Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
American Mineralogist
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

American Mineralogist; November-December 2009; v. 94; no. 11-12; p. 1616-1619; DOI: 10.2138/am.2009.3262
© 2009 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Abstract
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Helffrich, G.
Right arrow Articles by Connolly, J.A.D.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Physical contradictions and remedies using simple polythermal equations of state

George Helffrich1,* and J.A.D. Connolly2

1 Department of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Wills Memorial Building, Queen’s Road, Bristol BS8 1RJ, U.K.
2 Institute for Mineralogy and Petrography, ETH Zurich, Sonneggstrasse 5, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland

Correspondence: * E-mail: george{at}geology.bristol.ac.uk


    ABSTRACT
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Problem statement
 Alternative parameterization
 Discussion
 Acknowledgments
 References cited
 
Simple polythermal extensions to two widely used isothermal equations of state, the Murnaghan and the Birch-Murnaghan, can lead to non-physical material behavior without proper parameterization: the thermal expansivity at high pressure can become negative. We show how this arises and propose a remedy using an approximation to the thermal relaxation of the bulk modulus. Using the revised equation of state for thermodynamic equilibrium calculations leads to low-pressure and -temperature behavior indistinguishable from the unmodified equation of state, yet extrapolates to high pressure and temperature without non-physical behavior.

Key Words: Thermodynamics • equation of state properties • phase equilibria • calculation • high-pressure studies • expansivity measurements • negative expansivity


    INTRODUCTION
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Problem statement
 Alternative parameterization
 Discussion
 Acknowledgments
 References cited
 
Phase equilibrium calculations are routine practice for metamorphic petrologists (e.g., Schumacher et al. 2008) and coming into vogue for the calculation of seismic wavespeeds in structural studies of the mantle and core (Sobolev and Babeyko 1994; Connolly and Kerrick 2002; Helffrich and Kaneshima 2004; Stixrude and Lithgow-Bertelloni 2005; Richard et al. 2005). One reason for this is the development and packaging of efficient algorithms for phase equilibrium calculation that employ simply parameterized equations of state (Holland and Powell 1998). Phase equilibrium is typically calculated using the deviation of free energy, dG, from reference temperature T and pressure P conditions (Tr, Pr) via


Formula 1(1)

where the first integral involving volume (V) is done isothermally and the second involving entropy (S), isobarically. Due to the wealth of 1 bar thermophysical property measurements, the T integral is usually done at Pr = 1 bar. This requires the P integral to be done at T. Consequently, there is a need for V(T) at 1 bar, as well as volume equation of state parameters usable at high T.

For fixed bulk composition, equilibrium calculations are based on the scalar function G(P,T). Once G is calculated, the stable phase assemblage may be found by minimizing G subject to the bulk composition constraint. At that point, both the constituent mineral properties and the system properties may be found from G using various thermodynamic identities. For example, because V is ({partial}G/{partial}P)T, numerical or analytic derivatives of G yield the volumes. Of especial interest in this family of properties is the thermal expansivity, {alpha} = (1/V)({partial}V/{partial}T)P, which may be obtained from phase or system properties via


Formula 2(2)

This represents the high-pressure and -temperature expansivity. Continuum theories of material behavior posit a positive-definite strain energy function to define material mechanical stability. The strain tensor, Eij, includes a thermal component through {alpha}


Formula 3(3)

and also depends on the material parameters Poisson’s ratio {nu}, Young’s modulus E, and stress tensor {sigma}ij ({delta}ij is the Kronecker delta symbol). The work dW done by straining a material is (Malvern 1969)


Formula 4(4)

If {alpha} were negative at any pressure, thermal energy added to the substance would derive work from it. One could alternatively say that adiabatic compression of the material would cool it: planetary interiors could be colder than their surfaces in absent internal heat sources. This is non-geophysical behavior, though some substances exhibit negative {alpha} due to geometric peculiarities at low pressures and temperatures (Pryde et al. 1996).

We show that this form of non-physical behavior can arise if the thermal part of the volume equation of state is not integrated properly with the compression part of the equation of state. Examples and a straightforward remedy based on an observationally justified approximation to simultaneous high-P and -T mineral behavior follow.


