Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
American Mineralogist Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

American Mineralogist; November-December 2009; v. 94; no. 11-12; p. 1698-1706; DOI: 10.2138/am.2009.3181
© 2009 Mineralogical Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Abstract
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by De Giudici, G.
Right arrow Articles by Casu, M.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Structural properties of biologically controlled hydrozincite: An HRTEM and NMR spectroscopic study

Giovanni De Giudici1,*, Francesca Podda1, Roberta Sanna3, Elodia Musu1, Riccardo Tombolini2, Carla Cannas3, Anna Musinu3 and Mariano Casu3

1 Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Università di Cagliari, via Trentino 51-I-09127 Cagliari, Italy
2 Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Biomediche Sez. Microbiologia Applicata, via Porcell 4-I-09124 Cagliari, Italy
3 Dipartimento di Scienze Chimiche, Complesso Universitario, S.S. 554-I-09042 Monserrato, Cagliari, Italy

Correspondence: * E-mail: gbgiudic{at}unica.it


    ABSTRACT
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Experimental methods
 Results and discussion
 Acknowledgments
 References cited
 
The microscopic properties of biomineral hydrozincite [Zn5(CO3)2(OH)6] from Naracauli Creek (SW Sardinia) were investigated by using X-ray diffraction (XRD), nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM). Because the biomineral hydrozincite turned out to significantly deviate from the ideal structure of hydrozincite, synthetic and geologic hydrozincite samples were also investigated for comparison.

SEM imaging shows that biomineral hydrozincite is made of small platelet-shaped crystallites having a 20–50 nm long side at the shortest and other sides measuring hundreds of nanometers long. These are interlaced to form sheaths several micrometers long. HRTEM analysis of the biomineral samples shows an imperfectly oriented aggregation of the nanocrystals that is discussed in terms of mesocrystals. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and XRD analysis indicate a progressive decrease in the size of the particles in the biomineral compared to the synthetic and geologic hydrozincite samples, with coherent diffraction domains in the biomineral hydrozincite that are smaller by 30–50% than in the other samples investigated in this study. 13C magic angle spinning (MAS) and cross polarization magic angle spinning (CPMAS) NMR spectra show more than one peak for all the investigated samples, despite the fact that carbon atoms have a unique crystallographic position in the hydrozincite structure. The additional peaks can reflect the presence of lattice defects typical of nanocrystals as indicated by the HRTEM images, where high concentration of lattice defects, such as grain boundaries and stacking modes, can be observed both in the biomineral and in the synthetic samples. Further additional peaks in the NMR spectra of biomineral samples are attributed to organic molecules, relicts of the biomineralization process, in agreement with the filaments observed in SEM images of biomineral samples.

Key Words: Biomineralization • hydrous carbonates • hydrozincite • nanocrystals • lattice defects


    INTRODUCTION
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Experimental methods
 Results and discussion
 Acknowledgments
 References cited
 
In the last several years, interactions between microbes and minerals have attracted the interest of the scientific community. The pioneering work of Lowenstam (1981) identified two types of biomineralization: (1) biologically induced mineralization (BIM) with minerals forming as a by-product of the cell’s metabolic activity and (2) biologically controlled mineralization (BCM), a regulated process allowing the organism to precipitate minerals that serve some physiological purpose. Such a distinction is based on the causative effect that microorganisms have on mineralization and is commonly accepted (see Skinner 2005, and references therein). Almost all biominerals are composite materials that consist of both mineral and organic components (Weiner and Dove 2003). Furthermore, the crystals of biominerals are nanosized and their surface energy is often biologically controlled via adsorption-desorption reactions of molecules typically related to biological activity (namely aspartate, acetate, citrate, etc.). This affects nucleation and growth and leads to surface features that are significantly different from the inorganically formed counterpart (De Yoreo and Vekilov 2003). In addition, the crystal structures of biominerals can be affected by many defects, such as point defects and dislocations, twinning, and other lattice defects, which cause low crystallinity of the mineral (Weiner and Dove 2003).

A zinc carbonate, hydrozincite [Zn5(CO3)2(OH)6], in association with cyanobacteria (Scytonema sp.) and algae (Chlorella) (Podda et al. 2000), has been found in a mine environment at Naracauli Creek (Sardinia, Italy).

The crystal structure of hydrozincite was first studied in a geologic sample by using single-crystal X-ray diffraction (Ghose 1964). This author also found that synthetic crystals of hydrozincite have low crystallinity and speculated that plane defects are the likely cause of the observed decrease in crystal order. Infrared spectra from several hydrozincite specimens can differ significantly and show peak broadening (Jambor 1966; Zabinsky 1966). This difference was explained as the contributions of different plane defects. Jambor (1964) and, more recently, Hales and Frost (2007) proposed that hydrous zinc carbonate could have two or more polymorphs. In addition to those structural studies, hydrozincite has attracted the interest of many authors because of its role in the corrosion of Zn-rich materials (Stoffyn-Egli et al. 1998; Morales et al. 2006; Ghosh and Singh 2007), for its involvement in controlling the mobility of zinc in soils (Uygur and Rimmer 2000) and waters (Mercy et al. 1998; Podda et al. 2000; Zuddas and Podda 2005). The occurrence of hydrozincite forming in Zn-polluted calcareous soils was recently documented by Jacquat et al. (2008).

