence for microbial dissolution of smectite. Clays and Clay Minerals, 51, 502–512.[Abstract/Free Full Text][CrossRef][Web of Science][GeoRef]

Dong, H., Kukkadapu, R.K., Fredrickson, J.K., Zachara, J.M., Kennedy, D.W., and Kostandarithes, H.M. (2003b) Microbial reduction of structural Fe(III) in illite and goethite by a groundwater bacterium. Environmental Science and Technology, 37, 1268–1276.

Dong, H., Jaisi, D.P., Zhang, G., and Kim, J.W. (2009a) Microbe-clay mineral interactions and implications for environmental remediation. The 237th Annual Meeting of American Chemical Society, Salk Lake City, Abstract Geoc. 68.

Dong, H., Ji, S., Yang, J., Bishop, M.E., and Zhang, J. (2009b) Microbial reduction of iron in smectite (nontronite), mixed-layer smectite/illite, and illite: Correlating the rate and extent of bioreduction with layer charge and expandability. 46th Clay Minerals Society Annual Meeting, Billings, Montana, p. 113.

Drief, A., Martinez-Ruiz, F., Nieto, F., and Sanchez, N.V. (2002) Transmission electron microscopy evidence for experimental illization of smectite in K-enriched seawater solution at 50 °C and basic pH. Clays and Clay Minerals, 50, 746–756.[Abstract/Free Full Text][CrossRef][Web of Science][GeoRef]

Drodt, M., Trautwein, A.X., Konig, I., Suess, E., and Koch, C.B. (1997) Mössbauer spectroscopic studies on the iron forms of deep-sea sediments. Physics and Chemistry of Minerals, 24, 281–293.[CrossRef][Web of Science][GeoRef]

Drodt, M., Lougear, A., Trautwein, A.X., Konig, I., Suess, E., and Koch, C.B. (1998) Studies of iron in deep-sea sediments by Mössbauer spectroscopy. Hyperfine Interactions, 117, 383–403.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Eberl, D.D., Velde, B., and McCormick, T. (1993) Synthesis of illite-smectite from smectite at Earth surface temperatures and high pH. Clay Minerals, 28, 49–60.[Abstract][Web of Science][GeoRef]

Ernstsen, V., Gates, W.P., and Stucki, J.W. (1998) Microbial reduction of structural iron in clays—A renewable source of reduction capacity. Journal of Environmental Quality, 27, 761–766.[Abstract/Free Full Text][Web of Science]

Favre, F., Tessier, D., Abdelmoula, M., Genin, J.M., Gates, W.P., and Boivin, P. (2002) Iron reduction and changes in cation exchange capacity in intermittently waterlogged soil. European Journal of Soil Science, 53, 175–183.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Favre, F., Bogdal, C., Gavillet, S., and Stucki, J.W. (2006) Changes in the CEC of a soil smectitekaolinite clay fraction as induced by structural iron reduction and iron coatings dissolution. Applied Clay Science, 34, 95–104.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Fredrickson, J.K., Zachara, J.M., Kennedy, D.W., Kukkadapu, R.K., McKinley, J.P., Heald, S.M., Liu, C.X., and Plymale, A.E. (2004) Reduction of TcO4 by sediment-associated biogenic Fe(II). Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 68, 3171–3187.[CrossRef][Web of Science][GeoRef]

Freed, R.L. and Peacor, D.R. (1989) Geopressured shale and sealing effect of smectite to illite transition. American Association of Petroleum Geologist Bulletin, 73, 1223–1232.[Abstract][GeoRef]

Furukawa, Y. and O’Reilly, S.E. (2007) Rapid precipitation of amorphous silica in experimental systems with nontronite (NAu-1) and Shewanella oneidensis MR-1. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 71, 363–377.[CrossRef][Web of Science][GeoRef]

Gan, H., Bailey, G.W., and Yu, Y.S. (1996) Morphology of lead(II) and chromium(III) reaction products on phyllosilicate surfaces as determined by atomic force microscopy. Clays and Clay Minerals, 44, 734–743.[Abstract][CrossRef][Web of Science][GeoRef]