    PROBLEM STATEMENT
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Problem statement
 Alternative parameterization
 Discussion
 Acknowledgments
 References cited
 
Typical choices for the volume equation of state (EOS) are the Murnaghan and Birch-Murnaghan (Poirier 1991). The two involve the bulk modulus,


Formula 5(5)

where S/T denotes either adiabatic or isothermal conditions as appropriate. This definition itself constitutes a simple, but not very good, volume EOS by integration assuming constant bulk modulus, K. The Murnaghan and Birch-Murnaghan EOSs are successive refinements to the constant bulk modulus approximation. The Murnaghan EOS adopts the reasonable physical assumption that squeezed material resists more squeezing due to increased repulsive forces between the atoms comprising a substance. Thus KT increases linearly with pressure with scale factor K' = dKT/dP. The Birch-Murnaghan EOS elaborates on the same idea using finite strain to better account for high compressions at high P.

Both EOSs are typically isothermal. From Poirier (1991) Equation 4.7,


Formula 6(6)

Adding the thermal component to Vr and KT and neglecting the effect of temperature on K', which is small (Anderson and Isaak 1993), yields


Formula 7(6')

An obvious parameterization of KT(T) is to assume it declines linearly, with constant dKT/dT, as theory and laboratory observations suggest (Born and Huang 1954; Isaak et al. 1998), and as many compilations employ (Fei and Saxena 1990; Sobolev and Babeyko 1994; Gerya et al. 2004; Mattern et al. 2005). Taking the high-pressure temperature derivative of Equation 6' as specified by Equation 2,


Formula 8(7)

We seek a zero to this expression to show that, at some point, the EOS leads to negative {alpha}. Setting the left-hand side to zero, noting that V(T) is strictly positive and that


Formula 8

is also strictly positive when KT (T) > 0, this simplifies to


Formula 9(8)

Solving for the pressure Pz when {alpha} is zero (going negative)


Formula 10(9)

For insight into the severity of the problem, take {alpha} to be a constant {alpha}0. (dKT)/(dT) will be strictly negative, so the requirement that P be positive leads to


Formula 11(10)

For {alpha}0K' {approx} 10–4 K–1, KT {approx} 106 bars, a negative {alpha} is virtually guaranteed for typical (dKT)/(dT) values, which are usually a few hundred bars/K (Holland and Powell 1998).

A similar treatment may be applied to the Birch-Murnaghan equation, but with more algebraic work and less insight. The isothermal Birch-Murnaghan equation is (Poirier 1991, Eq. 4.41)


Formula 12(11)

The finite strain f = 1/2[(Vr /V)2/3 – 1] and {varphi} = 3(K' – 4)/4. Adding polythermal behavior explicitly,


Formula 13(11')

with f now denoting finite strain relative to V(T). Evaluating the desired derivative by chain rule yields


Formula 14(12)

which requires only an expression for dP/dT. Using the results (not derived for brevity) that df/dV = – (1 + 2f)/(3V) and df/dT = (df/dV)(dV/dT) = 2{alpha}(1 + 2f)/3, we write


Formula 15(13)

Substituting Equation 13 into Equation 12 yields the desired expression


Formula 16(14)

Setting the left-hand side to zero and solving for Pz, and dividing out the always positive V yields the pressure at which the thermal expansivity becomes zero:


Formula 17(15)

for mantle strains, where f ≤ 0.1. For dKT/dT {approx} –2 x 102 bars/K, {alpha} {approx} 3 x 10–5 K–1 and KT {approx} 106 bars, {alpha} becomes zero at about 30 GPa, a planetary pressure range plausibly encountered in phase equilibrium calculations.


    ALTERNATIVE PARAMETERIZATION
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Problem statement
 Alternative parameterization
 Discussion
 Acknowledgments
 References cited
 
The negative {alpha} arises due to the constant negative dKT/dT. An alternative bulk modulus thermal dependence comes from the Anderson-Grüneisen parameter, defined as


Formula 18(16)

and is approximately a constant (Anderson and Isaak 1993). For a quasiharmonic parameter q = 1, Anderson and Isaak (1993) find that {delta}T = K, and that {delta} has no dependence on compression. This approximation may be usefully combined with the Murnaghan equation for a simple equation of state good for pressures to mid-Earth conditions when strains exceed the Murnaghan equation’s applicability. Rather than KT(T) = KT0 + (dKT/dT)(T Tr), use Equation 16 to infer that


Formula 19(17)

showing that KT decays exponentially with T at a rate proportional to the volumetric expansion of the mineral with T. This in turn suggests that the instantaneous dKT/dT is always negative but approaches zero at high T. Also of service is another relation that follows from the definition of {delta}T,


Formula 20(18)

Proceeding as before to examine the possibility of {alpha}(P,T) becoming negative, form an expression for {partial}V/{partial}T at high pressure:


Formula 21(19)

We seek a zero to this expression to show that at some point the EOS leads to negative {alpha}. Setting the left-hand side to zero, noting that V(T) and zero pressure {alpha} are strictly positive, and also noting that


Formula 21

is strictly positive, this simplifies to


Formula 22(20)

Solving for Pz where {alpha}(P,T) equals zero,


Formula 23(21)

which rearranges as


Formula 24(22)

If {delta}T = K' as initially assumed, at no finite pressure will {alpha}(P,T) be zero. For brevity, we call this the modified Murnaghan EOS.