At Naracauli Creek, as already shown in the literature, the precipitation of this biomineral results in the reduction of zinc concentration from 348 to 2 ppm within a few hundred meters downstream. In addition, Pb concentration in the biominerals attains 6500 ppm, Cd concentrations 540 ppm, and many other heavy metals were detected in high concentration in Naracauli hydrozincite (see Table 1Go in Podda et al. 2000). Naracauli biomineralization is thus effective also in the uptake of heavy metals other than Zn. Recent investigations on the in vitro reproduction of Naracauli hydrozincite biomineralization indicate that Scytonema sp. exerts a control on the morphology of hydrozincite crystals (De Giudici et al. 2007). These authors consider hydrozincite as a BCM.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1. Chemical shift (ppm), FWHM (ppm), and percentage of carbon CPMAS signals decomposed into individual Gaussians for geologic samples (Geol1 and Geol2), synthetic samples (Synth1 and Synth2), collected with 4 ms contact time and biomineral sample (Nar) collected with 1 ms contact time
 
Modeling and prediction of reactivity and solubility of minerals are central to many environmental technologies. As documented in the literature (Land et al. 1999; Madden and Hochella 2005; De Giudici et al. 2005; and references therein), many factors such as surface area, and lattice defects and their concentration affect the surface adsorption reactions, reactivity and solubility of mineral surfaces. Despite the rapid development of nanotechnologies, the environmental risks linked to the use of nanomaterial are poorly known (see also Lubick 2008). Especially for nanocrystals, direct knowledge of nanoscopic properties (morphological features, crystal size and lattice defects) is a prerequisite for modeling and predicting the mechanisms of reactions in the biosphere.

The objective of this work is to investigate the differences between the structure of hydrozincite crystals grown under the control of bacteria, geologic samples, and synthetic samples. Hydrozincite samples are investigated by both spectroscopic and microscopic techniques.


    EXPERIMENTAL METHODS
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Experimental methods
 Results and discussion
 Acknowledgments
 References cited
 
Samples used in this study
Five specimens of hydrozincite were investigated in this study. Geol1 and Geol2 are geologic samples from Malfidano Mine and Sa Duchessa Mine, respectively, both located in Sardinia, Italy, kindly provided to us by the Mineral Museum of the Earth Science Department of the University of Cagliari. These samples come from supergene Zn mineralization (calamine) and are more than one million years old (Boni et al. 2003). Given the order-disorder processes that characterize the lattice properties of hydrozincite (Ghose 1964; Zabinsky 1966), they were chosen as a best-crystallized standard. Synth1 was synthesized by fast precipitation from water at 373 K according to the protocol of Garcia-Clavel et al. (1989), whereas Synth2 was synthesized by slow precipitation at 298 K by adapting the calcium carbonate synthesis protocol of Paquette and Reeder (1995). The only change was that zinc nitrate, instead of calcium chloride, was added. Nar is a biomineral from Naracauli Creek (Sardinia, Italy, see Podda et al. 2000). The major elemental concentrations were determined by inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES; FISONS-ARL3520). Carbon and nitrogen contents were obtained by using a Fisons Instruments 1108 CHNS (T = 1000 °C) elemental analyzer. Other trace element concentrations were determined by inductively-coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS; Perkin-Elmer; ELAN 5000). During approximately 10 years of periodic sample collection at Naracauli Creek, several samples were analyzed for chemical composition and structure. The results do not show significant differences in chemical composition or morphological and structural features; therefore the Nar sample analyzed in the present study can be considered an appropriate reference for the hydrozincite samples of Naracauli Creek.

Analytical techniques
Microscopic surface features of the samples were investigated with an environmental scanning electron microscope (ESEM QUANTA 200, FEI, Hillsboro, Oregon).

The samples were lightly ground in an agate mortar and ~200 mg of the powder of each sample was packed into the sample holder for the X-ray diffraction analysis. XRD was performed with a {theta}-2{theta} conventional diffractometer (Siemens D-500) with MoK{alpha} radiation (0.709 Å). High-resolution NMR spectra were collected using a spectrometer with a 9.39 T wide-bore Oxford magnet (Varian UNITY INOVA). The same ground samples were analyzed by 13C magic angle spinning and cross polarization magic angle spinning by packing each sample (~100 mg) into 4 mm Si3N4 rotors at a spinning rate of 6 KHz. 13C MAS experiments were run with a recycle time of 5 and 1200 s, 90° pulse lengths (7.5 µs) and 50 kHz bandwidth, and 200 scans for each experiment. 13C CPMAS spectra were collected with contact time between 0.3 and 16 ms; recycle time was 4 s. 13C chemical shifts were referenced to that of tetramethylsilane.