Gates, W.P., Wilkinson, H.T., and Stucki, J.W. (1993) Swelling properties of microbially reduced ferruginous smectite. Clays and Clay Minerals, 41, 360–364.[Abstract][CrossRef][Web of Science][GeoRef]

Gates, W.P., Stucki, J.W., and Kirkpatrick, R.J. (1996) Structural properties of reduced Upton montmorillonite. Physics and Chemistry of Minerals, 23, 535–541.[Web of Science][GeoRef]

Gates, W.P., Jaunet, A.M., Tessier, D., Cole, M.A., Wilkinson, H.T., and Stucki, J.W. (1998) Swelling and texture of iron-bearing smectites reduced by bacteria. Clays and Clay Minerals, 46, 487–497.[Abstract][CrossRef][Web of Science][GeoRef]

Gates, W.P., Slade, P.G., Manceau, A., and Lanson, B. (2002) Site occupancies by iron in nontronites. Clays and Clay Minerals, 50, 223–239.[Abstract/Free Full Text][CrossRef][Web of Science][GeoRef]

Hofstetter, T.B., Schwarzenbach, R.P., and Haderlein, S.B. (2003) Reactivity of Fe(II) species associated with clay minerals. Environmental Science and Technology, 37, 519–528.[Medline]

Hofstetter, T.B., Neumann, A., and Schwarzenbach, R.P. (2006) Reduction of nitroaromatic compounds by Fe(II) species associated with iron-rich smectites. Environmental Science and Technology, 40, 235–242.[Medline]

Horne, R.A. (1978) The Chemistry of Our Environment, 869 p. Wiley, New York.

Hower, J., Eslinger, E.V., Hower, M.H., and Perry, E.A. (1976) Mechanism of burial metamorphism of argillaceous sediments. 1. Mineralogical and chemical evidence. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 87, 725–737.[Abstract/Free Full Text][CrossRef][Web of Science][GeoRef]

Huang, W.-L., Longo, J.M., and Pevear, D.R. (1993) An experimentally derived kinetic model for smectite-to-illite conversion and its use as a geothermometer. Clays and Clay Minerals, 41, 162–177.[Abstract][Web of Science][GeoRef]

Huggett, J.M. and Cuadros, J. (2005) Low-temperature illitization of smectite in the late eocene and early oligocene of the Isle of Wight (Hampshire basin), U.K. American Mineralogist, 90, 1192–1202.[Abstract/Free Full Text][CrossRef][Web of Science][GeoRef]

Jaisi, D.P. (2007) Fe(III) reduction in clay minerals and its application to technetium immobilization. Geology, 319 p. Ph.D. dissertation, Miami University, Oxford.

Jaisi, D.P., Kukkadapu, R.K., Eberl, D.D., and Dong, H. (2005) Control of Fe(III) site occupancy on the rate and extent of microbial reduction of Fe(III) in nontronite. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 69, 5429–5440.[CrossRef][Web of Science][GeoRef]

Jaisi, D.P., Dong, H., Kim, J.W., He, Z., and Morton, J.P. (2007a) Particle aggregation kinetics during microbial reduction of Fe(III) in nontronite. Clays and Clay Minerals, 55, 96–107.[Abstract/Free Full Text][CrossRef][Web of Science][GeoRef]

Jaisi, D.P., Dong, H., and Liu, C. (2007b) Influence of biogenic Fe(II) on the extent of microbial reduction of Fe(III) in clay mineral nontronite, illite, and chlorite. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 71, 1145–1158.[CrossRef][Web of Science][GeoRef]

——— (2007c) Kinetics analysis of microbial reduction of Fe(III) in nontronite. Environmental Science and Technology, 41, 2437–2444.[Medline]

Jaisi, D.P., Dong, H., and Morton, J.P. (2008a) Partitioning of Fe(II) in reduced nontronite (NAu-2) to reactive sites: Reactivity in terms of Tc(VII) reduction. Clays and Clay Minerals, 56, 175–189.[Abstract/Free Full Text][CrossRef][Web of Science][GeoRef]