Because a good approximation to {delta}T is already available in thermodynamic compilations, either through explicit tabulation (Fei and Saxena 1990; Sobolev and Babeyko 1990; Gerya et al. 2004; Helffrich and Kaneshima 2004; Mattern et al. 2005) or assuming that for all substances K' {approx} 4 (Holland and Powell 1998), whence {delta}T {approx} 4, one can employ the modified Murnaghan EOS without change to existing mineral thermophysical property compilations. If {delta}T is available and exceeds KT, the difference is unlikely to exceed unity (Anderson et al. 1992). Thus Pz will be on the order of KT, ~106 bars, a pressure that invalidates Murnaghan EOS use.

As a concrete example, Figure 1Go shows phase equilibria for the system K2O-Al2O3-SiO2 at high pressures calculated using the Murnaghan and the modified Murnaghan EOS. Yong et al. (2006) refined the thermodynamic data for the phases K-hollandite and Si-wadeite that we show calculated with the Perple_X program (Connolly 2005). Thermophysical data relevant to phase volumetric properties are listed in Table 1Go.


Figure 1
View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 1. Plot of calculated stability fields for minerals in the K2O-Al2O3-SiO2 system using alternative equation of state formulations. Solid lines show stability fields calculated using the polythermal Murnaghan EOS (Eq. 6); dashed lines show them using the modified Murnaghan EOS. Notable differences occur in reactions involving wadeite, a phase that exhibits non-physical negative thermal expansivity due to the unmodified Murnaghan EOS. Most curves superimpose one another, indicating the equivalence of the two formulations at low pressures. Mineral name/abbreviations used: corundum/crn, stishovite/stv, coesite/coe, kyanite/ky, hollandite/holl, wadeite/wade, sanidine/sa, leucite/lct, quartz/qtz.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1. Thermophysical data for selected phases
 
With the exception of hollandite and wadeite, the differences calculated by either EOS are small (Fig. 1Go). Using Equation 9 and the wadeite data in Table 1Go, the negative {alpha}(P,T) onset at 1300 K is 8.1 GPa, the range of significant divergence shown in the figure. In the Holland and Powell (1998) database, we found that anomalies arise for pressures <10 GPa and temperatures <2000 K for about 10% of the end-member phases. Of interest is that all SiO2 polymorphs, except stishovite, suffer from negative high-pressure thermal expansivity.


    DISCUSSION
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Problem statement
 Alternative parameterization
 Discussion
 Acknowledgments
 References cited
 
Simple to calculate equations of state are efficient for phase equilibrium calculations. We showed that two commonly used equations of state, the Murnaghan and the Birch-Murnaghan, are prone to non-physical behavior if their polythermal behavior is not properly parameterized. We focused on the positivity of thermal expansivity due to its role in defining the adiabatic gradient in planets (dT/dz = {alpha}gT/CP; g is gravitational acceleration and CP is heat capacity) and its role in calculating seismic wavespeeds [e.g., {rho}VP2 = KT(1 + T{alpha}{gamma}) + 4/3µ; {gamma} is the Grüneisen parameter, ~1 for most substances, {rho} the density, and µ is the shear modulus]. We showed how a straightforward change to the thermal component of the equation of state can remedy this flaw. The virtue is that at low pressures and temperatures, the calculated results using either parameterization are indistinguishable and the method advocated here does not lead to non-physical behavior under any circumstances. This is potentially of benefit in any phase equilibrium calculation implementation.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Problem statement
 Alternative parameterization
 Discussion
 Acknowledgments
 References cited
 
Eric Essene inspired this paper. We also thank Cheril Cheverton for adroit editorial comments, and the two anonymous reviewers for their insights.