The same ground samples were dispersed in octane and further submitted to an ultrasonic bath. The suspensions were then dropped on carbon-coated copper grids for high-resolution transmission electron microscopy. HRTEM images were collected using a JEM 2010UHR (Jeol) microscope with a LaB6 thermoionic source operating at 200 kV and equipped with a Gatan imaging filter (GIF). Energy-filtered images were acquired using a 3 mm GIF entrance aperture and a slit width of 15 eV. All high-resolution images were acquired digitally using a 1 or 2 s exposure and 1x binning (1024 x 1024 pixels) of the charge-coupled-device (CCD) camera. A fast Fourier transform (FFT) was calculated on the images by using the Digital Micrograph (JEOL) software. Because of the ~19x magnification between the TEM viewing screen and the CCD camera, a preliminary calibration using a standard gold sample was performed to obtain corrected values of d-spacing in the hydrozincite samples.


    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Experimental methods
 Results and discussion
 Acknowledgments
 References cited
 
SEM analysis
Hydrozincite is a monoclinic mineral that typically forms under supergene alteration of Zn-bearing deposits. This mineral very rarely shows submillimetric euhedral crystals. The morphological features of the samples studied are significantly dependent on the mineral growth process. Geol1 and Geol2 samples show globular aggregates (Fig. 1aGo) and crystals are characterized by a platelet shape (Fig. 1bGo), probably caused by the association of crystallographic forms {100} and {010}. Samples grown under a condition of inorganic synthesis show acicular crystals (Fig. 1cGo) having a short side typically 100 and 200 nm in length, while the largest side is 2–10 µm and platelet shaped (Fig. 1dGo). Synthetic crystals shown in Figure 1dGo are flattened on {100} and show shapes and sizes similar to the geologically occurring crystals shown in Figure 1bGo. The distinctive feature of the Naracauli samples is that hydrozincite forms a packed network (Fig. 1eGo) and encrusts cyanobacteria sheaths (Fig. 1fGo). The crystals of the Nar sample show a platelet shape (Fig. 1gGo) having the shortest side typically 50–100 nm long. These crystals are misaligned and form a mesoporous aggregate having a sponge-like surface. In addition, some filaments of organic material are clearly visible between the sheaths (Fig. 1gGo) and sometime protrude out from the inner sheaths.


Figure 1
View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 1. SEM images of geologic sample Geol1 (a and b), synthetic sample Synth2 (c and d), and Naracauli natural biomineral (Nar) from (e to h). Morphological units flattened on {100} can be recognized for all samples. The morphology of Nar sample is characterized by sheaths and sole organic matter filaments.

 
XRD analysis
Figure 2Go shows some of the collected XRD patterns. All observed Bragg reflections can be indexed as a hydrozincite single phase with a monoclinic structure, according to experimental (PDF Card 19-1458) and calculated (PDF Card 72-1100) reference patterns. No peaks of other crystalline phases were detected. The I100 peak appears at 2{theta} {approx} 6°, and was indexed as the (200) hydrozincite main reflection. The (200) relative peak intensity is much higher than that reported for the monoclinc structure in the reference cards. This probably arises from a preferred orientation, in agreement with the {100} crystallographic form, as observed also by SEM imaging (Figs. 1a and bGo), at least for the Geol1 and Geol2 samples.


Figure 2
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 2. XRD patterns of geologic (Geol1 and Geol2), synthetic (Synth1 and Synth2), and biomineral (Nar) samples. All the patterns are in agreement with expected hydrozincite diffraction pattern.

 
The collected diffraction spectra indicate that peaks from Geol1 and Geol2 samples are well defined, while peaks from the synthesized samples clearly show peak broadening, and the largest peak broadening was observed for the biomineral sample (Nar). This suggests a progressive decrease in the size of crystal-coherent domains. An estimate of the crystallite size was derived from the full-width at half maximum (FWHM) of the most intense peak, according to the Debye-Scherrer formula. The average sizes calculated on the main reflection were ~21 nm for Geol1, ~19 nm for Geol2, ~14 nm for Synth2, ~10 nm for Synth1, and ~7 nm for Nar. It is worth noting that the observed nanocrystals persist several years after their synthesis, irrespective of their intrinsic instability. Thus, the progressive decrease in the size of crystal coherent domains should be dependent on the structural evolution of the minerals and/or on the crystallization process. Specifically, the persistence of the nanocrystals should be explained according to the mechanism of an imperfect oriented aggregation of nanoparticles (see Meldrum and Cölfen 2007, and references therein),

TEM analysis
A representative HRTEM micrograph of geologic samples is provided in Figure 3aGo, where a low magnification image of the Geol1 sample shows a euhedral particle. Due to the thickness of these well-crystallized particles, only the extreme edge is transparent to electrons in high-resolution mode at high magnification (Fig. 3bGo). The image of Figure 3bGo shows nanocrystalline domains larger than 5 nm with a grain boundary network. The observed nanocrystals exhibit the lattice plane distance of 2.85 Å, which corresponds to the (220) hydrozincite planes, as calculated by fast Fourier transform (FFT) in the inset (Fig. 3bGo).


Figure 3
View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 3. HRTEM images: Geol2 sample at low (a) and high magnification with FFT in the inset (b); Nar sample at high magnification (c-left) where lattice defects as grain boundaries (1,3) and stacking modes (2) are evidenced (c-right); FFT of Nar sample and particle size distribution (d); Synth1 sample at high magnification with FFT in the inset (e). Synthetic and biomineral samples are made by very small crystallites that aggregate with misalignment.