Jaisi, D.P., Ji, S., Dong, H., Blake, R.E., Eberl, D.D., and Kim, J.W. (2008b) Role of microbial Fe(III) reduction and solution chemistry in aggregation and settling of suspended particles in the Mississippi River Delta Plain, Louisiana, U.S.A. Clays and Clay Minerals, 56, 416–428.[Abstract/Free Full Text][CrossRef][Web of Science][GeoRef]

Jaisi, D.P., Dong, H., Plymale, A.E., Fredrickson, J.K., Zachara, J.M., Heald, S.M., and Liu, C. (2009) Reduction and long-term immobilization of technetium by Fe(II) associated with clay mineral nontronite. Chemical Geology, 264, 127–138.[CrossRef][Web of Science][GeoRef]

Joeckel, R.M. and Clement, B.J.A. (2005) Soils, surficial geology, and geomicrobiology of saline-sodic wetlands, North Platte River Valley, Nebraska, U.S.A. Catena, 61, 63–101.[GeoRef]

Jung, H., Park, H., Kim, J., Lee, J.H., Hur, H.G., Myung, N.V., and Choi, H. (2007) Preparation of riotic and abiotic iron oxide nanoparticles (IOnPs) and their properties and applications in heterogeneous catalytic oxidation. Environmental Science and Technology, 41, 4741–4747.[Medline]

Kashefi, K., Shelobolina, E.S., Elliott, W.C., and Lovley, D.R. (2008) Growth of thermophilic and hyperthermophilic Fe (III)-reducing microorganisms on a ferruginous smectite as the sole electron acceptor. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 74, 251–258.[Abstract/Free Full Text][CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Kawano, M. and Tomita, K. (2001) Microbial biomineralization in weathered volcanic ash deposit and formation of biogenic minerals by experimental incubation. American Mineralogist, 86, 400–410.[Abstract/Free Full Text][Web of Science][GeoRef]

——— (2002) Microbiotic formation of silicate minerals in the weathering environment of a pyroclastic deposit. Clays and Clay Minerals, 50, 99–110.[Abstract/Free Full Text][CrossRef][Web of Science][GeoRef]

Kim, J.W., Dong, H., Seabaugh, J., Newell, S.W., and Eberl, D.D. (2004) Role of microbes in the smectite-to-illite reaction. Science, 303, 830–832.[Abstract/Free Full Text][CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline][GeoRef]

Kim, J.W., Furukawa, Y., Dong, H., and Newell, S.W. (2005) The role of microbial Fe(III) reduction in the clay flocculation. Clays and Clay Minerals, 53, 572–579.[Abstract/Free Full Text][CrossRef][Web of Science][GeoRef]

Kirk, G.J.D., Solivas, J.L., and Alberto, M.C. (2003) Effects of flooding and redox conditions on solute diffusion in soil. European Journal of Soil Science, 54, 617–624.[CrossRef][Web of Science][GeoRef]

Komadel, P., Madejova, J., and Stucki, J.W. (2006) Structural Fe(III) reduction in smectites. Applied Clay Science, 34, 88–94.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Komlos, J., Kukkadapu, R.K., Zachara, J.M., and Jaffe, P.R. (2007) Biostimulation of iron reduction and subsequent oxidation of sediment containing Fe-silicates and Fe-oxides: Effect of redox cycling on Fe(III) bioreduction. Water Research, 41, 2996–3004.[Medline]

Komlos, J., Peacock, A., Kukkadapu, R.K., and Jaffe, P.R. (2008) Long-term dynamics of uranium reduction/reoxidation under low sulfate conditions. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 72, 3603–3615.[CrossRef][Web of Science][GeoRef]

Konhauser, K. (2006) Introduction to Geomicrobiology, 425 p. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, U.K.