    Footnotes
 
MANUSCRIPT HANDLED BY HONGWU XU

MANUSCRIPT RECEIVED March 31, 2009; MANUSCRIPT ACCEPTED July 20, 2009


    REFERENCES CITED
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Problem statement
 Alternative parameterization
 Discussion
 Acknowledgments
 References cited
 

Anderson, O.L. and Isaak, D.G. (1993) The dependence of the Anderson-Grüneisen parameter {delta}T upon compression at extreme conditions. Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids, 54, 221–227.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Anderson, O.L., Isaak, D.G., and Oda, H. (1992) High-temperature elastic constant data on minerals relevant to geophysics. Reviews of Geophysics, 30, 57–90.[Web of Science][GeoRef]

Born, M. and Huang, K. (1954) Dynamical Theory of Crystal Lattices, xii+420 p. Clarendon, Oxford.

Connolly, J.A.D. (2005) Computation of phase equilibria by linear programming: A tool for geodynamic modeling and its application to subduction zone decarbonation. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 236, 524–541.[CrossRef][Web of Science][GeoRef]

Connolly, J.A.D. and Kerrick, D.M. (2002) Metamorphic controls on seismic velocity of subducted oceanic crust at 100–250 km depth. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 204, 61–74.[CrossRef][Web of Science][GeoRef]

Fei, Y.W. and Saxena, S.K. (1990) Internally consistent thermodynamic data and equilibrium phase relations for compounds in the system MgO-SiO2 at high pressure and high temperature. Journal of Geophysical Research, 95, 6915–6928.[GeoRef]

Gerya, T.V., Podlesskii, K.K., Perchuk, L.L., and Maresch, W.V. (2004) Semiempirical Gibbs free energy formulations for minerals and fluids for use in thermodynamic databases of petrological interest. Physics and Chemistry of Minerals, 31, 429–455.[Web of Science][GeoRef]

Helffrich, G. and Kaneshima, S. (2004) Seismological constraints on core composition from Fe-O-S liquid immiscibility. Science, 306, 2239–2242.[Abstract/Free Full Text][CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline][GeoRef]

Holland, T.J.B. and Powell, R. (1998) An internally consistent thermodynamic data set for phases of petrological interest. Journal of Metmorphic Geology, 16, 309–343.[CrossRef]

Isaak, D.G., Carnes, J.D., Anderson, O.L., and Cynn, H. (1998) Elasticity of TiO2 rutile to 1800 K. Physics and Chemistry of Minerals, 26, 31–43.[CrossRef][Web of Science][GeoRef]

Malvern, L.E. (1969) Introduction to the Mechanics of a Continuous Medium, xii+713 p. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.

Mattern, E., Matas, J., Ricard, Y., and Bass, J. (2005) Lower mantle composition and temperature from mineral physics and thermodynamic modelling. Geophysical Journal International, 160, 973–990.[CrossRef][Web of Science][GeoRef]

Poirier, J.-P. (1991) An introduction to the physics of the Earth’s interior, x+264 p. Cambridge University Press, U.K.

Pryde, A.K.A., Hammonds, K.D., Dove, M.T., Heine, V., Gale, J.D., and Warren, M.C. (1996) Origin of the negative thermal expansion in ZrW2O8 and ZrV2O7. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 8, 10973–10982.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Richard, Y., Mattern, E., and Matas, J. (2005) Synthetic tomographic images of slabs from mineral physics. In R.D. van der Hilst, Ed., Earth’s Deep Mantle: Structure, Composition, and Evolution, p. 285–302. AGU, Washington, D.C.

Schumacher, J.C., Brady, J.B., Cheney, J.T., and Tonnsen, R.R. (2008) Glaucophane- bearing marbles on Syros, Greece. Journal of Petrology, 49, 1667–1686.[Abstract/Free Full Text][CrossRef][Web of Science][GeoRef]

Sobolev, S.V. and Babeyko, A.Y. (1994) Modeling of mineralogical composition, density, and elastic wave velocities in anyhdrous magmatic rocks. Surveys in Geophysics, 15, 515–544.[CrossRef][Web of Science][GeoRef]

Stixrude, L. and Lithgow-Bertelloni, C. (2005) Mineralogy and elasticity of the oceanic upper mantle: Origin of the low-velocity zone. Journal of Geophysical Research, 110, B03204, DOI: 10.1029/2004JB002965.[CrossRef]

Yong, W., Dachs, E., Withers, A.C., and Essene, E.J. (2006) Heat capacity and phase equilibria of hollandite polymorph of KAlSi3O8. Physics and Chemistry of Minerals, 33, 167–177.[CrossRef][Web of Science][GeoRef]



This Article
Right arrow Abstract
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Helffrich, G.
Right arrow Articles by Connolly, J.A.D.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation


JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2010 by Mineralogical Society of America