 
Representative images of the Nar sample are shown in Figure 3cGo, with the FFT in Figure 3dGo (inset). The particle size distribution of the Nar sample, calculated on about 2000 particles observed in dark-field images, is reported in Figure 3dGo. The average particle size is about 3–4 nm and the particle size distribution is narrow. TEM results are in good agreement with FWHM from XRD; the value (3–4 nm), lower than the average crystallite size determined by XRD (7 nm), could be the result of the presence of some attached isoriented primary nanoparticles. In the literature, primary nanoparticles were reported to spontaneously self-organize to a superstructure with a common crystallographic orientation in a process called "oriented attachment" (see for the instance, Banfield et al. 2000; Meldrum and Cölfen 2007). Figure 3cGo (inset 1 and 3) clearly indicates that nanocrystals can aggregate by fusion at the grain boundaries. Sometimes misalignment between crystallites falls below 10°. More often nanocrystals sharing some of the atomic positions at their grain boundaries show misalignment higher than 10°. The fusion process should be able to decrease the excess of surface free energy and then stabilize the nanocrystals. According to Meldrum and Cölfen (2007, and references therein) the platelet observed by SEM can be considered as a mesocrystals produced by imperfect oriented aggregation of the nanocrystals observed by TEM. In the Nar sample, the aggregation and fusion process cannot be scaled up and mesocrystals are only the platelets observed in Figures 1g and 1hGo. In high-resolution mode, some nanocrystals are observed with the lattice plane distances of 2.72 and 3.14 Å corresponding to the (021) and (020) hydrozincite planes. In comparison with geologic samples, the Nar sample shows lattice defects, which can be related to the presence of stacking modes [Fig. 3cGo (inset 2)], in addition to nanocrystals in contact through grain boundaries.

An HRTEM image of the Synth2 sample is shown in Figure 3eGo with the FFT in the inset. The HRTEM image shows grain boundaries and lattice defects, which can be ascribed to the presence of stacking modes on the basis of the typical streaking of the reciprocal rows observed in the FFT.

Nuclear magnetic resonance analysis
In principle, the NMR spectral analysis can give information on the presence of polytypes, different numbers of lattice defects in the samples, namely plane defects such as stacking faults (Tateyama et al. 1997; Harris 2004). This is because NMR spectra are influenced by the local environment, extending to only a few spheres of coordination, so long-range order is not required to produce a signal. The local environment can lower the local symmetry, thus affecting the individual chemical shift and broadening of the observed peaks, which are the result of a superposition of the signals arising from all the C atoms in given sites (Mehring 1983; Engelhardt 1987).

The 13C MAS NMR spectra obtained for the five hydrozincite samples are shown in Figure 4Go. The spectra were collected at two relaxation delays of 5 s (Fig. 4aGo) and 1200 s (Fig. 4bGo). To the best of our knowledge, NMR spectra of hydrozincite have never been reported in the literature.


Figure 4
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 4. 13C MAS NMR spectra of geologic samples (Geol1 and Geol2), synthetic samples (Synth1 and Synth2), and biomineral sample (Nar). The spectra were collected at two relaxation delays of 5 s (a) and 1200 s (b). All spectra have 50 Hz line broadening.

 
In the spectra of Geol1 and Geol2 shown in Figure 4aGo, a peak with FWHM of ~1 ppm is present at 163.8 ppm. Figure 4aGo shows that no signals are observed in the spectrum of Synth1, while a large featureless signal is observed in the spectrum of Synth2 in the range 160–168 ppm. The spectrum of Nar sample (Fig. 4aGo) shows overlapping signals falling in the 162–169 ppm range, with a main signal at ~164 ppm. The spectra of Geol1 and Geol2 in Figure 4bGo show a main peak at ~164 ppm, such as that observed in the spectra of Geol1 and Geol2 in Figure 4aGo; however, small shoulders at both low and high frequencies can now be identified. In addition, a small high-frequency signal at ~168 ppm can be observed in the spectrum of Geol1 (Fig. 4bGo). The spectrum of Synth1 (Fig. 4bGo) presents overlapping signals in the 163–169 ppm range. In Figure 4bGo, the spectrum of Synth2 shows features similar to those of Synth1; however the peaks in the range 165.5–169 ppm are broader. The spectrum of the Nar sample shows the same features under both delay conditions (Figs. 4a and 4bGo).

As observed in Figure 4Go, even the use of a very long relaxation delay (1200 s) gives 13C MAS NMR spectra of low quality. However, the use of the 13C cross-polarization maginc angle spinning (CPMAS) technique gives spectra with a better signal to noise ratio (Fig. 5aGo). For this reason, we consider the analysis of CPMAS spectra suitable to discriminate the single components of the overlapped signals, at least for the chemical shift of the different observed peaks. Moreover, 13C CPMAS is recognized as a useful technique for detecting the presence of biopolymers (Ueyama et al. 1998; Takahashi et al. 2004). The CPMAS NMR spectra should be effective for the organic components, which have many protons, and the intense signal of carbonate carbon atoms could be reduced by ineffective cross polarization. In fact, in the 1H-13C cross-polarization experiment the proton magnetization transfer to a carbon nucleus occurs during the contact time period and depends on the distance between the protons and carbon nuclei; moreover, it is governed by the characteristic proton spin-lattice relaxation time in the rotating frame (T1{rho}) and the carbon-proton cross polarization time (Mehring 1983; Slichter 1989). A quaternary or poorly protonated carbon is normally affected by slow rates of cross polarization from the few bonded or remote protons (Mehring 1983; Slichter 1989; Alemany et al. 1983).