Konhauser, K.O., Schiffman, P., and Fisher, Q.J. (2002) Microbial mediation of authigenic clays during hydrothermal alteration of basaltic tephra, Kilauea Volcano. Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems, 3, 1075.[CrossRef]

Konig, I., Drodt, M., Suess, E., and Trautwein, A.X. (1997) Iron reduction through the tan-green color transition in deep-sea sediments. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 61, 1679–1683.[CrossRef][Web of Science][GeoRef]

Konig, I., Haeckel, M., Drodt, M., Suess, E., and Trautwein, A.X. (1999) Reactive Fe(II) layers in deep-sea sediments. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 63, 1517–1526.[CrossRef][Web of Science][GeoRef]

Kostka, J.E. and Nealson, K.H. (1998) Isolation, cultivation, and characterization of iron- and manganese-reducing bacteria. In R.S. Burlage, Ed., Techniques in Microbial Ecology, p. 58–78. Oxford University Press, U.K.

Kostka, J.E., Stucki, J.W., Nealson, K.H., and Wu, J. (1996) Reduction of structural Fe(III) in smectite by a pure culture of Shewanella putrefaciens strain MR-1. Clays and Clay Minerals, 44, 522–529.[Abstract][Web of Science][GeoRef]

Kostka, J.E., Haefele, E., Viehweger, R., and Stucki, J.W. (1999a) Respiration and dissolution of iron(III)-containing clay minerals by bacteria. Environmental Science and Technology, 33, 3127–3133.[GeoRef]

Kostka, J.E., Wu, J., Nealson, K.H., and Stucki, J.W. (1999b) The impact of structural Fe(III) reduction by bacteria on the surface chemistry of smectite clay minerals. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 63, 3705–3713.[CrossRef][Web of Science][GeoRef]

Kostka, J.E., Dalton, D.D., Skelton, H., Dollhopf, S., and Stucki, J.W. (2002) Growth of iron(III)-reducing bacteria on clay minerals as the sole electron acceptor and comparison of growth yields on a variety of oxidized iron forms. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 68, 6256–6262.[Abstract/Free Full Text][CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Kukkadapu, R.K., Zachara, J.M., Fredrickson, J.K., McKinley, J.P., Kennedy, D.W., Smith, S.C., and Dong, H.L. (2006) Reductive biotransformation of Fe in shale-limestone saprolite containing Fe(III) oxides and Fe(II)/Fe(III) phyllosilicates. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 70, 3662–3676.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Kump, L.R., Brantley, S.L., and Arthur, M.A. (2000) Chemical weathering, atmospheric CO2, and climate. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 28, 611–667.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Lagaly, G., Ogawa, M., and Dekany, I. (2006) Clay Mineral Organic Interactions. In F. Bergaya, G. Lagaly, and B.G.K. Theng, Eds., Handbook of Clay Science, p. 309–378. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

Lear, P.R. and Stucki, J.W. (1987) Intervalence electron transfer and magnetic exchange in reduced nontronite. Clays and Clay Minerals, 35, 373–378.[Abstract][CrossRef][Web of Science][GeoRef]

Lee, J.H., Kim, M.G., Yoo, B.Y., Myung, N.V., Maeng, J.S., Lee, T., Dohnalkova, A.C., Fredrickson, J.K., Sadowsky, M.J., and Hur, H.G. (2007) Biogenic formation of photoactive arsenic-sulfide nanotubes by Shewanella sp. strain HN-41. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U.S.A., 104, 20410–20415.[Abstract/Free Full Text][CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline][GeoRef]

Lee, K., Kostka, J.E., and Stucki, J.W. (2006) Comparisons of structural iron reduction in smectites by bacteria and dithionite: An infrared spectroscopic study. Clays and Clay Minerals, 54, 197–210.

Li, Y.L., Zhang, C.L., Yang, J., Deng, B., and Vali, H. (2004) Dissolution of nontronite NAu-2 by a sulfate-reducing bacterium. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 68, 3251–3260.[CrossRef][Web of Science][GeoRef]

Lovley, D.R. and Philips, E.J.P. (1988) Novel mode of microbial energy metabolism: organic carbon oxidation coupled to dissimilatory reduction of iron or manganese. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 54, 1472–1480.[Abstract/Free Full Text][Web of Science][Medline]

Lovley, D.R., Giovannoni, S.J., White, D.C., Champine, J.E., Phillips, E.J.P., Gorby, Y.A., and Goodwin, S. (1993) Geobacter metallireducens gen. nov. sp. nov., a microorganism capable of coupling the complete oxidation of organic compounds to the reduction of iron and other metals. Archives of Microbiology, 159, 336–344.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Lovley, D.R., Fraga, J.L., Blunt-Harris, E.L., Hayes, L.A., Philips, E.J.P., and Coates, J.D. (1998) Humic substances as a mediator for microbially catalyzed metal reduction. Acta Hydrochimica et Hydrobiologica, 26, 152–157.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Lyle, M. (1983) The brown-green color transition in marine sediments: A marker of the Fe(III)-Fe(II) redox boundary. Limnology and Oceanography, 28, 1026–1033.[Web of Science][GeoRef]

Masuda, H., Peacor, D.R., and Dong, H. (2001) Transmission electron microscopy study of conversion of smectite to illite in mudstones of the Nankai Trough: Contrast with coeval bentonites. Clays and Clay Minerals, 49, 109–118.[Abstract/Free Full Text][CrossRef][Web of Science][GeoRef]

Mohanty, S.R., Kollah, B., Hedrick, D.B., Peacock, A.D., Kukkadapu, R.K., and Roden, E.E. (2008) Biogeochemical processes in ethanol stimulated uranium-contaminated subsurface sediments. Environmental Science and Technology, 42, 4384–4390.[Medline]

Moore, D.M. and Reynolds Jr., R.C. (1997) X-ray Diffraction and the Identification and Analysis of Clay Minerals, 378 p. Oxford University Press, New York.

Neumann, A., Hofstetter, T.B., Lussi, M., Cirpka, O.A., Petit, S., and Schwarzenbach, R.P. (2008) Assessing the redox reactivity of structural iron in smectites using nitroaromatic compounds as kinetic probes. Environmental Science and Technology, 42, 8381–8387.[Medline]

Nevin, K.P. and Lovley, D.R. (2002) Mechanisms for Fe(III) oxide reduction in sedimentary environments. Geomicrobiological Journal, 19, 141–159.[CrossRef]

Nichols, C.M., Bowman, J.P., and Guezennec, J. (2005) Olleya marilimosa gen. nov., sp nov., an exopolysaccharide-producing marine bacterium from the family Flavobacteriaceae, isolated from the Southern Ocean. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 55, 1557–1561.[Abstract/Free Full Text][CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

O’Reilly, S.E., Watkins, J., and Furukawa, Y. (2005) Secondary mineral formation associated with respiration of nontronite, NAu-1 by iron reducing bacteria. Geochemical Transations, 6, 67–76.[CrossRef]

O’Reilly, S.E., Furukawa, Y., and Newell, S. (2006) Dissolution and microbial Fe(III) reduction of nontronite (NAu-1). Chemical Geology, 235, 1–11.[CrossRef][Web of Science][GeoRef]

Parthasarathy, G., Choudary, B.M., Sreedhar, B., and Kunwar, A.C. (2007) Environmental mineralogy: spectroscopic studies on ferrous saponite and the reduction of hexavalent chromium. Natural Hazards, 40, 647–655.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Peacor, D.R. (1992) Diagenesis and low-grade metamorphism of shales and slates. In P.R. Buseck, Ed., Minerals and Reactions at the Atomic Scale: Transmission Electron Microscopy, 27, p. 335–380. Reviews in Mineralogy, Mineralogical Society of America, Chantilly, Virginia.

Peretyazhko, T., Zachara, J.M., Heald, S.M., Jeon, B.-H., Kukkadapu, R.K., Liu, C., Moore, D., and Resch, C.T. (2008) Heterogeneous reduction of Tc(VII) by Fe(II) at the solid–water interface. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 72, 1521–1539.[CrossRef][Web of Science][GeoRef]

Pevear, D.R. (1999) Illite and hydrocarbon exploration. Proceedings of National Academy of Science, 96, 3440–3446.[Abstract/Free Full Text][CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline][GeoRef]

Poulet, F., Bibring, J.P., Mustard, J.F., Gendrin, A., Mangold, N., Langevin, Y., Arvidson, R.E., Gondet, B., and Gomez, C. (2005) Phyllosilicates on Mars and implications for early martian climate. Nature, 438, 623–627.[CrossRef][Medline][GeoRef]

Pytte, A.M. and Reynolds Jr., R.C. (1989) The thermal transformation of smectite to illite. In N.D. Naeser and T.H. McCulloh, Eds., Thermal History of Sedimentary Basins: Methods and Case Histories, p. 133–140. Springer-Verlag, New York.