Figure 5
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 5. 13C CPMAS NMR spectra of geologic samples (Geol1 and Geol2), synthetic samples (Synth1 and Synth2) and biomineral sample (Nar). Geol1, Geol2, Synth1, and Synth2 spectra collected with 4 ms (a) and 10 ms contact time (b); Nar sample collected with 1 ms (a) and with 10 ms (b) contact time. All spectra have 50-Hz line broadening.

 
Figure 5aGo shows the spectra collected with a contact time of 4 ms (the maximum polarization time for Geol1, Geol2, Synth1, and Synth2 samples), 1 ms for the Nar sample, and Figure 5bGo shows the spectra collected with contact time of 10 ms for all the samples. Geol1, Geol2, Synth1, and Synth2 samples show overlapping signals in the 162–169 ppm range, whose main signal appears at ~164 ppm, at contact times of 4 and 10 ms. Also the Nar sample shows an intense peak at ~164 ppm chemical shift overlapping with other signals in the range 150–180 ppm at contact time of 1 ms, but in this sample no signal was cross-polarizable with a contact time of 10 ms.

The overlapped signals collected with 4 ms contact time (Geol1, Geol2, Synth1, and Synth2) were decomposed into individual Gaussians by using the software package Origin 7 from Microcal. This approach has been used in the literature either for the simulation of infrared and Raman spectra of hydrozincite and smithsonite systems (Hales and Frost 2007), or NMR spectra of silicon carbide (Mykhaylyk et al. 2002). The information obtained (i.e., position, FWHM, and chemical shift values of geologic and synthetic samples) are reported in Table 1Go. From the above considerations about the CPMAS experiments, the relative areas of the signals in Table 1Go should be taken with caution and only as an indication of the relative amounts of the different structural conditions.

The fitting results clearly show that the signal at ~164 ppm is the main signal for all the samples, as observed in the MAS (Fig. 4Go) and CPMAS (Fig. 5Go) spectra. In the Geol1 sample two more signals were detected at ~163 and ~165 ppm, whereas in the Geol2 sample a further signal is detected at ~168 ppm. In the spectra of both synthetic samples, more components are present and a good simulation can be achieved using only five Gaussians at ~163, ~164, ~166, ~168, and ~169 ppm. Figure 6Go shows the experimental and the simulated spectra of the Synth2 sample, whereas the results of the fitting of all the samples are reported in Table 1Go.


Figure 6
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 6. 13C CPMAS NMR spectrum of the Synth2 sample. Experimental signals decomposed into individual Gaussians and residuals (which are offset for clarity). The species distributions in 13C CPMAS experiment of the Synth2 sample were obtained by a nonlinear fitting of the NMR spectrum to individual Gaussians by means of the Origin 4.1 program from Microcal Software. In the fitting procedure, the position, line width, and intensity were varied to find the best fit curve to the experimental spectrum.

 
The whole CPMAS spectrum of Nar sample collected at 1 ms contact time is reported in Figure 7Go. Additional broad signals at ~22, ~73, ~103, ~173, and ~181 ppm are clearly evident, whereas these signals were not observed in all the spectra of the other samples (spectra not shown). These additional signals may be attributed to the presence of organic material. Due to the complexity of the CPMAS spectrum of the Nar sample, the decomposition into individual Gaussians was not carried out.


Figure 7
View larger version (6K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 7. The whole 13C CPMAS spectrum of biomineral sample (Nar) sample collected at 1 ms contact time. (* indicates spinning side bands of the overlapping signals in the 163–169 ppm range.)

 
It is worth noting that, even though the hydrozincite structure (Ghose 1964) has only one crystallographically independent site for C, all MAS and CPMAS NMR spectra in Figures 4Go and 5Go show several peaks in the range 150–180 ppm, more dominant in the biomineral and synthetic samples. Several reasons can be taken into consideration to explain the presence of these additional signals:

(1) The presence of paramagnetic metals can influence the chemical shift, the spin lattice relaxation time (T1) and the line width of the carbon signals (La Mar et al. 1973). The amount of paramagnetic metal impurities in the Nar sample is lower than 0.3%, is below 0.1% in the Geol1 and Geol2 samples, and far below 0.1% in the Synth1 and Synth2 samples (Table 2Go). As a consequence, since overlapping signals are present in Nar, Synth1, and Synth2 samples, the presence of paramagnetic metal impurities cannot be responsible for the appearance of additional signals. It is worth noting that the spectra of Synth1 and Synth2 clearly show a very broad signal at 5 s delay (Fig. 4aGo), whereas small peaks are observed with the 1200 s delay (Fig. 4bGo). Thus, large T1 characterizes the NMR signals of these samples. However, the spectrum of the Nar sample appears to be independent of the delay, showing that the NMR signals are affected by shorter T1. Geologic samples show a slight dependence on experimental delay. This seems to indicate that samples having low paramagnetic metal impurity content show dependence on relaxation delay (Synth1 and Synth2), samples having high concentration impurities content show very little dependence (Nar), and samples of intermediate content show a slight dependence.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2. Metal concentrations in geologic samples (Geol1 and Geol2), synthetic samples (Synth1 and Synth2), and biomineral sample (Nar)
 