Raven, J.A. (2003) Cycling silicon—the role of accumulation in plants. New Phytologist, 158, 419–421.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Reed, D.W., Fujita, Y., Delwiche, M.E., Blackwelder, D.B., Sheridan, P.P., Uchida, T., and Colwell, F.S. (2002) Microbial communities from methane hydrate-bearing deep marine sediments in a forearc basin. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 68, 3759–3770.[Abstract/Free Full Text][CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Roden, E.E. and Urrutia, M.M. (1999) Ferrous iron removal promotes microbial reduction of crystalline iron(III) oxides. Environmental Science and Technology, 73, 1847–1853.

——— (2002) Influence of biogenic Fe(II) on bacterial crystalline Fe(III) oxide reduction. Geomicrobiological Journal, 19, 209–251.[CrossRef]

Roden, E.E. and Wetzel, R.G. (2002) Kinetics of microbial Fe(III) oxide reduction in freshwater wetland sediments. Limnology and Oceanography, 47, 198–211.[Web of Science][GeoRef]

Rogers, J.R. and Bennett, P.C. (2004) Mineral stimulation of subsurface microorganisms: Release of limiting nutrients from silicates. Chemical Geology, 203, 91–108.[CrossRef][Web of Science][GeoRef]

Seabaugh, J.L., Dong, H., Kukkadapu, R.K., Eberl, D.D., Morton, J.P., and Kim, J.W. (2006) Microbial reduction of Fe(III) in the Fithian and Muloorina illites: Contrasting extents and rates of bioredcution. Clays and Clay Minerals, 54, 67–79.[Abstract/Free Full Text][CrossRef][Web of Science][GeoRef]

Shelobolina, E.S., Vanpraagh, C.G., and Lovley, D.R. (2003) Use of ferric and ferrous iron containing minerals for respiration by Desulfitobacterium frappieri. Geomicrobiology Journal, 20, 143–156.[CrossRef][Web of Science][GeoRef]

Shelobolina, E.S., Anderson, R.T., Vodyanitskii, Y.N., Sivtsov, A.V., Yuretich, R., and Lovley, D.R. (2004) Importance of clay size minerals for Fe(III) respiration in a petroleum-contaminated aquifer. Geobiology, 2, 67–76.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Shen, S. and Stucki, J.W. (1994) Effects of iron oxidation state on the fate and behavior of potassium in soils. In J.L. Havlin and J.S. Jacobsen, Eds., Soil Testing: Prospects for Improving Nutrient Recommendations, 40, p. 173–185. SSSA Special Publication, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin.

Stanjek, H. and Marchel, C. (2008) Linking the redox cycles of Fe oxides and Fe-rich clay minerals: an example from a palaeosol of the Upper Freshwater Molasse. Clay Minerals, 43, 69–82.[Abstract/Free Full Text][CrossRef][Web of Science]

Stucki, J.W. (2006) Properties and behavior of iron in clay minerals. In F. Bergaya, G. Lagaly, and B.G.K. Theng, Eds., Handbook of Clay Science, p. 423–476. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

——— (2009) Iron redox reactions in smectites. 46th Clay Minerals Society Annual Meeting, Billings, Montana, p. 47.

Stucki, J.W. and Kostka, J.E. (2006) Microbial reduction of iron in smectite. Comptes Rendus Geoscience, 338, 468–475.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Stucki, J.W., Komadel, P., and Wilkinson, H.T. (1987) Microbial reduction of structural iron(III) in smectites. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 51, 1663–1665.[Abstract/Free Full Text][Web of Science]

Stucki, J.W., Lee, K., Zhang, L., and Larson, R.A. (2002) The effects of iron oxidation state on the surface and structural properties of smectites. Pure Applied Chemistry, 74, 2079–2092.