This shows that the paramagnetic metal impurities do have strong effects on the NMR spin lattice relaxation times affecting the appearance of the peaks as a function of relaxation delay in the MAS spectra (Figs. 4a and 4bGo). Similar information is obtained from the CPMAS spectra (Figs. 5a and 5bGo).

It may be suggested that in Nar, the presence of a higher concentration of paramagnetic metal impurities, when compared to the other samples, induces a shortening of the T1{rho} relaxation process, limiting the polarization transfer to C nuclei. This can explain the loss of cross-polarizable carbon signal in Nar sample collected at 10 ms contact time (Fig. 5Go).

(2) The appearance of extra peaks in the range 150–180 ppm could be explained by the presence of carbonyl/amide-carbons from organic biopolymers, as previously observed (Takahashi et al. 2004). However, the presence of the additional signals can be clearly excluded for the Synth1 and Synth2 samples, since they were synthesized in our laboratory in the absence of any organic molecule and no trace of organic filaments was observed in TEM images. As to the Geol1 and Geol2 samples, they show lower additional signals than the other samples analyzed, and, like the previous sample, the TEM images do not show traces of organic filaments. This evidence, and the fact that the amount of carbon estimated through CHNS-O analysis was in agreement with the stoichiometry of the hydrozincite formula (4.44%) for all the geologic and synthetic samples and for the Synth1 and Synth2 samples (Geol1 4.41%; Geol2 4.37%; Synth1 4.29%; Synth 4.34%) rule out this possibility.

Different considerations should be made regarding the Nar sample. In this sample, the C estimate through CHNS-O analysis revealed an excess of C (4.84%), which suggests the presence of biopolymer C. This evidence confirms the presence of some organic material in the Nar sample, as observed in SEM images, and is in good agreement with the signals observed in the CPMAS spectrum. In fact, the CPMAS spectrum (Fig. 7Go) of the Nar sample is characterized by broad signals that, in the absence of N, can be attributed, as revealed by CHNS-O analysis, to aliphatic chains (~22 ppm) and to O-aliphatic-carbons (~73 and ~103 ppm), whereas these signals were not observed in other samples. Carbonyl-C atoms would be expected in the range 160 < d ≤ 190 ppm. All this evidence would suggest the presence of signals coming from the carbonyl C from organic material in the range 150–180 ppm or at least, and more importantly, that the organic material has some influence in the formation of this additional signals.

(3) The NMR technique is well known to be sensitive to crystal order and to the presence of lattice defects such as stacking faults. The relation between stacking and/or polytype and NMR peak formation is well known in the literature for several phases such as silicon carbide (Hartman et al. 1987; Tateyama et al. 1997; Harris 2004), calcium silicate hydrate (Cong and Kirkpatrick 1996), and saponite (Vogels et al. 2005). Depending on mineral synthesis, different stacking sequences or polytypes can possibly be achieved, (Vogels et al. 2005), and these result in different energy minima (Ryjácek et al. 2001).

Despite the fact that C has only one crystallographic position in the ideal structure of hydrozincite, 13C NMR spectra of our samples show up to five peaks depending on the mineral formation. These additional peaks can be ascribed to the presence of lattice defects, namely grain boundaries and stacking modes, that lower the crystal structure symmetry present in these hydrozincite crystals, in agreement with HRTEM analysis.

TEM analysis indicates that the crystallite size (i.e., the size of coherent diffraction domains) for synthetic and biomineral samples is between 3 and 5 nm. Thus, besides the high surface area of biomineral hydrozincite, also the high concentration in lattice defects could affect the surface reactivity, playing a role in the hydrozincite biomineralization.

Finally, the mechanism governing the hydrozincite biomineral formation at the molecular scale is not yet understood. Specifically, as for most of the biomineralization described in the literature (Skinner 2005; Meldrum and Cölfen 2007, and references therein), the organic molecules supposedly involved in the control of nanocrystal surfaces were detected by coupling microscopic and spectroscopic analysis. The role of organic matter in the biomineralization requires further investigation and will be the subject of a successive paper. The information acquired in this work will be useful for modeling the mechanisms of formation of biominerals and for predicting their reactivity and stability under specific environmental conditions, eventually developing in vitro tests and field scale experiments on biomineral production.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Experimental methods
 Results and discussion
 Acknowledgments
 References cited
 
This work was funded by the Italian Ministry of University (PRIN 2005, Nanostructures on biomineral interfaces) and Banco di Sardegna Foundation (FBS). G.D.G. is grateful to Piero Lattanzi for the useful suggestions on an early version of the manuscript.


    Footnotes
 
MANUSCRIPT HANDLED BY BRIGITTE WOPENKA

MANUSCRIPT RECEIVED December 23, 2008; MANUSCRIPT ACCEPTED August 5, 2009


    REFERENCES CITED
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Experimental methods
 Results and discussion
 Acknowledgments
 References cited
 

Alemany, L.B., Grant, D.M., Pugmire, R.J., Alger, T.D., and Zilm, K.W. (1983) Cross polarization and magic angle sample spinning NMR spectra of model organic compounds. 2. Molecules of low or remote protonation. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 105, 2142–2147.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Banfield, J.F., Welch, S.A., Zhang, H.Z., Ebert, T.T., and Penn, R.L. (2000) Aggregation-based crystal growth and microstructure development in natural iron oxyhydroxide biomineralization products. Science, 289, 751–754.[Abstract/Free Full Text][CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline][GeoRef]

Boni, M., Gilg, H.A., Aversa, G., and Balassone, G. (2003) The "calamine" of southwest Sardinia: Geology, mineralogy and stable isotope geochemistry of supergene Zn mineralization. Economic Geology, 98, 731–748.[Abstract/Free Full Text][CrossRef][Web of Science][GeoRef]

Cong, X. and Kirkpatrick, R.J. (1996) 17O NMR investigation of the structure of calcium silicate hydrate gel. Journal of American Chemical Society, 79, 1585–1592.

De Giudici, G., Biddau, R., D’Incau, M., Leoni, M., and Scardi, P. (2005) Dissolution of nanocrystalline fluorite powders: An investigation by XRD and solution chemistry. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 69, 4073–7083.[CrossRef][Web of Science][GeoRef]

De Giudici, G., Podda, F., Caredda, A., Tombolini, R., Casu, M., and Ricci, C. (2007) In vitro investigation of hydrozincite biomineralization. In T.D. Bullen and Y. Wang, Eds., Water-Rock Interaction, p. 415–418. Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Water-Rock Interaction WRI-12, v. 1, Kunming, China. Taylor and Francis, London.

De Yoreo, J.J. and Vekilov, P.G. (2003) Principles of crystal nucleation and growth. In P. Dove, J.J. de Yoreo, and S. Weiner, Eds., Biomineralization, 54, p. 57–90. Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, Mineralogical Society of America, Chantilly, Virginia.

Engelhardt, G. (1987) High-Resolution Solid-State NMR of Silicates and Zeolites, 485 p. Wiley, New York.

Garcia-Clavel, M., Martinez-Lope, M.J., and Casais-Alvarez, M.T. (1989) Thermoanalytical study of the system Pb2+-Zn2+ coprecipitated as binary carbonates. Thermochimica Acta, 137, 177–187.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Ghose, S. (1964) The crystal structure of hydrozincite, Zn5(OH)6(CO3)2. Acta Crystallographica, 17, 1051–1057.[CrossRef][Web of Science][GeoRef]

Ghosh, R. and Singh, D.D.N. (2007) Kinetics, mechanism and characterization of passive film formed on hot dip galvanized coating exposed in simulated concrete pore solution. Surface and Coating Technology, 201, 7346–7359.[CrossRef]

Hales, M.C. and Frost, R.L. (2007) Synthesis and vibrational spectroscopic chararacterization of synthetic smithsonite and hydrozincite. Polyhedron, 26, 4955–4962.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Harris, R.K. (2004) NMR crystallography: The use of chemical shifts. Solid State Sciences, 6, 1025–1037.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Hartman, J.S., Richardson, M.F., Sherriff, B.L., and Winsborrow, B.G. (1987) Magic angle spinning NMR studies of silicon carbide: polytypes, impurities, and highly inefficient spin-lattice relaxation. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 109, 6059–6067.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Jacquat, O., Voegelin, A., Villard, A., Marcus, M.A., and Kretzschmar, R. (2008) Formation of Zn-rich phyllosilicate, Zn-layered double hydroxide and hydrozincite in contaminated calcareous soils. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 72, 5037–5054.[CrossRef][Web of Science][GeoRef]

Jambor, J.L. (1964) Studies of basic copper and zinc carbonates; Part 1, Synthetic zinc carbonates and their relationship to hydrozincite. Canadian Mineralogist, 8, 92–108.

——— (1966) Natural and synthetic hydrozincites. Canadian Mineralogist, 8, 652–653.

La Mar, G.N., Horrocks Jr., W.D., and Holm, R.H. (1973) NMR of Paramagnetic Molecules, 678 p. Academic Press, New York.

Land, T., Martin, T., Potapenko, S., Palmore, G.T., and De Yoreo, J.J. (1999) Recovery of surfaces from impurity poisoning during crystal growth. Nature, 399, 442–445.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Lowenstam, H.A. (1981) Mineral formed by organisms. Science, 211, 1126–1131.[Abstract/Free Full Text][CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Lubick, N. (2008) Risk of nanotechnology remain uncertain. Environmental Science and Technology, 42, 1821–1825.[Medline]

Madden, A.S. and Hochella, M.F. (2005) A test of geochemical reactivity as a function of mineral size: Manganese oxidation promoted by hematite nanoparticles. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 69, 389–398.[CrossRef][Web of Science][GeoRef]

Mehring, M. (1983) Principles of High Resolution NMR in Solids, 2nd edition, 342 p. Springer-Verlag, New York.