Stucki, J.W., Lee, K., Goodman, B.A., and Kostka, J.E. (2007) Effects of in situ biostimulation on iron mineral speciation in a sub-surface soil. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 71, 835–843.[CrossRef][Web of Science][GeoRef]

Stumm, W. and Sulzberger, B. (1992) The cycling of iron in natural environments considerations based on laboratory studies of heterogeneous redox processes. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 56, 3233–3257.[CrossRef][Web of Science][GeoRef]

Sutherland, I.W. (2001) Biofilm exopolysaccharides: a strong and sticky framework. Microbiology, 147, 3–9.[Free Full Text][Web of Science][Medline]

Taylor, R.W., Shen, S., Bleam, W.F., and Tu, S.I. (2000) Chromate removal by dithionite-reduced clays: evidence from direct X-ray absportion near edge spectroscopy (XANES) of chromate reduction at clay surfaces. Clays and Clay Minerals, 48, 648–654.[Abstract/Free Full Text][CrossRef][Web of Science][GeoRef]

Tazaki, K. (2006) Clays, microorganisms, and biomineralization. In F. Bergaya, G. Lagaly, and B.G.K. Theng, Eds., Handbook of Clay Science, p. 477–498. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

Urrutia, M.M., Roden, E.E., Fredrickson, J.K., and Zachara, J.M. (1998) Microbial and surface chemistry controls on reduction of synthetic Fe(III) oxide minerals by the dissimilatory iron-reducing bacterium Shewanella alga. Geomicrobiology Journal, 15, 269–291.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Vorhies, J.S. and Gaines, R.R. (2009) Microbial dissolution of clay minerals as a source of iron and silica in marine sediments. Nature Geoscience, 2, 221–225.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Weaver, C.E. (1960) Possible uses of clay minerals in search for oil. American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 44, 1505–1518.

Welch, S.A. and Banfield, J.F. (2002) Modification of olivine surface morphology and reactivity by microbial activity during chemical weathering. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 66, 213–221.[CrossRef][Web of Science][GeoRef]

Welch, S.A., Barker, W.W., and Banfield, J.F. (1999) Microbial extracellular polysaccharides and plagioclase dissolution. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 63, 1405–1419.[CrossRef][Web of Science][GeoRef]

Welch, S.A., Taunton, A.E., and Banfield, J.F. (2002) Effect of microorganisms and microbial metabolites on apatite dissolution. Geomicrobiology Journal, 19, 343–367.[CrossRef][Web of Science][GeoRef]

Whitney, G. (1990) Role of water in the semctite to illite reaction. Clays and Clay Minerals, 38, 343–350.[Abstract][CrossRef][Web of Science][GeoRef]

Wu, J., Roth, C.B., and Low, P.F. (1988) Biological reduction of structural iron in sodium-nontronite. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 52, 295–296.[Abstract/Free Full Text][Web of Science]

Xu, J.C., Stucki, J.W., Wu, J., Kostka, J.E., and Sims, G.K. (2001) Fate of atrazine and alachlor in redox-treated ferruginous smectite. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 20, 2717–2724.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Zhang, G., Dong, H., Kim, J.W., and Eberl, D.D. (2007a) Microbial reduction of structural Fe3+ in nontronite by a thermophilic bacterium and its role in promoting the smectite to illite reaction. American Mineralogist, 92, 1411–1419.[Abstract/Free Full Text][CrossRef][Web of Science][GeoRef]

Zhang, G., Kim, J.W., Dong, H., and Sommer, A.J. (2007b) Microbial effects in promoting the smectite to illite reaction: role of organic matter intercalated in the interlayer. American Mineralogist, 92, 1401–1410.[Abstract/Free Full Text][CrossRef][GeoRef]

Zhang, G.X. (2006) Geomicrobial processes and diversity in ultra-high pressure metamorphic rocks and deep fluids from Chinese continental scientific deep drilling. Geology, 216 p. Ph.D. dissertation, Miami, Oxford.



This Article
Right arrow Abstract
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dong, H.
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, G.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation


JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2010 by Mineralogical Society of America