Meldrum, F. and Cölfen, H. (2007) Controlling mineral morphologies and structures in biological and synthetic systems. Chemical Reviews, 108, 4332–4432.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Mercy, M.A., Rock, P.A., Casey, W.H., and Mokarram, M.M. (1998) Gibbs energies of formation for hydrocerussite [Pb(OH)2·(PbCO3)2(s)] and hydrozincite {[Zn(OH)2]3·(ZnCO3)2(s)} at 298 K and 1 bar from electrochemical cell measurements. American Mineralogist, 83, 739–745.[Abstract][Web of Science][GeoRef]

Morales, J., Díaz, F., Hernández-Borges, J., and González, S. (2006) Atmospheric corrosion in subtropical areas: XRD and electrochemical study of zinc atmospheric corrosion products in the province of Santa Cruz de Tenerife (Canary Islands, Spain). Corrosion Science, 48, 361–371.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Mykhaylyk, O.O., Khimyak, Y.Z., Attfield, J.P., Mykola, P., and Gadzira, M.P. (2002) Phase segregation in silicon carbide-carbon solid solutions from XRD and NMR studies. Chemistry of Materials, 14, 1348–1353.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Paquette, J. and Reeder, R.J. (1995) Relationship between surface structure, growth mechanism, and trace element incorporation in calcite. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 59, 735–749.[CrossRef][Web of Science][GeoRef]

Podda, F., Zuddas, P., Minacci, A., Pepi, M., and Baldi, F. (2000) Heavy metal coprecipitation with hydrozincite [Zn5(CO3)2(OH)6] from mine waters caused by photosynthetic microorganisms. Applied Environmental Microbiology, 66, 5092–5098.[Abstract/Free Full Text][CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Ryjácek, F., Engkvist, O., Vacek, J., Kratochvíl, M., and Hobza, P. (2001) Hoogsteen and stacked structures of the 9-methyladenine·1-methylthymine pair are populated equally at experimental conditions: Ab initio and molecular dynamics study. Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 105, 1197–1202.

Skinner, H.C.W. (2005) Biominerals. Mineralogical Magazanine, 69, 621–641.[CrossRef]

Slichter, C.P. (1989) Principles of Magnetic Resonance, 3rd edition, 655 p. Springer Verlag, New York.

Stoffyn-Egli, P., Buckley, D.E., and Clyburne, J.A.C. (1998) Corrosion of brass in a marine environment: Mineral products and their relationship to variable oxidation and reduction conditions. Applied Geochemistry, 13, 643–650.[CrossRef][Web of Science][GeoRef]

Takahashi, K., Yamamoto, H., Onoda, A., Doi, M., Inaba, T., Chiba, M., Kobayashi, A., Taguchi, T., Okamura, T.-a., and Ueyama, N. (2004) Highly oriented aragonite nanocrystal–biopolymer composites in an aragonite brick of the nacreous layer of Pinctada fucata. Chemical Communications, 8, 996–997.[Medline]

Tateyama, H., Noma, H., Adachi, Y., and Komatsu, M. (1997) Prediction of stacking faults in β-silicon carbide: X-ray and NMR studies. Chemistry of Materials, 9, 766–772.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Ueyama, N., Hosoi, T., Yamada, Y., Doi, M., Okamura, T., and Nakamura, A. (1998) Calcium complexes of carboxylate-containing polyamide with sterically disposed NH-O hydrogen bond: Detection of the polyamide in calcium carbonate by 13C cross-polarization/magic angle spinning spectra. Macromolecules, 31, 7119–7126.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Uygur, V. and Rimmer, D.L. (2000) Reactions of zinc with iron-oxide coated calcite surfaces at alkaline pH. European Journal of Soil Science, 51, 511–516.[CrossRef][Web of Science][GeoRef]

Vogels, R.J.M.J., Kloprogge, J.T., and Geus, J.W. (2005) Synthesis and characterization of boron and gallium substituted saponite clays below 100 °C at one atmosphere. Microporous and Mesoporous Material, 77, 159–165.[CrossRef]

Weiner, S. and Dove, P. (2003) An overview of biomineralization processes and the problem of the vital effect. In P.M. Dove, J.J. De Yoreo, and S. Weiner, Eds., Biomineralization, 54, p. 1–24. Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, Mineralogical Society of America, Chantilly, Virginia.

Zabinsky, W. (1966) The problem of stacking-order in natural hydrozincite. Canadian Mineralogist, 8, 649–652.

Zuddas, P. and Podda, F. (2005) Variations in physico-chemical properties of water associated with bio-precipitation of hydrozincite [Zn5(CO3)2(OH)6] in the waters of Rio Naracauli, Sardinia (Italy). Applied Geochemistry, 20, 507–517.[CrossRef][Web of Science][GeoRef]



This Article
Right arrow Abstract
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by De Giudici, G.
Right arrow Articles by Casu, M.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation


JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2010 by Mineralogical Society of America